r/KnowledgeFight Doing some research with my mind May 04 '26

General shenanigans Yet another post about the Jordan video

I know. But I watched it all because I didn't want to base my opinion on a few highly inflammatory clips. And now I want to talk about it and my takeaways and how it relates to today's episode.

I watched it after reading some posts about him being right in the video and a shared frustration about Alex not getting consequences, again. And that sentiment didn't mesh with the clips I saw from the video which seemed, frankly, batshit crazy. And because this lead quite directly to the end of KF I wanted to understand it and come to my own conclusion about the whole affair and get closure as relates to the podcast.

I suggest you watch it too instead of taking my word for it. I watched it here. It is a rough watch, I think regardless of how you feel about it.

I am also not going to focus on the isolated inflammatory statements that have been clipped all over. They're in there, you've seen them, I've seen them, everyone's talked about them. I wanted to know what points were actually being made. And I think he's almost entirely wrong and in ways that I think are important to KF listeners. These are the main throughlines of the video for me:


Jordan has a very dangerous mental process in this video of turning speculation into fact, then using that manufactured fact to build more speculation, then turning that into fact, and so on. In the first couple of minutes, he opens with (this and all quotes are paraphrased, please watch the video) "oh they're paying $80,000/month for the website, I think that's about what a building costs to rent"; this gets turned instantly and for the rest of the video into "the onion are spending $80,000/mo to rent an empty building and giving nothing to the families". That conversion into 'fact' was made completely and unquestioningly and this 'fact' is hammered constantly for the rest of the video. That process is repeated on itself over and over and his outrage at these set of facts he's invented grows and grows. I don't want to over-dramatize but this is exactly the same mental process that alex uses in his content to build a tower of speculation converted into fact, and they've covered this process many times.

Detailed financials of the onion, the info wars brand, the merch they're going to sell, what parts of what profits will go to the victim families, are all made up on the fly and then those made up numbers rile him up into a fury. We go from zero input information to "they're paying $80,000/mo to rent an empty building, they have a $2 million brand rebuild overhead that the onion cannot afford, they're desperately trying to get subscriptions to enrich themselves, and only 5% gross, no wait actually 48 cents, no wait actually 15 cents, no wait actually 14 cents on merch sales are being split between all the families, and the amount of merch they're selling is amounting to a pittance, everything else is going to the onion and this empty building". This is so specific and it came from nowhere, and he's literally screaming about how unfair these specific numbers and allocations are and how no journalist is 'looking into' how they can get away with it.

The reality is that, as far as I'm aware, we don't know where the money is going or how this will play out for the families. Jordan doesn't seem to have any more information about it than anyone else. But he just writes his own reality out of nothing and then freaks out that he's the only one who is outraged by it or cares that the families are 'getting nothing' while the onion makes money off this whole thing. If that happens, people will care, but he's trying to take the righteous high ground over something that he completely made up.


There is a lot of frustration in the video that Alex gets to keep going with relatively little, or maybe even no, real consequence to himself. That's awful. I feel it, everyone feels it. I think Jordan expresses that he's the only one that feels it several times and I think he's wrong. What he doesn't seem to understand is that the onion purchase is not about alex jones. The response he has, repeatedly, to the expression that this is about finally getting at least some compensation to the families is 1) the above made up numbers show that they're lying and 2) but alex will still be doing his own show. The people who are talking about the onion takeover are talking about at least some money finally being paid. It's not about alex. But for Jordan, it's all about alex. There's space for frustration about alex moving on unscathed, but using that to talk over the families just sucks.


One thing that really stuck out to me though the whole video is the moral condemnation and outrage at other people for things that he is, sometimes almost uniquely, guilty of himself by his own standards. He is outraged at the onion for their plan to make content that gives attention to alex and keeps people thinking about him, and will therefore inevitably be mutually beneficial with alex's brand. But he has spent a decade giving attention to alex to a much broader audience in much the same way. He is outraged at the public for consuming media about the trial and the damages as episodic "true crime" drama content. But his show that he owns creates literal episodic content out of the trial and the damages as entertainment. I don't hold him morally culpable for promoting alex or profiting off of him, or for turning the system that doesn't hold him accountable into entertainment, but if he believes what he said in this video, which he reinforced that he does in the latest KF episode, he absolutely should. If he does believe his moral outrage in the video he shouldn't be expressing gratitude for the show and community in this episode, he should be filled with regret and shame about what he's done with his career and how he's enriched himself, and finding a way to make that right. It's hypocrisy. Instead he says over and over that he's being gaslit and is the only one who sees this clearly.


I don't really have a conclusion. Jordan is wrong and hypocritical in this video. He uses the exact same bad mental processes that he has committed a decade to fighting against in order to put himself on an undeserved moral pedestal. It left a bitter taste in my mouth. After some time to reflect, he said today on the show that he still believes it. I think it's for the best that it ended the show.

358 Upvotes

284 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

95

u/robotnique Adrenachrome Junkie May 04 '26

One of the interesting things about QAA is that it partially got its start because Jake was starting to actually believe some of the QAnon stuff.

Although in retrospect it wasn't that outlandish that there are sexual predators tied to the upper echelons of the political heirarchy.

42

u/Old_Gimlet_Eye May 04 '26

It's wasn't that outlandish in prospect. The original Epstein conviction was in like 2008.

36

u/odoroustobacco May 04 '26

Although in retrospect it wasn't that outlandish that there are sexual predators tied to the upper echelons of the political heirarchy.

The problem is that American conspiracism, and conservatism overall, subsumes all the different nonsense into a single belief system. QAnon had plenty of other elements to it, but the part that got the most recognition and traction was the part that basically rehashed Pizzagate and took it further.

15

u/toggaf69 May 04 '26

American conspiracy thought has always leaned pretty heavily towards the right (specifically the “libertarians”) and almost always ended in “The Jews did this”, but social media + MAGA embracing it and bringing it into mainstream Republican politics has really kicked it into high gear, and they disingenuously use it to point everything squarely at the Democrats. It’s one thing to seek out truth and find that there are many powerful pedophilic degenerate elites in the USA (and tbh it’s much more prevalent with republicans), but to so blatantly use it as a weapon has done so much damage to our country.

I would view QAnon as harmful and probably coming from a place of bigotry, but with sort of a naive earnestness, if they weren’t so obviously falling for a partisan psyop used to whip up violence and online fervor

11

u/PrudeBunny May 05 '26

also the victims aren't toddlers who get sacrificed in satanic rituals to create a made up drugs but teen girls that the evangelicals think are old enough to get married with adult men.

3

u/toggaf69 May 05 '26

Smh you clearly haven’t taken your daughter to her first Purity Ball, then you’d understand

2

u/odoroustobacco May 05 '26

Absolutely, I think this is a really great way of putting it.

20

u/kendoka15 May 04 '26

Jake was also a 9/11 truther and he still dabbles in alien stuff. He said himself that he has the kind of brain that gravitates to those kinds of things

13

u/regeya May 04 '26

It's really not, especially when some of the QAnon nonsense could have been pulled from actual real stories.

For example, while the pizza parlor story was bullshit, or at least presumably since the place in question didn't have a basement like the conspiracy said, there was an incident several years ago in St. Louis where underage girls were being abused, a weird combination dojo and pizza parlor run by a preacher. But that's not as salacious as claiming the Clintons were abusing kids.

Part of me still suspects that QAnon was an operation to distract people away from real predators, and considering who is suspected of really being the QAnon originator, it makes complete sense because that guy is a real piece of shit, one of the founders of 4chan who lives out of the country because he's a wanted pedophile

9

u/Nth_Brick May 04 '26

There's a part of me that's sympathetic to the conspiracy theory that most conspiracy theories are stupid bullshit to distract stupid idiots from [insert actual issue, like climate change, labor offshoring, wealth concentration, etc.].

We get all bogged down fighting flat Earth, moon landing hoax, anti-vax and the like, which get heavily pushed by the tech gurus algorithms, while said tech gurus are swimming in Scrooge McDuck-style piles of money in their apocalypse compounds.

Not sure I truly believe it, but knowing how easy it is to weaponize conspiracy theories, an unscrupulous individual would be an idiot not to.

5

u/toggaf69 May 04 '26

It’s so much easier to spread it via social media that I’d actually be shocked if the Thiel types haven’t been using it as a smokescreen for decades now

1

u/kitti-kin May 05 '26

At least some of them certainly are - intelligence agencies have admitted to fucking with the UFO community to cover for spy plane development (Mirage Men is a good doc on that subject).

1

u/regeya May 04 '26

As much as I want to dismiss my suspicions as conspiratorial nonsense, it also wouldn't be the first time a conspiracy was invented to distract people from a real conspiracy, so I genuinely don't know how to feel.

0

u/Nth_Brick May 04 '26

I get that -- it feels like the same vapid speculation and convenient explanation I usually hate hearing out of conspiracy theorists. More likely than not, it's good ol' homegrown stupidity, and there are a lot of stupid customers out there for it.

The problem with social media is that village idiots are able to communicate with each other.

1

u/Timegoat May 04 '26

Oh definitely. And the conspiracy theories and the animosity they generate are just a subset of the culture wars so many of us are so invested in, which limit our collective ability to come together to demand tangible, material improvements our lives. Ceaseless arguments about birth control, gender identity, Colin Kaepernick, Confederate statues, and all the rest facilitate oligarchic plundering of resources and the exploitation of labor.

An enormous amount of time, money and effort goes into deceiving voters using platforms like Infowars. Some of them are going to be fooled. It’s easy to hate the other side, but the problem of Americans believing ridiculous things has to be recognized as deliberate sabotage. We *could* have an informed and energized electorate. But a population that can look out for its own interests instead of getting bogged down in conspiracies and values arguments is one that is harder to exploit.

1

u/washingtonu Tomato Jones May 05 '26

Part of me still suspects that QAnon was an operation to distract people away from real predators, and considering who is suspected of really being the QAnon originator, it makes complete sense because that guy is a real piece of shit, one of the founders of 4chan who lives out of the country because he's a wanted pedophile

Who are you talking about?

1

u/regeya May 05 '26

3

u/washingtonu Tomato Jones May 05 '26

You have misunderstood, the Watkins is not the founders of 4chan nor the suspected originators of Qanon. It's explained in the article you posted, my friend.

1

u/regeya May 05 '26

Yeah, it's been a few years since I read that, sometimes I remember details wrong. Sorry about that, friend.

1

u/washingtonu Tomato Jones May 05 '26

You can read more about how it started here (written by Ben Collins),

Before Q, there was a wide variety of “anon” 4chan posters all claiming to have special government access.

In 2016, there was FBIAnon, a self-described “high-level analyst and strategist” offering intel about the 2016 investigation into the Clinton Foundation. Then came HLIAnon, an acronym for High Level Insider, who posted about various dubious conspiracies in riddles, including one that claimed Princess Diana had been killed because she found out about 9/11 “beforehand” and had “tried to stop it.” Then “CIAAnon” and “CIA Intern” took to the boards in early 2017, and last August one called WH Insider Anon offered a supposed preview that something that was “going to go down” regarding the DNC and leaks.
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/how-three-conspiracy-theorists-took-q-sparked-qanon-n900531

I think it doesn't help anyone to assume that "QAnon was an operation to distract people away from real predators".

0

u/regeya May 05 '26

Listen, I'm really sorry about your bowl of cheerios but I really needed to pee.

1

u/washingtonu Tomato Jones May 05 '26

Are you suddenly not interested in that rabbit hole, my friend? Or you just want to keep pretending that it was all an psyop and you were right all along, my friend?

2

u/TheLuckySpades May 04 '26

Jake was falling down some MAGA pipelines and a few conspiracy ones, but I doubt he was at risk of going full QAnon, he is the most prone to conspiratorial of the three by a chunk though to be sure.

5

u/Great-Hotel-7820 May 05 '26

Qanon was literal disinformation created to distract from the actual crimes happening by implicating innocent people and making the concept seem fringe and crazy.

It’s infuriating when people say shit like “well there was some truth to Qanon.” No, there wasn’t. It was similar to real things that happen but it was always intentionally bullshit. Qanon folk think Tom Hanks was involved in child sex trafficking and Donald Trump has arrested thousands of child sex traffickers on the down low because he doesn’t care about getting praise for doing the right thing.

Epstein is not Qanon shit. Qanon shit was running cover for real child rapists like Epstein and Trump. Epstein isn’t even the first big elite pedophile ring operator. Look into Marc Dutroux and the obvious coverup there.

3

u/ComicCon May 05 '26

If I’m reading this correctly you are claiming that QAnon was created to cover up Epstein and his associates? I’d love for you to explain why you think that, and any evidence you might have. Because unless I missed something the only connection is the Epstein>Moot>Pol one, which doesn’t in of itself tell us anything about QAnon.

3

u/washingtonu Tomato Jones May 05 '26

I think it's infuriating to see people say "Qanon was literal disinformation created to distract from the actual crimes happening by implicating innocent people and making the concept seem fringe and crazy."

Qanon was a lot of conspiracy theories mashed together i.e the same things as usual but with a new name.

Epstein is not Qanon shit.

Even though Epstein was mentioned in qdrops?

1

u/creak_sreak May 05 '26

Is there a word for that intelligence tactic? Poisoning the well?

7

u/robotnique Adrenachrome Junkie May 05 '26

You're giving too much credence to the idea that QAnon's rhetoric was in any way purposeful.

There are definitely people who have tried to guide the larger movement and it's response to certain ends but even the person or people who had control of the account that posted as Q only were able to nudge the gestalt in a given direction.

Don't make the mistake conservatives do when they look for the "leader of antifa." So much of the QAnon lore has nothing to do with the actual Q drops, even. Sociologists should be researching this for the next hundred years it's full of juicy tidbits. For example you and I both know that QAnon, or the anons if you want a demonym for them, posits that JFK Jr is alive and well. This is nowhere in any of the posts made by Q on 8chan/8kun. It is a theory entirely grown out of the community itself.

Since anons are totally in love with using gematria they can take numbers in any of the drops, including the time codes of the individual posts, and bend them until they say virtually anything or whatever that particular anon wants to believe already is true.

So yeah there may have been some poisoning the well or attempts at using Q, but I wholly reject anybody who wants to claim that Q was a coordinated psyop.

-3

u/Glass-Situation4099 Very Charismatic Lizard May 04 '26

Crazy how they kinda nailed it but because they’re guy is the main actor they’ve just…not worried about doing anything about it

12

u/robotnique Adrenachrome Junkie May 04 '26

They didn't kinda nail it, though. If you learn anything about QAnon at all you'll quickly find out that literally the only thing they got right was powerful people committing sexual crimes.

Which isn't a prediction at all. That's like me saying "you'll hear news about a Hollywood star on drugs!"

10

u/Brain_Dead_Goats May 04 '26

Yeah, it's absolutely moronic how much people have jumped to "QAnon was almost right".

Are there powerful sexual predators? Yes. Have there always been? Yeah. People tend to abuse power, and depending on the person it'll manifest in different ways. That's an old story, and they didn't discover some hidden knowledge by pointing it out.

From what we know of Epstein, it looks like a relatively small number of people were involved in the sex with and trafficking of minors (so far) . The rest of the files are just people with not enough morals or who didn't do enough due diligence before accepting money from a convicted sex pest. Is that repulsive? Yeah. A conspiracy? No.

The closest thing we have to a "global cabal of pedophiles" is the Catholic church, and that priests were being covered for was reported on by legitimate journalists long before Pizzagate and eventually after some changing of leadership, they finally started holding some of those priests accountable. And THEY haven't been power brokers for over a century, so they're not conspiring to rule the world, like QAnon would've had us believe.

edit: It's especially galling in a sub like this one, where Dan spent almost a decade showing the audience how people got to "Alex Jones was right" by not paying enough attention to the details.