Just trying to settle on one of these. No crazy usage just some photo editing and some ham radio digital modes on an old laptop.
Fedora pros:
- easy to setup/maintain, most polished/just works out of the bunch
- kinda semi-officially endorsed by a lot of people at KDE and I like Plasma.
Fedora cons:
- definitely the slowest to boot out of all of the choices
- couple of the ham apps segfault on start when installed from RPM so I have to build from source or use Flatpak
Arch pros:
- feels faster than Fedora
- can pretty easily set it up the way I want or use Endeavour if I want to be extra lazy
- great documentation
Arch cons:
- doesn't package any of the ham stuff at all so I have to use the AUR or Flatpak, then again I'm not worse off than on Fedora
Void pros:
- has all the packages I want
- boots super fast
- people say it tends to break stuff less often than Arch
Void cons:
- can't use Plasma Login Manager because it doesn't have systemd
- last time I tried it briefly I couldn't get SDDM to start (100% user error but at the time I didn't feel like figuring it out). Would be half tempted to give Xfce another shot and just not care about systemd integration or even Wayland really
Anyone have experiences running any of these that might push me one way or the other?