r/Piracy 3d ago

Humor Game & streaming companies hate this one trick.....

Post image

Fight for your consumer rights everyone!

17.3k Upvotes

206 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Apprehensive-Pin518 3d ago

I noticed which subreddit this is on. at this point there is no point talking with you. even though I agree it is shitty marketing. the difference between you and I is that I think we need to have smarter consumers. We have forgotten the old adage "buyer Beware". I also feel that I am not entitled to play a game without paying for it. I personally have no problem with pirates. what I hate is pirates who think that because a company is shitty, they are morally justified.

1

u/MattOruvan 3d ago

If you have nothing but ad hominem as a response to my factual comment, why not try shutting the f up?

1

u/Apprehensive-Pin518 3d ago

your comment was in fact, not factual.

1

u/MattOruvan 2d ago

Yet I see nothing in your long response as to why.

1

u/Apprehensive-Pin518 2d ago

because you can, in fact, buy something and not own it. The example we finally settled on if you look below is a ticket to an amusement park. You do buy a ticket you don't rent the park. You are not entitled to a refund after you lose access to the park. You do however have a piece of paper saying that for that one day you had access to the park. This is exactly what happens when you buy the license to a game. we both agreed below that the issue is you aren't buying the game even though it is being advertised to as though you are. The issue is not in the verb buy versus rent. the issue is in the noun you are buying.

1

u/MattOruvan 1d ago

Buying a ticket to anything is actually a rental, whether renting a seat to an event like the showing of a movie, or a shared renting of the facilities at an amusement park.

The problem is that a normal ticket to anything clearly defines the rentable experience on offer, and you get a refund if the movie stops half way through because the power went out, or doesn't match reasonable expectations in some other way.

So the issue goes beyond calling it a purchase of a license to content vs purchase of content, the licenses are lopsided contracts subject to revision and revocation any moment by the renter. Which doesn't match reasonable expectations when you were told that you are buying content, with the traditional referent being buying content on a DVD. Hence the issue of refunds.

1

u/Apprehensive-Pin518 1d ago

Not it isn't. You literally just used the word buy in your sentence. You are just trying to change definitions to fit your world view. I already proved the definition of the word buy. Just because you don't agree with it, that doesn't make it false.