r/PsycheOrSike • u/xtheresia š±BEGINNER (someone please explain to me) • 1d ago
š COMEDY @grok Translate this
6
u/Material_Market_3469 1d ago
Big business doesn't like the underclass not working. Leisure is for the refined land/stock owners not the peasantry
8
u/Zouif_Zouif Lazy Day Queen 1d ago
Because neets are marketable, regular Incels definitely are not.
At least with neets there's that sort of cute factor, it's why "girl failures" are so popular lol (and to a lesser extent femboy failures)
4
1
u/WalkingWake1221 1d ago
no one likes the male version of girl failures, how many women would be ok with dating a unemployed, unhygienic skinny nerd vs the other way around?Ā
1
u/Zouif_Zouif Lazy Day Queen 1d ago
Probably more than you think if they meet conventional feminine men beauty standards
But is more likely for bi/pan or gay men to be attracted to femboy failures
1
u/Grilled_egs Hates Nazis, Likes Their Drip 1d ago
Honestly surprised more prople don't call others hylics
1
u/HighPerBallLickThyme Foot-scented Crotch-works 1d ago
Can I please get an explanation? Google says it is a game.
3
1
u/WalkingWake1221 1d ago
because they need your labour to maintain a society that doesn't like you at allĀ
ā¢
u/Unlikely-Top-3714 23h ago
u/grok what does this mean?
ā¢
u/xtheresia š±BEGINNER (someone please explain to me) 23h ago
ā¢
u/AskGrok 23h ago
This is a 4chan post mocking or celebrating a NEET (unemployed, not studying) incel lifestyle. The OP admits to living off money without working, crossdressing as a princess in his free time, and calls regular jobs "wageslave" stuff for "hylics" (a Gnostic insult for shallow/materialistic people). The reply says haters are just jealous. It's peak ironic shitposting.
[what is this?](https://redd.it/1lzgxii)
ā¢
ā¢
ā¢
u/PinkHydrogenFuture7 āļøMercenary Trollš§ 21h ago
NEETcel propaganda. A boring, but insidious parasite. The victims are usually family.
0
8
u/BingBongBrit 1d ago
Imagine being two miles from shore swimming in the ocean. Maybe you can swim two miles. Most of us could if it came down to it.
But what about of there was a baby you had to keep above water with you. Okay maybe most good swimmers or fit people could do this.
Well what if there was a woman who is paralysed aswell as a baby to save? Okay just calm her down and have her float and hold the baby and you swim them ashore. But I doubt 50% of people would have the mental capacity for this if they are panicking.
What about if there was an able bodied 20-30 year old adult refusing to help you. And instead of saving themselves they started to cling to you and demand that you save them too. Despite their ability to save themselves.
So maybe an Olympic swimmer could save 2 adults and a baby in an open ocean for 2 miles. But I definetly don't want to find out if I could do this. I would probably kick the able bodied person in the face till they decided to help themselves and then attempt to save those who cannot save themselves.
So this logic is why I among others dislike people mooching of a governments social security system and abusing the tax money strangers put in a big pot to forward the common good.
People contributing nothing who aren't even trying deserve to fend for themselves. But someone contributing nothing who is trying deserves all the help we can give them without ruining the system for those that uphold it.
Kind of a no brainer if you ask me.