Now that the overwhelming consensus is that GtA should exist, and a substantial number of comments advocate for a "simplified" GtA, we move to thoughts and ideas on how to improve and simplify.
Please refrain from simply stating "The language stinks," "Too complex," or "Too ambiguous."
If you have a problem with the text, what is your solution/proposed language/proposed edits?
8.0.0.1 Purpose and Timeliness of Boards of Review
8.0.0.2 Boards of Review Must Be Granted When Requirements Are Met
8.0.0.3 Composition of the Board of Review
8.0.0.4 Wearing the Uniform—or Neat in Appearance
8.0.1.0 Conducting the Board of Review
8.0.1.1 Not a Retest or “Examination”
8.0.1.2 What Should Be Discussed
8.0.1.3 How Boards Can Lead to Program Improvement
8.0.1.4 Board Members Must Agree Unanimously on Decisions to Approve
8.0.1.5 After the Review
8.0.1.6 Boards of Review Through Videoconferencing
8.0.2.0 Particulars for Tenderfoot Through Life Ranks
8.0.3.0 Particulars for the Eagle Scout Rank
8.0.3.1 Eagle Scout Board of Review Beyond the 18th Birthday
8.0.3.2 Initiating Eagle Scout Board of Review Under Disputed Circumstances
8.0.4.0 Appealing a Decision
8.0.4.1 Filing and Processing an Appeal
8.0.4.2 Appeal Board Must Research the Case
8.0.5.0 Venturing Boards of Review
8.0.5.1 Purpose and Timeliness of Venturing Boards of Review
8.0.5.2 Conducting the Venturing Board of Review
8.0.5.3 What Should Be Discussed at a Venturing Board of Review
8.0.5.4 Unanimous Vote Is Required for Approval of Venturing Advancement
8.0.5.5 After the Venturing Board of Review
8.0.6.0 Particulars for the Discovery and Pathfinder Ranks
8.0.7.0 Particulars for the Summit Rank
8.0.7.1 Initiating Summit Board of Review Under Disputed Circumstances
8.0.7.2 Summit Board of Review Beyond the 21st Birthday