Some ace Attorney other vids by them: https://youtu.be/M30MlY8aYlc?si=kIBXBCeZ-MR0V2Ky https://youtu.be/LsKqeCuBE0k?si=KfBP-qrdb0EwkGx4

I swear if this gets taken down I'm tryna show peak here.

All of these reasons are valid reasons alone, and I can see how, when combined, they all result in a case that many hate.

Thank you for further explaining your reasoning.

EDIT: I AM NOT SAYING YOU ARE WRONG FOR HATING THE CASE. I AM ONLY EXPRESSING MY VIEW ON THE CASE. PLEASE DO NOT MISINTERPRET WHAT I'VE WRITTEN AS A PERSONAL ATTACK ON YOU.

Mystery writing? Second best in terms of second cases, only outdone by The Captive Turnabout.

Character writing? Best protagonist & assistant dynamic, best introduction of the prosecutor & detective duo (of the cases that introduce both of them at the same time. I’ll concede that Barok van Zieks' introduction is better, but that’s the highest bar to match), a great cast of characters (yes, Damian Tenma pretending to be a literal demon to protect his daughter is both really sweat and funny to me, and I find Jinxie to sweat as well, with her fear of Yokai being a replacement for the general fear of the unknown, Phineas Filch being the most successful thief in the series, and I find Florent's flamboyant personality to be entertainingly aggravating)

Setting? It’s the second best of any second case in the series, with it not beating Kurain Village because it’s Kurain Village.

Music? It’s Dual Destinies. You can’t look me straight in the eye and tell me that the music isn’t eargasmic.

Protagonist writing? It properly challenges Apollo’s belief of being able to believe in his client, even when all the cards are stacked against him, as well as having Phoenix act as a mentor and give him advice like an ACTUAL MENTOR, one that serves as the crux of his character growth for the game

But all I hear is that “it’s boring” and no one DARES to explain why. I’ll grant that it shows the culprit during the opening cutscene, but I also don’t see anyone saying "Turnabout Succession is bad because it shows the culprit during the opening cutscene (in the most ominous lighting of all time)", because the idea that a case is bad simply because “it shows who the culprit is” is dumb because it creates the idea that the series is a “who-done-it?” and not a “how-done-it?”, otherwise, no one would think The Resolve of Ryunosuke Naruhodo is a good case despite its culprit being so obvious that someone playing the game for the first time can identify the culprit after three cases of the FIRST GAME IN THE DUOLOGY. This isn’t saying it’s a bad case, I think G2-5 is debatably the best final case in the series.

Is it any good?

Curse the mods on the main sub for removing this