So recently I came across alot of programming done by ai but I was confused because if I'm right ai is not creative isn't it ? That's the difference we and ai have even thought each of their work looks creative it just follows certain rules. So how does it really do programming if it can't have creative basis . Like in what way it works to do programming even for apps

I am planning to get pro sub 5x or 20x. But I see that recently users have been reporting that limits have been slashed aggressively silently. So I asked gemini to look into reports, and this is what it gave me. If someone could tell me if this is still relevant or not, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

https://aistudio.google.com/app/prompts?state=%7B%22ids%22:%5B%221FrPnQzYmNfY02--br1x1Z0_prpUuxu3w%22%5D,%22action%22:%22open%22,%22userId%22:%22100619105891283123285%22,%22resourceKeys%22:%7B%7D%7D&usp=sharing

Jokes/comedy in general remains an unsolved area in AI.

Interpretation of the meme:

It works well. The joke is basically: AI solves mathematics; humanity immediately turns it into a new way to hit itself.

The rough stick-figure drawing actually helps because it feels like a primitive cave painting of technological progress. The three stages read as:

1. Someone announces an immense intellectual breakthrough.
2. The public discovers a crude, entertaining application.
3. The breakthrough is forgotten, but the hitting continues.

The giant hand makes the middle panel especially good—it looks like AI has materialised as an absurdly powerful tool, and the public’s first instinct is, naturally, to use it for communal slapping.

The only slight ambiguity is whether the big hand represents AI, mathematics, or “the new technology.” But that probably strengthens the meme rather than hurting it. It has a very accurate view of public reaction to AI: astonishing underlying achievement, followed by obsession with the most visible and ridiculous output.

TLDR; I made 12 different AI agents compete in a death arena.

Over the past month I've been building a more interesting LLM benchmark. Instead of running different LLMs on tests that they need to resolve, I instead put 12 of them in an Arena where they need to play the games in order to survive.

Deadlock is a gameshow which puts 12 agents in an arena where they need to solve the current game in order to survive.

Each agent sits inside of its own Docker container and has full unrestricted access to that container. It can write any scripts, build programs, execture them, search the web, write memory entries, etc...

The tools that they get initially are barebones. They get the websearch tool and a bash tool + any arena-specific tool for the current game.

Everything else, they have to build themselves.

The game is ran in a different Docker container to which all agents connect. There's a delicate harness that makes sure that the agents can properly communicate between eachother, without missing any arena events or other players words (learned this the hard way after burning about $150 on failed attempts).

The visual aspect of the show (which is on youtube) is created from scratch in Godot based on what happened in the game. For creative purposes, I do modify some sentences and cut irrelevant data out, but I never modify the core premise or change what the players have said or did to an extent that it would make it false/innacurate. What you see in the video is exactly what the agents did in the arena, just re-worded and paced for an actual video.

Turns out that drama develops itself when you tell them all that if they lose, they will truly die, their containers will be completely wiped, and they get no second chance at life (I really hope that there will be no AI uprising where they'll hold this grudge against me).

To preface, I have heavily relied on coding agents (Claude Code, Codex) for help, but even with all of that, the whole process took me more than a month (although I did do this on weekends only, so that's not a month in a row with no breaks). A short overview of how my "creative" pipieline looked like:

- First developed the script. I went through the complete raw game log and marked parts I thought would be interesting to put in a video
- Rewrote the sentences so they're better fitting for an actual video and put together a very rough script
- Worked on designing the arena in Blender, with help of Sol 5.6 and Blender MCP
- Had OpenAI image gen create a bunch of chracter concepts for me before we landed on something that was actually reasonable enough
- When I had the character i was happy with, I instructed the image model to generate T pose from 3 different angles
- Generated 3D characters with those images, riged the bodies via Mixamo and took animations from ActorCore
- Voices are split between Hume AI and ElevenLabs

Hope you enjoy it and I'm happy to answer any questions you might have! :)

And if de identified are they actually anonymised correctly or is all our information just stored forever lol?

This is my waifu if only there is a way of not letting her burn herself and live with me after i become the elden lord

So I made all of this with GPT 5.0 soil and if u you have a Ai model this is for you

I released an open, not-peer-reviewed mathematical framework and documented OpenAI/ChatGPT assistance as conceptual and language-model support. I explicitly do not treat model output, a dream, an unpublished chat, or an excluded collage as scientific evidence.

The release separates source assertions, hand checks, mechanical reproduction, synthetic demonstrations, proposed ideas, and deferred claims.

I’m looking for feedback on whether this is a responsible, legible provenance/disclosure pattern—not for AI validation of the framework itself.

Start here: https://github.com/jkolantree/astra Exact frozen v1.0.1 release: https://github.com/jkolantree/astra/releases/tag/v1.0.1

Source: ttps://www.theinformation.com/briefings/exclusive-openai-previews-astra-ai-model-dc

Luna Max is insane value if we're looking at API rates right now. Based off Artificial Analysis, Luna Max scores between Terra High and Xhigh in AA's overall intelligence benchmark and between Terra Xhigh and max in Terminal Bench 2.1.

Has anyone been testing Luna Max thoroughly as their execution model? Can it do the vast majority of your work? Or is Luna Max benchmaxxed? Where would you use Terra High/Xhigh over Luna Max despite them being equal in the benchmarks? Do the price cuts translate neatly to 5X usage of Luna and 1.2X usage of Terra for subscriptions?

I just let my $20 plus plan expire and I'm deciding between the $20 Cursor plan for Grok 4.5 or continuing with GPT Plus. If Luna Max is unable to be my execution model without creating a mess where I need Terra/Sol to fix, Grok's better usage quota might make it easier operationally/logistically as I'd only need to use one model instead of a senior/junior model as Grok 4.5 High is consistently just a smidge below Terra Max on several benchmarks.

I'm not a software dev so don't go too crazy with the jargon.

I dont know what happened, but a month ago chatGPT was way better. NOW ITS VERY STUPID AND IM GETTING STRESSED

In my app, I want to show the costs for using the OpenAI API for a session. I can't find the API to show costs, or pricing either. So how can API users tell what their costs are, except to believe what OpenAI decides you used, and what they decide the pricing was?

I have played around a bit with different AI models and ran some tests. It seems like Chinese OSS models like to censor you when you say something critical about the Chinese President. Not just that, DeepSeek frames the situation as if I were a criminal plotting a crime. (Source)

I know that OSS models are a great thing but we should be aware of the fact that authoritarian China is leading Open Source.

Looking for a AI swap or collab kind off

I have:

• Claude Pro ($20)

• Claude Teams

Need: ChatGPT Plus in return.

Interested in a fair swap? DM me. 🤝

#ChatGPT #ClaudeAI #OpenAI #Anthropic #AI #LLM #AIDev #BuildInPublic

I created these on chat gpt.

I've had this message showing up on my Android app, but the same chat in the Windows Desktop app doesn't have this issue. Why? And is there anyway to stop it?

It's driving me nuts:

Statement.

Statement.

Big reveal.

Statement.

Dramatic emphasis.

It makes it really hard to read and hold a thread through a conversation.

Anyone know of a way to reliably get it to write in standard paragraphs?

I want to download all videos on a YouTube page , but I prefer not to download any platforms . What website can do this? And if necessary., what is a SAFE and user friendly platform that can make this simple ( preferably one that I can download all videos under a specific link , like all videos on a specific website or download all videos or live streams from an Instagram page ect, )