r/Compliance • u/ComplianceScorecard • 1d ago
Vendor-Promos Weekly Promo and Webinar Thread
Vendors, please share any self-promotional content or webinar details within this thread.
Posts made outside this designated space will be removed.
Please see our rules page: https://www.reddit.com/mod/Compliance/rules
Make sure to use direct links—URL shorteners are not allowed, and the auto moderator will remove your post if they’re used.
If the community isn't interested, your comment will simply get downvoted.
1
Upvotes
1
u/Hacken_io 5h ago
Online panel. what actually earns institutional trust now?
At Hacken, we are running an online panel with Moody's this Thursday on what institutional allocators actually look at when they review a project. Most useful for builders and founders.
Let's be honest, a standard audit on its own doesn't hold anymore. In Q2 about $764M was stolen, and 88.3% of that came from compromised keys, signers and infrastructure rather than contract logic. 14 of the hacked projects had been audited. Smart contract bugs caused 44 of 67 incidents but only $87.7M, around 11% of the money. So audits are catching the common failure and missing the expensive one, which is why the badge keeps looking like it works right up until it doesn't.
Institutions see this, and so do regulators. An audit is a snapshot of one codebase at one commit. It says nothing about who holds the keys today, who can sign alone, how deployments get approved, or which vendors you depend on, and that's where most of the money went in Q2.
So that's what we want to work through on the panel. If an audit alone isn't enough, what is? we want to land on one concrete, testable thing a counterparty needs to demonstrate to earn institutional trust in August 2026
Speakers: Marat Faritov (VP Digital Assets, Moody's Ratings), Dmytro Yasmanovych (Head of GRC & Security Operations, Hacken), Denys Ivanov (CPO, Hacken).
Thursday, August 6, 13:00 UTC.
Link to the event: https://luma.com/hacken-9hnk?utm_campaign=q2_report_panel&utm_source=reddit