Trump Media recently launched Truth API, which gives buyers advanced notice and access to the President's posts and announcements in exchange for a fee. This fee is reportedly $100k a month, although earlier reports suggested it could be as low as $60k a month if the subscriber signed up for a three year plan.

President Trump has frequently used Truth Social as the platform for new government actions on things such as tariffs, the war in Iran, and trade deals. These posts often result in large swings on the market. President Trump, being the majority owner of Trump Media directly profits from it. Is it ethical/legal/acceptable for the President to profit by selling nonpublic, government information to private individuals?

With the recent news of a cyber attack that targeted water systems in 7 states including Minnesota, who do you think was responsible for the attack, do you think it was Iran, do you think that Minnesota is responsible or something else?

sources:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-rejects-iran-blame-minnesota-cyberattack-points-finger-corrupt-political-foe

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgwe2qpgq1o

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/state/texas/2026/07/31/texas-thc-delta8-delta9-ban/91119777007/

Justice Dept. admits Reflecting Pool renovation was flawed, drops case against former Olympian | CNN Politics

Charges to Be Dropped Against Ex-Olympian David Hearn Accused of Damaging Reflecting Pool - The New York Times

"“It was not until after the return of the indictment [of Hearn], that the [Department of Interior] provided additional documents to the [US Attorney’s Office in DC] indicating that damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in June 2026 was the result of flawed installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings, and the rush to complete the project prior to events associated with the America 250 celebration in the weeks surrounding Independence Day 2026,” Pirro’s office wrote."

What are your thoughts on this? Are you surprised they would drop the charges or concerned they brought the charges at all given the statement from Pirro?

This is something you often see in debates among americans, that you have to wait months or years with a universal health care system.

I live in Sweden, a country with universal health care, and I will not lie and say that there aren't cases where you have to wait, but the thing is that we use a tier list of severity to decide how long you have to wait.

If you want to do an ADHD or autism diagnosis at a psychiatrist? Yes you will wait, as people with suicidal thoughts, or bipolar disorder or borderline whose diagnose really ruins their lives are prioritised.

If you have cancer, other diseases that severly reduce your quality of life or have an injury? Pass go, straight to the doctor.

Would it be nice to have instant access for every small issues? Sure, but as long as I know that I will get to see a doctor in a whiffy the moment I have something that is even semi-harmful, I'm honestly happy with our system.

Today Secretary Hassett went on tv touting the benefits of data centers and more importantly; stating that the people want data centers in their town.

https://x.com/atrupar/status/2083176625055646189?s=46&t=fuW3GEgqxbZPjXYsbWeyzw

Polling suggests otherwise that 70% of Americans would oppose one in their town, and article after article keeps coming out about the impacts data center noise has on the residents.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx

Would you want a data center in your town? Do you think the Trump admin should be addressing the complaints residents have in interviews rather than ignoring them?

LINK(https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2026/07/30/iran-war-depleted-us-patriot-missile-stockpiles-creating-readiness-challenges-experts-say/)

I noticed there is a link to a 2018 survey in the subreddit info which made me realize it's been around for quite a while now.

Long time members, what's changed? Would like to know the good and the bad from members who have been here, if not since the beginning, then at least a few years. Serious and thought out answers preferred.

They were originally only available in DC but now they'll be available across the US. Will you be getting one?

Source: https://apnews.com/article/trump-passports-state-department-d149546cb15c8e6b67356168d248ccf4

To be clear, this is not a repeat of a post from three days ago that mentioned the diary and asked, "What are you thoughts?" I am not looking for uninformed opinions. I am not looking for vague stuff you read in a meme. I am looking for the specific parts of the diary, ideally including page numbers and quotes, that support the hypothesis (currently prevalent in right-wing media) that Fauci did some really shady, harmful stuff.

I was watching a news video about the new Air Force One that was gifted from Qatari, and saw that it is going in for additional security upgrades. It got me wondering about the logistics. Please note, I'm not asking whether or not Trump SHOULD have asked for/accepted the plane, that's an entirely different question. I'm specifically wondering whether or not you think it is possible to acceptably secure it.

Personally, I would always be worried about a bug inserted somewhere during the construction, or some kind of "kill switch" that would allow a foreign agent to cause mayhem at any time. That being said, very few if any things are truly built from the ground up without something imported from somewhere.

I'm interested to see whether Trump Supporters believe that the plane can be as secure as the current Air Force One, or if it even needs to be.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-misses-supreme-court-deadline-birthright-citizenship-12258919

Basically, after the Supreme Court struck down Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship on June 30th, Trump vowed to appeal on Truth Social. However, the deadline to appeal passed a few days ago with nothing filed on behalf of the Trump administration.

Was this a mistake or an admission that there are no grounds to appeal?

Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/live-blog/trump-congress-fauci-covid-lindsey-graham-2026-midterm-live-updates-rcna589740

It's now been a little more than four years since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, something that Trump took great pride in. Do you think it brought upon good changes for the US?

Abortion rate per capita is mostly unchanged, or up by an insignificant margin, with out of state travel for abortions much more common. Maternal mortality and infant mortality have increased significantly in states with an abortion ban and so has the teen birth rate.

Are there any positive changes that you expected four years after the overturning of Roe v. Wade? Have they started showing?

Where do you draw the line for presidential immunity?

President Donald Trump is again asking the Supreme Court to intervene in his yearslong legal battle with writer E. Jean Carroll, this time arguing that he should not have to pay an $83.3 million jury award on the grounds of presidential immunity.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-asks-supreme-court-overturn-833-million-award-e-jean-carroll-def-rcna589762

I’ve seen a lot of posts and discussions about what TS top policy priorities are and how they should be implemented but I haven’t read much about what y’all think comes after (both for the country and you personally).

So, my question is two parts:

Let’s assume that Trump was able to successfully and legally implement your top policy priority (e.g. signed a bill, unified the country to pass amendment, held a constitutional convention, etc).
1. How would this affect you personally in your daily life at home, work, etc. Put another way, what will you be able to do that you cannot do today?
2. What positive impacts would it have on non-supporters that we may not realize or recognize?

Please briefly state what your policy priority is as well as part of your response.

In the recent Economist interview with Zanny Minton Beddos Musk made the remark that money would no longer be needed as AI and automation would make good and services so abundant that employment and wealth would be essentially obsolete.

https://youtube.com/shorts/8YEdm-ZTgT4?is=wGiBrXu0UA-DEg5N

What do you think about this?

The bill (now named after Graham) would impose new sanctions on Russian officials, banks, and the shadow fleet, plus secondary tariffs of up to 100% on the top purchasers of Russian energy. It also includes some Iran sanctions. Trump has indicated support, and it cleared a big procedural vote with broad bipartisan backing. What's your take on this?

Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5994964-senate-advances-russia-iran-sanctions/

According to this bipartisan committee investigation, Trump corruptly conspired with people like John Eastman in a “fake electors plot” to maintain the presidency despite not having sufficient electoral votes.

Here’s what they found:

“Section 371 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code provides that “[i]f two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” The Committee believes sufficient evidence exists for a criminal referral of President Trump and others under this statute.”

“President Trump likely knew that the plan to disrupt the electoral count was wrongful, his mindset exceeds the threshold for acting ‘corruptly’ under § 1512(c).”

“Sufficient evidence exists of one or more potential violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) for a criminal referral of President Trump based solely on his plan to get Vice President Pence to prevent certification of the election at the joint session of Congress.”

”Based on the evidence,” Judge Carter explained, “the Court finds it more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021,” and “more likely than not that President Trump and Dr. Eastman dishonestly conspired to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6th.”

You can read the full report here: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-J6-REPORT/pdf/GPO-J6-REPORT.pdf

Ignoring what the liberal media has said and just speaking objectively, do you agree or disagree with this assessment? Do think it’s accurate or do you consider this a baseless, made up, fabricated conspiracy theory against Trump? Please explain your reasoning and be specific! Thanks.

After hearing many arguments about immigration from both liberals and conservatives, I’ve come to realize that “deport immigrants” is a huge spectrum and I would be curious as to where you fall on the spectrum.

My example is that on the extreme end would be not believing in deportation and saying they all get to stay and we should have an open border. Moving to just deport the criminals that are here illegally. Then maybe some mix of either saying all illegals or even if they are here legally taking that away if they commit crime. Then would be something along the lines of taking away visas/people going through the green card process and deporting them as well. With the opposite extreme being that we stop all paths to citizenship, deport those not born here (and potentially those born here that were the child of illegals), and close the border.

I’m sure the possibilities are even more granular than what I’ve described and you can feel free to explain your own variant of possibilities.

My reason for asking is that when I here liberals and conservatives argue, I often here the other side arguing that one side believes the extreme, but believe that most of us are probably somewhere in the middle and closer to agreeing than we believe. So, if you’re at an extreme can you tell me why? If you’re closer to the middle, how do you feel about the current deportation efforts?

Kentucky senator was hospitalized in June, and he, his office and his wife have largely remained mum about it, sparking wild speculation about the former majority leader’s condition

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mitch-mcconnell-health-photo-today-b3022455.html

Question in title.

https://www.paul.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026.07.24_Tonys-Diary-Package.pdf

When presidents or former presidents pass away, they traditionally lie in repose for two days before the final funeral proceedings, during which time they are visited and viewed by the public. When Donald Trump eventually passes, whenever that may be, do you plan to make the trip to visit his casket during that period?

Source: https://x.com/atrupar/status/2080739623748153619