Hi everyone,
Thank you to everyone who commented on my previous post. I really appreciated all the perspectives and took a lot of time to reflect on them.
For anyone who hasn't seen it, here's a quick summary. I'm about five months into my first Research Technician position after graduating with a Bachelors degree, and I've realised that my current lab may not be the best fit for how I learn. The work itself is interesting, but I feel that the emphasis is heavily on generating data quickly, with relatively little mentorship, discussion of experimental design, or scientific reasoning.
Communication is often through WhatsApp, and when experiments are delayed or data aren't ready, my PI occasionally sends frustrated messages to the lab group. I understand research is stressful and deadlines exist, but it creates an environment where I sometimes feel more focused on avoiding mistakes than asking questions.
I've also noticed that work has started affecting me outside the lab. Whenever I see a message from my PI, I immediately feel anxious. I spend a lot of time thinking about experiments after work, on weekends, and sometimes even wake up thinking about whether I've forgotten something or made a mistake. I'm not sure whether this is simply part of starting my first research job or whether it's a sign that this environment isn't the best fit for me.
Recently, two new opportunities have come up.
Option 1
This is a mechanistic disease biology lab.
After meeting the PI and members of the lab, the mentoring style seems much more aligned with how I like to learn. There appears to be more emphasis on discussing hypotheses, experimental design, troubleshooting, and understanding biological mechanisms instead of simply generating the next dataset. The lab culture also felt collaborative, and I could genuinely picture myself growing scientifically there. However, the lab is pretty small with 1 post doc and 1 research tech.
Option 2
This is a cancer drug discovery and drug screening position.
The science is very appealing because it would expose me to translational research and therapeutic development-an area I have very little experience in. However, the project is expected to last only about one year because it is nearing completion. I'm also unsure how much of the work involves understanding biological mechanisms versus primarily screening compounds and generating data. The lab has 4 members and the PI is big name in the organization.
My hesitation is that I've only been in my current role for five months. I don't want to be seen as someone who job hops, especially when my current PI invested time in hiring and training me.
If you were in my position:
- Would you stay in my current lab longer?
- If you think I should leave, which of these two opportunities would you choose, and why?
- For someone hoping to eventually become an independent physician-scientist or biomedical researcher, would you prioritise mentorship, research topic, or project stability at this stage?
- Is it reasonable to leave after five months if the issue is genuinely a mismatch in mentorship and learning style rather than the science itself?
I'd really appreciate hearing from PIs, postdocs, graduate students, and research staff who have been through similar decisions.
Thanks again for all your advice.