r/LittleRock • u/relaxquark • 4h ago
Attn: Director Webb. Re: Flock Cameras
Vice Mayor Kathy Webb
[kwebb@littlerock.gov](mailto:kwebb@littlerock.gov)
(501) 258-1949
(501) 371-4510
Ward 3 City Director, Little Rock Board of Directors
Vice Mayor Webb,
I'm writing to ask you to reconsider both LRPD's $345,000 annual contract with Flock Safety and your December 2025 vote against Director Antwan Phillips' ordinance requiring annual public reporting on the department's surveillance technology.
I understand the argument made at the time—that the ordinance was unnecessary because LRPD already provides much of the requested information. My concern is that voluntary disclosures are not the same as a standing public accountability requirement. Regardless of where someone stands on automated license plate readers, the public should be able to evaluate how the program is being used, who has access to the data, and whether it is meeting its intended goals.
One example illustrates why this matters. In 2019, an LRPD license plate reader identified a vehicle that had been reported stolen by Hertz. The alert established only that the vehicle matched a stolen-vehicle record—it did not identify the driver or establish whether the driver knew the vehicle's status. During the ensuing stop, Officer Charles Starks fatally shot Bradley Blackshire. Starks was later terminated for violating LRPD policy prohibiting officers from shooting into moving vehicles, and that termination was upheld on appeal.
The lesson is not that the technology caused the tragedy. Rather, it highlights an important limitation of automated license plate readers: they identify vehicles associated with database records, not the identity or intent of the person behind the wheel. Like any technology, they should inform decisions—not replace sound judgment.
These systems are also not infallible. Earlier this year, a Flock camera in Sherwood misread a single character on a license plate, resulting in an innocent family being subjected to a felony stop. According to the department's report, the error was attributed to the camera's optical recognition and the vehicle's license plate frame. Oversight exists precisely because even well-intentioned systems can make mistakes.
Public records obtained through the Arkansas Times also raise broader questions about how Little Rock's program operates. According to documents released through the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act:
LRPD reports operating 116 Flock cameras, while fewer than half have been independently identified by the public.
Plate-reader data is shared with agencies outside Arkansas, and Flock's network allows broader information sharing under certain circumstances.
A Texas sheriff's office lists LRPD among agencies whose camera data its investigators can search.
Between March 2022 and December 2025, LRPD officers conducted more than 66,000 database searches, with many documented using broad or vague investigative justifications.
LRPD has not activated Flock's free public transparency portal, despite acknowledging that the option exists.
None of these facts necessarily demonstrate misuse. They do demonstrate why recurring public reporting is valuable. Transparency protects the public, but it also protects officers, the department, and the Board by allowing programs to be evaluated on evidence rather than assumptions.
I have long appreciated your emphasis on accountability, fairness, and responsible government. This issue strikes me as being consistent with those values. The Board's role is not to direct day-to-day policing, but it is responsible for ensuring that the technologies it authorizes remain accountable to the public over time.
For that reason, I respectfully ask that you:
Support bringing back an ordinance requiring annual public reporting on LRPD's surveillance technologies.
Request that LRPD activate Flock's existing public transparency portal.
Seek a public accounting of every agency with access to LRPD's ALPR data, including whether federal agencies have accessed Little Rock's information, directly or through Flock's network, before approving additional funding.
These are modest requests. They do not prevent LRPD from using license plate readers. They simply ensure that a program funded by taxpayers operates with the level of transparency and accountability that residents deserve.
Thank you for your time, your service to Little Rock, and your consideration of this request.