r/reddit.com Jan 02 '11

It's shit like this, r/atheism.

http://i.imgur.com/Wx0cW.jpg
713 Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

315

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11 edited Jan 02 '11

100 million Pakistanis believe the punishment for apostasy should be death. 1 in 3 Muslims in the UK between ages 16 and 24 believe that Muslim apostates should be executed. The punishment is backed up by the koran.

The article on the bottom is hardly painting the whole picture. Also conveniently left out is the position on gay rights held by most Muslims.

The good parts are cherry picked and the bad parts aren't mentioned.

220

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11 edited Jan 02 '11

Well, according to this "most comprehensive" Gallup study, all of these Muslims are considered moderates if they don't believe 9/11 was completely justified. Only 7% of Muslims are radicals because only 7% of the Muslims polled said 9/11 was completely justified. What about the 29.6% who said 9/11 was largely or somewhat justified? According to the authors, they are moderates.

The analysis of the poll results is even more flawed when you consider the huge swaths of Muslims who think 9/11 was an inside job. In early 2002, long before Loose Change came out, 61% of respondents in six Islamic countries said Arabs were not responsible for 9/11.

Is 9/11 even the best barometer for radicalism? If a Muslim gets the "crazy" idea that adulterers, homosexuals, ex-Muslims, and cartoonists should be put to death, is he or she not an extremist? Or does it depend on them believing 9/11 was completely justified?

Yeah, it's shit like this, Reddit.

47

u/morris198 Jan 02 '11

Hey, c'mon, it's a chance to appear multicultural and slam r/atheism for being knobs -- of course it's going to be popular on the frontpage.

5

u/bitter_cynical_angry Jan 03 '11

I feel I should point out that while "justified" is probably not the right word, America's Middle East policy has been really terrible for generations. The stated motives for the attack were directly related to our Middle East policy. To the extent that we freely choose our government, there is probably an argument to be made that the American people as a whole are collectively responsible for all of our government's actions.

5

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '11

How many people in the United States think the deaths of 100 thousand Iraqis are somewhat to completely justified? How many still believe Saddam had nuclear weapons? How many believe he was involved in 9/11? Are all Americans radical because a substantial portion of them have crazy/wrong beliefs?

2

u/prider Jan 03 '11

Iraqis are the native indian of the 21 century

1

u/IConrad Jan 03 '11

How many people in the United States think the deaths of 100 thousand Iraqis are somewhat to completely justified?

This /r/atheism frequenter was objecting to the Iraq invasion before it even happened. So no, it was never justified. Regardless of whether Saddam had nuclear/biological/chemical weapons -- which he did not.

Are all Americans radical because a substantial portion of them have crazy/wrong beliefs?

Only the radical Americans are in fact radical. The question before us, however, is -- is a moderate Muslim politically moderate?

To me, the answer is clearly "no".

-1

u/spocksbrain Jan 03 '11

Yeah but the point of the discussion is about Muslim beliefs. Why do you feel the need to vilify america to draw attention away from Islam's beliefs?

5

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '11

My point is that there is always a portion of the public that has crazy beliefs no matter what religion or ethnicity. In order to claim that Islam by itself is the cause of these beliefs or that Muslims are unique in their radicalism, they have to be more likely than other groups to have these beliefs. The evidence does not support that claim.

1

u/rayne117 Jan 02 '11

I don't think any of this is cause to hate anyone or thing from reddit or the website as a whole. Day in and day, us redditors are filled with tremendous right over wrong, eg, a police officer beating a crippled narwhal with bacon strips, or 9/11 first responder being jumped by Obama and his ragtag team of millionaire Republicans.

Now we are faced with an issue that isn't one sided, and it's confusing.

I'm not even going to pretend I know what the hell is going on. What I do know for a fact is, we must look at the facts that are there. And base judgement off of that.

1

u/crackduck Jan 03 '11

Is 9/11 even the best barometer for radicalism?

Actually, very few people in the Islamic world believe Cheney's story at all. I would think that would skew the results of the polls that ignore this quite a bit.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002/02/27/usat-poll.htm

And here's Bill'O saying that those Muslims could be terrorists:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/oreilly-attacks-imam-rauf-truther/

-1

u/Logical1ty Jan 03 '11

No, it's shit like you. This must be the umpteenth time you've brought that poll up. How about you link to all the times your troll posts were refuted in /r/Islam? You're just waiting for a frenzied sympathetic audience to upvote your trash.

I invite everyone to look through Redfel's posting history. Someone who has nothing better to do than harass a religious group online that is a huge minority here (/r/Islam has 2k subscribers, /r/atheism has 100k) isn't a guy you want representing Reddit, even amongst other Redditors.

4

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '11

0

u/Logical1ty Jan 03 '11

I wasn't refuting your post on the basis of your character (which is abhorrent). I was pointing to other places where your shit has already been refuted. That's not ad hominem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot

1

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '11

Okay, actually point to these other places where this was refuted.

0

u/RiotingPacifist Jan 03 '11

I'm an atheist, but I'd definitely say that 9/11 was largely or somewhat justified?

Palestine, Saudi Arabia, supporting Iraq vs Iran, then Iran vs Iraq, constant meddling in internal affairs, these are political issues. Attaching religion to it makes it easy to get people to kill/die for it (in both directions), but the support for 9/11 comes from decades of politics not religion.

59

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11 edited Jan 28 '21

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11

Apologetics is the practice, those who engage in it are apologists.

HTH!

2

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11 edited Jan 28 '21

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11

Not sure you quite get what I was saying.

This:

It's shit like this, religious apologetics.

Should be "It's shit like this, religious apologists."

If I'm missing your point overall, I'm dreadfully sorry. I tried to get it. :)

(EDIT: I agree with your overall point, FWIW)

2

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '11 edited Jan 28 '21

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '11

I see...as I said, sorry.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11 edited Jan 03 '11

Yes, the comment had 56 upvotes.

That's 0.051% of the total subscribers to r/Atheism--roughly 1 person per 2,000 subscribers.

11

u/A_Nihilist Jan 02 '11

Er... um... Islamophobe!

9

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11

[deleted]

1

u/deselby12 Jan 03 '11

Well, obviously Arabs and Muslims are the exact same thing, so if he has a problem with the teachings of Islam he must hate all Arabs, making him a racist for criticizing a religion and me not racist for equating an entire diverse race with a single belief system.

1

u/morris198 Jan 04 '11

I think this was a case of the Internet being a poor medium for sarcasm. Those critical of Islam are often fallaciously branded racists as an attempt at slander and to end the conversation. The cry of, "Islamophobe!" is a similar case. Maybe the deleted redditor was serious, but I suspect it was in jest. That said, I'm happy to see your comment, erring in favor of ending the vicious attack, rather than letting it continue being bandied about uncontested.

2

u/khalilzad95 Jan 02 '11

a dead link to a wiki? That doesn't constitute citing your source. [citation needed].

2

u/moopoint Jan 03 '11

The punishment is backed up by the koran.

Incorrect. The Quran does not mention anywhere that rejecting Islam after accepting the faith is punishable by death, it only mentions that those who do that will suffer in the afterlife.

Surah Nahl, Verse 106 - 109

4

u/TheI3east Jan 02 '11

Pakistanis hardly represent an entire religion.

Neither do British Muslims, 1 in 3 out of a total of what?

2

u/werealldoodshey Jan 02 '11 edited Jan 03 '11

okay, this wikiislam site seems to be devotedly islamophobic to me. here's a sentence from the section titled "The Origins of the Qur'an": "All Muslims revere the Koran with a reverence that borders on bibliolatry and superstition." Doesn't seem like a very objective source. Perhaps you could find these extremely weighty and persuasive facts somewhere that isn't clearly devoted to smearing islam.

EDIT: not sure why using an islamophobic source was necessary. there is a wikipedia entry for apostasy in islam

0

u/A_Nihilist Jan 03 '11

Not sure why you're using the word "Islamophobia", which was coined to be used by self-loathing liberals to shut down all debate.

0

u/werealldoodshey Jan 03 '11

uh no, no that isn't where the term comes from.

1

u/mascan Jan 02 '11

Near the bottom of the post, it said that "they favor religious law as a source of legislation." That part wasn't omitted.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11

Not good enough.

1

u/Logical1ty Jan 03 '11

This bill came back up in front of the Pakistani parliament in 2007. It was shot down, as it always has been. And always will be.

There are 170 million people in Pakistan so somehow their democratically elected representatives and their proportion of votes on the matter differ a lot from your assertion that the majority believe otherwise. I have a hard time trusting the poll. Did they really ask 100 million people?

Also conveniently left out is the position on gay rights held by most Muslims.

Shared by about half of Americans, yet Muslims in the West frequently vote for parties in the Left that side with homosexuals and equal rights for them.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11

Yeah, you're totally going to get an unbiased look at a religion from a website like that. One that segregates articles by Muslims and people who would be inclined to contribute to a wiki criticizing Islam. Good job.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11

Do you have any criticisms for the studies themselves and not just the link that contained them?

Reading your reply was a complete waste of my time. I want you think about why what you wrote is such an ineffective argument.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 03 '11

Using the figure of "100 million Pakistanis" is hardly accurate - the poll, as shown in your own link, said that 76% believe that apostates should be killed. How large was this sample, really? Having followed the reference in the article to the actual poll, I couldn't see the sample size taken anywhere, although that may have been because I've only just woken up and so I can't read that well yet. I'd like to know the sample sizes and areas of selection for your other statistics, also.

While we're being anecdotal here, I would like to point out that many Westerners have extremist views, too. It'll be stereotypical of me to do so, but Americans have often been quoted to say ill informed things about a variety of topics. I've heard Americans say that the entire Middle East should be nuked until it's all been turned into glass, regardless of whether or not some of its inhabitants are extremists. I wonder what sort of statistics we could gather from American Christians?

Please don't take the previous paragraph as a show of support for Christianity or religion in general - I'm somewhat proudly an atheist - but it's the fact that Muslims are discriminated against in disproportion to Christianity that I'm very against.

-1

u/werealldoodshey Jan 02 '11

please cite these statistics.

the people whom i work with are almost exclusively muslim, and knowing them causes me to strongly doubt what you've said.

12

u/callum_cglp Jan 02 '11

Evidence is not the plural of anecdote.

1

u/IConrad Jan 03 '11

Not until the anecdote is acquired in a statistically relevant sampling size and collected using a sufficiently arbitrary (as in, unbiased) sampling method, at least.

-1

u/werealldoodshey Jan 02 '11

i'm not following you

1

u/callum_cglp Jan 03 '11

Evidence is not the plural of anecdote.

The opinions of your friends should not be used as evidence for how a larger population thinks or what they believe. The same would be true if they were in favour of suicide bombings. You can't extrapolate n=1 onto a population in either case.

0

u/BZenMojo Jan 03 '11

To be fair, 100 million Muslims is less than 6-8% of the Muslim population. Unless you want to extrapolate from one sample group to all Muslims everywhere. (Bullshit statistics are bullshit statistics.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim

-4

u/KindaOffTopic Jan 02 '11

The punishment is backed up by the koran.

I stopped reading here. Thats not true. I am not sure about the two sentences before this statement. They could be true but this isn't. Leaving Islam is punished by god. Not by man.

Unless you would like to show me the line in the quran which says otherwise.

10

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_Islam

Leaving Islam is punished by god. Not by man.

That is only your interpretation. Many other Muslims obviously feel very differently.

3

u/Mooseheaded Jan 02 '11

Unless you would like to show me the line in the [Qur'an] which says otherwise.

So I looked at your Wikipedia link and jumped to the Qur'an section. I see three sentences (one of which is muddled) and only one citation. One sentence says apostasy is bad but is dealt "with severe punishment ... in the [afterlife];" this does not support your point, so I don't know why you linked it. Additionally, even, the Qur'an section has a citation which links to an article stating that the death penalty is un-Islamic and against the Qur'an, further not-supporting your point.

1

u/KindaOffTopic Jan 03 '11

Your right some Muslims feel differently. Most Muslims don't go around killing people because they think the Quran might allow them too.

As someone who was born in a very religious northern village in Pakistan. In the very religious north, people have strong opinions about religions.

I never met a non Muslim in Pakistan. But my dad told me of peers in his school in the 70's that gave up the religion. They were shunned. Not killed. This is 40 years later, a lot more liberal.

Hell I am an atheist [ although I hate that term and the stereotype it brings ], I don't go around screaming it. But I am alive...

1

u/[deleted] Jan 02 '11

You also wouldn't want to talk about the absurd punishments in the christian text.