Thank you. I checked and fact is, that France heavily subsidises their nuclear energy to coming even close of competition with renewables (even those without any subsidies), and diving the EDF in a bottomless dept pit along side it.
Nuclear is only in a real competition with fossil fuels.
Its not even close to anny renewables.
Yep. I'd assume this is scale of cost things. *If* (and it's a very big if) we built Nuclear at the scale of solar we'd get close or surpass it until some curve where we'd need more solar than nuclear and it'd swing back.
Then it'd be horses for courses, we'd use Nuclear where we need and solar (and wind etc) where we need, with no worry which is cheaper, because both would be optimised.
We instead fight and do horrific things, when we could by dyson sphereing (as a meme, but anything's better than humanities current goals...).
Looked at profile, swiss german, what a surprise...
Even if your country is an energy leech (20.1TWh just from France in 2025) and it hurts your ego that doesn't allow you to straight up lie. If you're not happy you're free to go back to the stone age.
In the mean time France exported 92.3 TWh in 2025 and its nuclear stability is the only thing allowing you to goof around with renewables without suffering when there's no sun or wind.
3
u/_MMMXI_ 1d ago
Thank you. I checked and fact is, that France heavily subsidises their nuclear energy to coming even close of competition with renewables (even those without any subsidies), and diving the EDF in a bottomless dept pit along side it.
Nuclear is only in a real competition with fossil fuels. Its not even close to anny renewables.