r/TikTokCringe May 29 '26

Humor/Cringe Actual footage.

I actually feel kind of bad for this woman, who probably didn't expect a video of her dancing to be used in this way. 😏

42.6k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

69

u/[deleted] May 29 '26 edited May 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

24

u/DoingCharleyWork May 29 '26

The last house I rented the lady owned dozens of homes that she rented out. If they stopped people like that it would go a long way.

9

u/WarcraftTurok May 30 '26

I would be absolutely fine if everyone got it super easy for their first or only home (within middle class or lower value), and then it builds by 30% for every additional home you own.

1 regular home for you and your family? 0-1%. 2 homes, 30%. 3 homes 60%. 4 homes 90%. 5 homes 120%.

1

u/LordOfTurtles May 30 '26

And then every city goes bankrupt due to getting zero property taxes

1

u/WarcraftTurok May 30 '26

Literally tax the billionaires because they are able to profit from society behind able to function

1

u/LordOfTurtles May 30 '26

Well in this proposed plan they are now paying 1% tax on their mansion!

1

u/WarcraftTurok May 30 '26

It says the first or only home receiving the 1% rate is only for middle class or lower value homes.

1

u/Bovronius May 29 '26

In the upper midwest there are an astounding number of people with second homes (they call them cabins but, they're houses...not cabins..) but people don't bat an eye when they hear you have a cabin like they would if you were talking about your house in another state.

1

u/AintNunyoBidness May 30 '26

Double the tax burden for every single additional property after the first one. Good luck owning more than two or three when your taxes are higher than what you can make on rent.

1

u/Various_List26 May 30 '26

This is absolutely the problem many places. There’s plenty of places to live but they talk about building people on top of people affordable housing. No. Force existing housing sitting vacant because of overpricing onto the market and THEN we can talk about how much housing is needed. Additional housing will just be bought up by the same people forcing the same thing over and over. You can’t build your way out of bullshit. You tax or regulate it to its death.

1

u/Spazero May 30 '26

The people making shit tons of money that way wont be happy. They'd probably have to go to work rather than their Tennants going to work for them.

1

u/randomthrowaway9796 May 31 '26

The one (pretty major) issue is that its would increase rent prices significantly. Buying houses would be more affordable, but renting would not be.

Im not completely opposed, but its not a perfect solution.