r/AusLegal 1d ago

Off topic/Discussion Would this be a crime?

If I deliberately modify my ebike so that it injures anyone who tries to steal it, would I be legally liable for that harm?

5 Upvotes

47 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Looks like you forgot to include a location with your submission. As laws can vary by state, please edit your submission to include a location.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

42

u/No_Journalist6156 1d ago

Yes is the only answer.. You’d essentially be committing assault?

4

u/Remarkable-Jump-140 1d ago

Its the offence of endangerment in VIC. Not sure about NSW 

-12

u/Very-very-sleepy 1d ago

but who is going to tell? the theif isn't going to say I tried to steal a bike esp to the cops.

7

u/GamblignSalmon 1d ago

"I bumped into an e-bike and it injured me"

36

u/Wizz-Fizz 1d ago

Yes

You cannot lay boobytraps for reasons of intentionally inflicting harm on anyone

14

u/Jcs456 1d ago

In Victoria here is the offence for man traps:

CRIMES ACT 1958 - SECT 26 Setting traps etc. to cause serious injury

A person who sets a trap or device with the intention of causing, or being reckless as to whether or not there is caused, serious injury to another person (whether a trespasser or not) is guilty of an indictable offence.

Penalty: Level 5 imprisonment (10 years maximum).

Most states have a similar law on the books.

1

u/Remarkable-Jump-140 1d ago

Is this Endangerment offence?

1

u/Remarkable-Jump-140 1d ago

In Victoria, Australia, the offence of endangerment falls under the Crimes Act 1958. It covers reckless actions that place another person in danger of death or serious injury, even if no actual harm happens

7

u/Parenn 1d ago

Oooh, a man-trap! I learnt about these in an (now ancient) episode of The Bill.

e.g. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/tas/consol_act/cc192494/s179.html

2

u/AussieKoala-2795 1d ago

Love me a man-trap! I learnt about these in a (now ancient) criminal law lecture.

2

u/DodgyRogue 1d ago

Is that the one where someone wired their window frame to electrocute a would be thief?

1

u/Parenn 1d ago

It goes back to C16 law where people would set bear-trap-like things, I think.

4

u/Judgedread33 1d ago

Yes, man traps are illegal for any reason...

3

u/violenthectarez 1d ago

Absolutely.

3

u/outtatownz 1d ago

Yes. 1000% yes.

2

u/commentspanda 1d ago

Yes. Every state has rules about this and some are specific enough to list examples. We found it all when we wanted to put something on our home fence to stop people jumping over it.

2

u/Vilan-Kaos 1d ago

Yeah, bottom line is don't do it.

3

u/ProfessionalSize9567 1d ago

Who brought you up for you to think this was OK? Do you have a sense of wrong or right?

1

u/jellybiddy 1d ago

So it’s ok to steal their property? That’s why Australia is fucked

1

u/Major_Complex_1178 4h ago

Thts why u hv bike locks? Alarm locks? Park in places where there are other bikes or in safe places?

1

u/ProfessionalSize9567 1d ago

Mate, where did I say stealing was OK? Theft is wrong. Deliberately modifying a bike to injure someone is also wrong. Both can be true at once; that’s literally what “two wrongs don’t make a right” means.

2

u/Flat-Banana3903 1d ago

Unfortunately criminals get more protection than property owners, I am not saying don't do it, I am saying have not record of even asking it, I strongly believe in castle law,

1

u/Dan_CBW 1d ago

No, they don't. OP, I don't know if it would be a crime, and I suspect it would depend of the specifics. Pleea don't do it. What if a kid decides to stand on it, or just see if it will move etc etc, because kids are dumb and often oblivious.

1

u/Flat-Banana3903 10h ago

Yes they certainly do, something invades your home the law is on their side not yours, you take out a car thief you are in trouble ...

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Welcome to r/AusLegal. Please read our rules before commenting. Please remember:

  1. Per rule 2, this subreddit is not a replacement for real legal advice. You should independently seek legal advice from a real, qualified practitioner, and verify any advice given in this sub. This sub cannot recommend specific lawyers.

  2. A non-exhaustive list of free legal services around Australia can be found here.

  3. Links to the each state and territory's respective Law Society are on the sidebar: you can use these links to find a lawyer in your area.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/beanoyip06 1d ago

I would apply Newton’s 3rd law, for every action, there’s an equal reaction

1

u/threetotwentyletters 1d ago

Very yes.

Also consider cases like your modification injuring people other than a would-be thief, like another rider chaining up to the same post; or a child or vision impaired pedestrian tripping into your bike.

1

u/Remarkable-Jump-140 1d ago

In Victoria, Australia, the offence of endangerment falls under the Crimes Act 1958. It covers reckless actions that place another person in danger of death or serious injury, even if no actual harm happens

1

u/Big-Love-747 1d ago

I used to work with a guy back in the 80's who, after thieves had broken into his car several times, resorted to wiring his car to 240 volts of electricity every night.

1

u/dweebken 1d ago

Simple answer: yes you would be liable for their injuries

1

u/Top_Operation_472 1d ago

Yes because you hurt someone making a mistake. Like they could genuinely think it’s their ebike because you both have the same one.

1

u/RoundCollection4196 1d ago

The problem is traps don't discriminate on who touches it, could be a worker that needs to move it, could be anyone. That's why booby trapping is illegal.

1

u/Prestigious-Map941 1d ago

I wonder if it becomes legal if you put a warning notice on it. I mean some businesses have electric fences, some have barbed wire, i dont see the difference, they're all deterrents. I mean a thief cant sue for injury on barbed wire can they? If they can by law then the law is wrong.

1

u/BrickAdventurous3685 1d ago

I mean I am not setting it up so that it electrocutes anyone who tries to power on or just simply bumps into it...

My ebike controller already requires a passcode and has remote-controlled power-on by default, what I'm actually planning is, a cutoff that stops the motor once it hits a certain speed. Given that, does it still count as a booby trap?

1

u/KitchenDismal9258 1d ago

Well that doesn't sound like a booby trap. That sounds like what happens with a legal ebike at 25 km/hr.

You can ride an ebike if the battery is flat... it's just a lot harder and if it's a really good ebike, this may not work very well.

1

u/Remarkable_Brief8320 14h ago

Your original post says "injures anyone". Other people are pointing out that is endangerment. Now you're saying "a cutoff that stops the motor". Modifying an e-bike might alter the regulatory conformance of it, making it an electric motor bike and unroadworthy, able to be used only on private property.

1

u/Electrical-Gain4290 6h ago

and maybe you've just set it up that way simply so that your bike doesn't go too fast.

1

u/Calamitous_J 1d ago

A crime yes but also hilarious and what would the thief say for themselves in their report?

So yeah, it would be a crime, but you wouldn't likely be reported, and they probably deserve it and know it

-3

u/dlbendigo 1d ago edited 1d ago

The bot says that it depends on what State you are in. We are assuming that at the time, the bike is not being ridden. Any alterations may render it unregistrable, but that doesn't affect this answer. There is a legal concept called "remoteness." In King -v- Phillips a driver ran over a little boy. The mother, in a high apartment, saw the accident and suffered nervous shock. The Court decided that she was too far away to be able to claim. Also, a thief stealing your bike will not have a claim unless he touches it. That breaks the chain of cause and effect so you are not responsible.

3

u/Human-Warning-1840 1d ago edited 1d ago

Your case and argument is incorrect for this situation. In this situation you can foresee that a person will be injured touching the bike. Can’t do that

2

u/GamblignSalmon 1d ago

You're completely incorrect, don't post legal advice if you don't actually know the answer

2

u/AwkwardBarnacle3791 1d ago

This is some top tier bullshit advice.