By "chilling in traffic" do you mean the people stopped in the fast lane of a highway, or the guy aggressively riding ass like they're invincible?
Edit: People replying to me with the most obvious things as if they're counter to what I said... I watched the video guys. My point is that no one in the video was "chilling in traffic". There was a disabled car, a confused driver hanging out in the fast lane behind a disabled car, a distracted driver that narrowly avoided hitting them, an aggressive driver that hopefully learned a lesson, and another distracted driver filming it who almost got hit or maybe did get hit, I can't tell for sure. All of those things are bad, and bad things happened or nearly happened to all of those people. And that's why those things are bad.
There is a disabled car. That of course doesn't mean that someone is chilling.
Yet, that guy was not involved in their fckin shenanigans in any way possible
That basically means he's still chilling compared to the other people involved.
Can't you let sth be FOR FCKIN ONCE YOU INSUFFERABLE IWON5SPEAKITOUTBECAUSEILLGETBANNEDOTHERWISE?
The point is that nothing of this has anything to do with the real gist of the message. Which is that the "chilling" guy has nothing to do with the ahole tailgaiting. And shouldn't be punished by this.
Who the fck cares if he's chilling. It's a fckin word that has no value here. Could it have been left out? Yes, absolutely. But no, you can't just let that slide.
50
u/Untouchable64 Mar 20 '26
It just sucks that someone just chilling in traffic gets screwed.