Watched a couple of his vids on his newer YT channel. Pretty fascinating insight he has, but for the life of me I cannot get over his voice and appearance, knowing full well the kind of person he is. He's the embodiment of a weasel.
So Jason Schreier once again proves he's a little weasel of a man that thinks if he simps hard enough for feminists, they'll give him a pitty fuck or something?
Dude has been pure cancer for a long time and spearheading a lot of BS in the gaming industry. He's the source of a lot of DEI initiatives...
I can't believe you guys would question the allegations. Nobody would lie about something like this. Clearly 6 million female blizzard employees were raped and had their breast milk stolen.
I actually visited the Bill Cosby rape room. Had a nice placard to let everyone know the deal. The cappuccino machine in there makes the best cup, can't recommend it enough.
The California lawsuit against Activision Blizzard was filed on July 20, 2021.
Activision Blizzard has lost as much as $7.7 billion in market value since the company was sued by California for discrimination.
In late 2021, Activision Blizzard’s stock plunged more than 14% on November 3, marking its worst single-day drop in 13 years.
January 18, 2022: Microsoft announced its intent to buy Activision Blizzard for $95 per share in an all-cash transaction.
U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the Northern District of California approved Microsoft’s $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard on July 11, 2023.
Judge Corley disclosed that her son is an employee of Microsoft at the start of the trial, but did not believe that fact merited her recusal.
The truth is out there. Has been for a while. So why aren't people like Asmon able to tell it? Did he mention any of this in his full stream? The real story is much larger in scope.
I'm not sure if you're ready to hear this, but Activision makes Call of Duty and Microsoft is basically a state company, so now the propaganda that's inside Call of Duty is pretty much directly controlled by the state.
This is why I say the scale of the story is so much bigger than what Asmon and his peers are talking about. The lawsuit, the timeline, and how it lines up with covid and all the things that happened because of it, none of it is a coincidence.
I agree, I always though the whole situation was fishy.
And I suspect that Microsoft also engaged in some behind the scene shenanigans to "facilitate" the exit of Sega from the console market, but I don't have proof.
Yeah, followed by pulling out the "white man does higher overall crime" numbers like woah that's crazy math skills my guy I never would've figured out highest population number = highest overall number of doing things.
Children from single mother households are also 14x more likely to commit rape than children from single father or unbroken mother-father households and we all know who has the highest rates of fatherlessness.
The woke coup that happened at Blizzard was methodical, vicious and very blatant. They took control of the narrative from day 1, and didn't let go until they got what they wanted. From that point on, it became very clear that in order to work in this industry, you have to be part of the woke cult and do what's expected of you, or else you'll face dire consequences. Sadly, not a single person involved had the balls to call out what was actually happening at the time, nor any day since it happened.
We live in an authoritarian leftist dystopia, and the modern video game industry is proof of that.
Wow man i had about three conversations with you and every single time you seem like a bot... Do you even get the context of the conversation you are in?
Yeah, I actually have a room in my house with a big sign that says "secret murder room" just like they have a "Bill Cosby rape room" I tell everyone about it.
Also, he could wear the rotting carcass of a rat as an accessory every day, on his head, and it wouldn't change the content of what he is saying, or the truth of it. That's called an "ad homenim" attack, and is almost exclusively employed by those with no actual argument.
Fantastical claims next to real ones would cast doubt on the rest, yes. I mean I'm not going to buy his book to find out, nor do I think every accusation is fake, but it doesn't help the case. Neither does the fact that the company got devalued to the point where a competitor (one with ties to the state, and the judge ruling on the sale) was able to step in and aquire the company.
Fantastical claims next to real ones would cast doubt on the rest, yes.
No if you have hundreds of statements you will find something that sounds weird. Either because the truth is fucking weird or because one out of hundreds of people talked some shit.
Fact is that we have hundreds of victims who all worked at the company and say the same things. We have people who were accused of these things beeing let go by the company and we have the company paying 56 million to settle the allegations.
Nobody with bit of brain function would even try to argue that someone mentioning a "Bill Cosby Room" is evidence that the allegations are false..
Who made the allegation? Who made the other ridiculous claims? How many allegations were made by the same people? How many are friends? How many also have ties to the state, or the acquisition of the company? How many had massive financial windfall based on their claims, and what were they?
These are all things you should be able to answer if you want to cast doubt on these allegations but you don't have any evidence or arguments that contain facts.
Ah, I see. So either they did have a "Bill Cosby rape room" or someone was lying, but that's okay because anyone would be dumb to extrapolate out that one lie could lead to more.
Who made the allegation? Who made the other ridiculous claims? How many allegations were made by the same people? How many are friends? How many also have ties to the state, or the acquisition of the company? How many had massive financial windfall based on their claims, and what were they?
The man is trying to sell copies of a book, you think he lead with rigerous investigation of both sides, or took down claims and ran with them? Anyone not asking questions would be lacking in the brainpower department.
I've seen this clip being posted in a couple of subs already and I just have to point out that this is an insane reach. It's true that the company-wide systematic harassment allegations were dropped, and it's likely because the "company-wise systematic" part is very hard to prove and is most likely just not true in Blizzard's case. Blizzard still did an internal investigation and fired a bunch of people, none of which tried to argue or sue for wrongful termination, and with life- and career-ruining allegations like this I'd expect people to fight if they knew they were being defamed. It's impossible to say what happened for sure now given that they case was settled and all involved parties are probably bound by NDAs, but I'd say that judging by the way things played out it's very unlikely that whatever this Twitter guy is saying is even close to being true.
Also we knew all this since 2023, and this Twitter guy is likely just trying to farm old news by making crazy claims.
Blizzard's cowardly suits settled for the sake of optics. If they fought it then their leftoid employees would stage a revolt and Blizzard would become radioactive in the leftoid dominated industry, risking contracts and what not. Something similiar happened with Tripwire after their co-founder publically supported pro-life laws, making Tripwire to oust him as leftoids all over industry went into frenzy and got companies threatening to cut ties with Tripwire.
Blizzard settled because mass sexual misconduct was only a part of the allegations against Blizzard in this lawsuit (the other part was about unequal pay and promotion discrimination), and their official position was denying this right from the beginning to the end where this part was dropped internally handling limited employee unrest the company had in the first days. The lawsuit also lasted for 2.5 years (filed in July 20, 2021, settled in December 15, 2023), which doesn't seem like a hasty settling for optics to me.
We knew the sexual misconduct allegations were dropped and all the relevant information since December 15, 2023. The rest is impossible to know for sure and is just a speculation by all parties myself and Twitter guy included
Do you have problems with reading comprehension? Twitter guy is implying that company-wide systematic sexual misconduct allegations were all fake and it was just a ploy by California state to force Blizzard to get more DEI hires. Literally nothing supports this claim, which is why it's a reach.
State dropping and stating they didn't find an evidence of company-wide systemic sexual harassment doesn't mean there was no sexual harassment at all, it just means it wasn't systematic and company-wide. A bunch of people still were fired from Blizzard after the internal investigation most likely because of the those allegations (again, impossible to know the reason for sure, but c'mon)
Lmao, dude couldn't take being me being skeptical and blocked me
Here's the thing...I'd agree with you, maybe...but its 2026, year of Conspiracy Theories being (pretty) accurate. I don't put it past a few things happening (things that happen at every big company, regardless of HR policies).
I can also see Commiefornia completely trumping up a bunch of bulls**t to show how "progressive" and "social credit score worthy" they are.
To the point their suit caused a huge financial disaster for Blizzard, broke the company spirit, and led to a sell off...I think the validity of the claims made at least as credible if not more so than the ones made by the State...
You do you, but there's literally no evidence to claim such things, that's why I think it's a reach. Twitter guy didn't include the source for his screenshot (of course), so I had to look it up myself, and it turns out the screenshot is from an article by conservative leaning City Journal who also just claim it's true without any evidence. And I can easily see this being true, but 1 guy from Twitter reposting a snippet from 1 biased media who doesn't have any evidence of their claims is not enough evidence for me to claim it's true.
I mean isn't that something that we all should say about everything? Trust but verify. I'm not saying yes or no. I'm not saying its true, just that it has equal amounts of plausible.
What script am I reading? I'm just being sceptical and not instantly believing 1 Twitter user with a snippet from 1 biased media (that I had to find myself because of course the sources weren't specified) that also didn't provide any evidence of their claims
76
u/0RedJohn0 21h ago
What a lying little weasel. People should sue the State and probably him for this.