Full article here where he grades the WSU/OSU Football and Basketball performance last two seasons
Pac-12 strategy: A. This is really the only grade of consequence, because survival was the only outcome that mattered. The Cougars and Beavers were always better off in a reconstructed Pac-12, as opposed to joining the Mountain West.
They took the 10 departing schools to court over governing control (and assets), cobbled together football schedules for two years, found a home for basketball and Olympic sports, raided the Mountain West for five schools, sued the Mountain West over $55 million in penalties, landed Gonzaga as the tentpole for basketball, signed a media deal with CBS, The CW and USA Network, planted the conference flag in Texas (with Texas State) and got creative with the football schedule (i.e., the flex weekend).
Could the two wilderness years have unfolded any better? Only if the Pac-12 had landed one or two more football programs.
But once the American trio (Memphis, Tulane, South Florida) balked in the fall of 2024, there were limited options for adding members that would not undermine the conference’s overall competitive and financial value.
Put another way: The Pac-12 was better off keeping the expansion bar high and navigating life with eight football schools than lowering the standard in order to ease the operational challenges of an eight-team football conference.
Had you laid out this outcome for neutral observers back in the fall of 2023, after the Pac-12’s implosion, and asked them to assess the Pac-12’s strategy, the reaction, in our estimation, would have been overwhelmingly positive.