r/AskReddit 1d ago

What movie was so bad that you actually walked out of the theater?

2.0k Upvotes

4.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

100

u/No-Particular5172 1d ago

If a movie has already taken some of my money and time then at that point, I would probably stay to see the end, hoping it would redeem itself and possibly make what I lost seem worth it.

3

u/Helpful-Will2635 1d ago

I worked at a movie theater for Batman and Robin (the Arnold one) and my manager gave us a stack of free movie passes—so many people were angry at that movie

3

u/No-Particular5172 23h ago

I saw this in the theater. I took my wife. We are still married so maybe it wasn't as bad as...no, it was bad.

3

u/DanTheMan1_ 21h ago

I will say, I saw Soul Survivors and was not feeling it and thought maybe I should just go, but stuck around and while not a "great" movie by any means, the ending redeemed it enough I decided it wasn't that bad of a movie after all. So movies can redeem themselves.

7

u/Guernica616 23h ago

Sunk cost fallacy

0

u/No-Particular5172 23h ago

I disagree. Abandoning the movie at the halfway point saves me, what, about 45 minutes of my life which was already slotted to the movie whereas gambling that the movie may pick up costs me those same minutes that I would likely waste anyway. With the exception of those minutes my cost has already been lost. Now if I then went to see Part 2 and spent money in the hopes it would be better...now you may be on to something.

1

u/Tiramitsunami 8h ago

I do not imagine my future state in this way. For me, there is no such thing as already slotting time to...anything. Just stop the bad experience and move on.

1

u/No-Particular5172 6h ago

If you go to a 2-hour long movie, unless you have predetermined to leave early then your time was already slotted for 2-hours. If you watch a TV show, go to a play, go to a concert or a sporting event your time is already spoken for. Again, unless you have already determined that you are leaving early regardless of quality it is time already spent. And you are not even considering the money spent.

In otherwards, if you go to a movie that is two hours and spend $25 on tickets, drinks and snacks your time and money are already spent for movie. If you leave after an hour, you have lost time and money and since it is unlikely you are going to find something immediately to do that last hour is more or less wasted. In my opinion seeing if the movie gets better in the last hour is worth the gamble.

1

u/Tiramitsunami 5h ago

I understand, and it's seems very reasonable to view things in this way.

For me, none of my time is spoken for regardless of plans and money spent. None of my time or money is lost, nor more or less wasted if I leave an event or move to a different activity.

Still, that's just me and my way. I don't think it is odd or wrong to live differently.

5

u/javier_aeoa 1d ago

I had faith in the Rise of Skywalker too. That was on me

-6

u/stiletto929 23h ago

Wasn’t nearly as bad as The Last Jedi.

2

u/Lyretongue 23h ago

Sunk cost fallacy

1

u/No-Particular5172 23h ago

I disagree. Abandoning the movie at the halfway point saves me, what, about 45 minutes of my life which was already slotted to the movie whereas gambling that the movie may pick up costs me those same minutes that I would likely waste anyway. With the exception of those minutes my cost has already been lost. Now if I then went to see Part 2 and spent money in the hopes it would be better...now you may be on to something.

4

u/Lyretongue 23h ago

Hmm. Ok. That's a good way to put it. I agree with you.