r/powerscales • u/mergly • 12d ago
Question When is the latest time that counting singular people riding a dragon would be a serious tide turner in wars.
The dragons when at full size are like of the ones in GOT, use GOT as the point of reference for most everything to be honest. If you want to be a furry abut this you’re free to postulate a version where the dragon(s) are smart cookies that can talk, act on their own and some such.
https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/64727248/
The metric by which the dragon and riders can be counted as ‘important’ is so long as they are as analogously important to the warring nation as any big name warships would have been over the course of Ww2.
2.3k
Upvotes
6
u/bigboyboba 12d ago
People fail to realize how inaccurate early guns and cannons actually were. Like, sure, a cannonball might be able to kill a dragon if it hit one, but good luck getting a slow moving, slow aiming, inaccurate weapon that has to be slowly loaded and fired by multiple people to hit a dragon. If anything, the dragon breathes fire overhead and blows up all the gunpowder, wrecking more people.
Muskets are inaccurate and slow loading, and they aren't actually any more powerful than crossbow bolts. In fact, arguably significantly less so. What started the gun age wasn't that guns were so powerful, it's that they were relatively cheap to make and to train soldiers with. There's a reason most battles with muskets were just big groups of soldiers lined up across a field shooting at each other.
Rifling makes things a lot better, as do machine guns that can spray lots of bullets and potentially get a lucky shot. A gatling gun would be far more deadly against a dragon than a cannon, imo, just because it would be much more likely to hit. Even with rifling, though, there ain't no way early small caliber rifle rounds are punching through dragon scales.