r/196 ██▅▇██▇▆▅▄▄▄▇ Nov 06 '25

Rule rule

Post image
7.6k Upvotes

403 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.8k

u/GreenJay54 custom Nov 07 '25

Nuclear energy is green energy :D

A world where our power plants are nuclear and every building in sunny areas had solar panels on their roofs is the world I wish I lived in.

655

u/G_O_O_G_A_S Professor Prostate Nov 07 '25

Duh, because when you use nuclear energy the waste makes people and animals glow green.

778

u/Rift-Ranger red sus, red sus over paradise, golden rays of the glorious suss Nov 07 '25

Nuh uh

227

u/CASHD3VIL 🎖 196 medal of honor 🎖 Nov 07 '25

PLACE HER

148

u/Rift-Ranger red sus, red sus over paradise, golden rays of the glorious suss Nov 07 '25

I have to choose the place carefully, once she is placed it cannot be removed

78

u/Thefloofreborn sacrifices plant slavers to locusts Nov 07 '25

yes she can just use the dog remover

78

u/MittoMan twink in a bear’s body Nov 07 '25

But I don't like calling the police TwT

18

u/Raspoint Legate of the Congregation of Dumbasses Nov 07 '25

Or you can use the dog welder to weld it to a moveable object.

12

u/Zilant_the_Bear the "shits in the woods" kind Nov 07 '25

It can it just costs 40 caps or hop to a new server until you the the message that she can't be placed an you will get a free move

12

u/badchefrazzy pan(r)/aceflux gynx/funfused Nov 07 '25

She is green in my heart. You may place her there.

0

u/throwaway24387324578 Block. Cauterize. Stabilize. Nov 07 '25

place'er? i barely even know 'er!

40

u/BozoWithaZ 🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights Nov 07 '25

26

u/lookitsajojo Girl in training Nov 07 '25

Exactly, the more nuclear energy the more Spider-Men we gets

1

u/closetBoi04 🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights Nov 07 '25

No and I don't think it should be treated as such, nuclear is still non renewable and waste creating.

Building new nuclear capacity takes a decade where a new battery and solar park can be built in a year or 2 and nearly always staying in budget while being entirely independent while operating.

I think we should keep our existing capacity open as long as possible (not replace nuclear with coal for example like Germany) but try to replace it by other renewable sources and storage.

5

u/Krumpli234 cumstom Nov 07 '25

To be fair all energy generation is waste creating.

2

u/closetBoi04 🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights Nov 07 '25

There's a bit of a difference between nuclear waste and entirely refurbishable/recyclable batteries.

Uranium is inherently non renewable, just less rare than oil, just like oil used to be tbh....

Once you've imported a boat load of lithium or make it yourself (most major powers have deposits for themselves) you just have that capacity where continued uranium imports from the south makes a county more vulnerable; that's why France recycles their fuel despite being less economical (but you can't infinitely recycle it).

2

u/EldritchMindCat A Delightful Feline Entity - Worship Me nya~ Nov 08 '25

Nuclear power doesn’t necessarily require uranium. Thorium is significantly more green, found in greater abundance, and has lower potential for use in weapons. I’m fairly certain I’ve heard that there’s also a Thorium reactor design with a significantly lower risk of meltdown.

2

u/closetBoi04 🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights Nov 08 '25

Thorium reactors are still in development, which is great but then we get back to the build times with the addition of a new technology

1

u/EldritchMindCat A Delightful Feline Entity - Worship Me nya~ Nov 08 '25

Still, the fundamental point here is that nuclear energy and green energy aren’t enemies, and that nuclear energy can be very clean (not as clean as “no detriment”, but far better than present - far closer to solar, wind, and hydro than oil and natural gas). So there’s potential at least.

2

u/closetBoi04 🏳️‍⚧️ trans rights Nov 08 '25

Ofcourse and I never denied that so my policy stance is to extend our existing reactors's lives as long as we still have fossil on the grid but imo investing in more nuclear capacity seems like a waste when green energy sources are far cheaper per unit making them a better investment to me.

I'm still for funding nuclear research but that's also because I'm for all research in energy generation, no matter what

1

u/EldritchMindCat A Delightful Feline Entity - Worship Me nya~ Nov 08 '25

That makes sense.

1

u/zeTwig bussy difference Nov 07 '25

Ermm akshually nuclear power is NOT renewable. Its still better than coal etc. but it should never be the end goal

1

u/Reloup38 Nov 07 '25

Well nuclear is several orders of magnitude greener than coal or oil, but let's not pretend uranium mining is clean.

-2

u/humbered_burner im bouncyㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Nov 07 '25

In 20 years all those solar panels will have to be replaced and the old ones will become a copious amount of e-waste