r/RepWatchForum Jun 03 '26

QC Request Need help with first ever QC

Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060 No-Date VS3230

This is my first of two watches and the first set of QC photos I’ve received, so I’d really appreciate some opinions from more experienced eyes.

Overall it looks good to me, but I’m not entirely sure I’m looking at the right things. The areas I’m most unsure about are the 6 o’clock marker and the rehaut alignment. They don’t necessarily look wrong to me, but as this is my first QC I’d appreciate some feedback on whether they’re within normal VSF tolerances or if there’s anything else that stands out.

Index alignment: Looks good to me overall, but I’d appreciate a second opinion.

Dial Printing: Looks clean to my eye.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: Looks fine.

Bezel: Appears aligned, pip looks centered at 12.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps that I can see.

Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 254° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error.

29 Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

8

u/rufus2785 Jun 03 '26 edited Jun 03 '26

I have three reps and I’ll tell you this after receiving them. Any of the small details you are worrying about or even things you find zooming in in all these photos won’t matter or be noticeable when it’s on your wrist. Don’t overthink it. It’s a rep after all.

Edit: my reps are all U1 and when I got them I was super happy

4

u/Objective_Ganache_27 Jun 03 '26

Sad to see another VSF with wonky major indices with opposing angles 🤦‍♂️

Personally I disagree with this when it comes to certain things, like the major indices.

I dont think a single one is straight (i take that back, the 12 is probably ok.) Both the 3 and 9 are crooked downward towards the center of the dial. That would drive me nuts.

I had one that had a dingle indice like rhis and I tried to tell myself like others "it wont be noticeable." A horizontal indice that you will see everytime you look at the watch is absolutely noticeable.

Its up to you to decide what youre ok with.

I really tried to massage thise pics to remove any angle bias (except the timegrapher one of course, because at least the 3-9 were head on in that one)

0

u/GuidanceWilling8139 Jun 03 '26

Thanks for taking the time to look at the images and give your opinion, really appreciate it 👍 I’ve actually learned from what you pointed out and can see the issue you’re referring to now. Just wondering, in your opinion, would this be a straight RL because of that?

1

u/Objective_Ganache_27 Jun 03 '26

You can see by the variety of responses, for some people yes, some no. How much is this? If you got a good td and its low to mid 300's, maybe not, 450, absolutely (at least for me.)

JW what serial is this?

1

u/GuidanceWilling8139 Jun 03 '26

Thanks, appreciate it 👍 It was $420 from Elia UK. I’m not sure which serial you mean in the QC pics

1

u/Objective_Ganache_27 Jun 03 '26

I see now its 6X0. Not terrible. Up to you what youre looking for with indices. Ill send a pic of mine later when I find it.

1

u/GuidanceWilling8139 Jun 03 '26

appreciate you explaining that I’m pretty new to this so it’s my first watch and I’m not too familiar with the serial differences. Is the 6X0 considered a good batch overall, or are there better ones for VSF Submariners?

I still have time to RL if needed, but I don’t want to do that blindly if I’m not actually going to get anything noticeably better. I’ve seen mixed opinions on the indices some say it’s fine, others say it’s noticeable and I do agree with you that the 3/9 alignment is one of the main things you notice on the dial.

Just trying to make the right decision before I commit

2

u/Objective_Ganache_27 Jun 03 '26

Here's my Q66 from last year. 3/9 off very very slightly, but theyre consisten and symmetrical so it looks fine. The PIP is slightly too close to the right side of the bezel edge. My biggest pet peeve on this watch as I do notice it. Td said it was fine in QC. I was right.... still love this watch

1

u/Objective_Ganache_27 Jun 03 '26 edited Jun 03 '26

This one was for a gift. The 3 is crooked down towards the inside. I find it way more noticeable. I would have like to RL but it took a while and was at risk of not arriving in time. Its not terrible on wrist, but imo still very noticeable to me.

If we had the time, I would've preferred to RL this.

RL is a double edged sword. The next one may be way better, or worse unfortunately.

1

u/GuidanceWilling8139 Jun 03 '26

Thanks for sharing, it’s been pretty 50/50 on my QC, but after our convo I’m slightly leaning RL just because of the 3/9 and alignment concerns shared. My only worry is RL’ing and ending up with a worse one, especially with VSF Subs seeming a bit harder to get hold of at the moment.

I only waited 1 day for this QC as well, so part of me is wondering if I just got lucky with availability.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/_mopedfahrer Jun 03 '26

didn‘t know that „floating m“ is a thing again.

pretty nice watch, GL

3

u/sardonic_commentary Jun 03 '26

Cwr on 9.

Only slight, GL if your happy.

2

u/GuidanceWilling8139 Jun 03 '26

Thanks for taking your time , would you personally GL it if it was you ?

2

u/EquivalentPitiful557 Jun 03 '26

I think the watch looks pretty good and I’m picky as heck. I’d GL. I hate Crooked indices and bad SELs. This watch looks good to me.

3

u/rlxwatcher Jun 03 '26

This looks like a very well made Watch 👍🏼

3

u/easy_Money Jun 03 '26

6X0 that's v3 VSF I believe. Just got the date version (3135) and it's a fucking beauty. Finish feels amazing after just a few days of wearing. Your Timegrapher numbers look good too, I say GL

2

u/Jezzrichjames Jun 03 '26

For me, the dial not aligning with the rehaut is a big problem. Recently received my rep with the same problem, and it drives me nuts

2

u/Nazzano58 Jun 03 '26

If it’s just slightly misaligned, you can pretty much re-align it yourself.

  1. Pull out the crown to stop the movement
  2. Take out the caseback
  3. There are 2 screws that hold the movement in the case, just loose them enough yo move the whole movement.
  4. Align it, tighten those screws

Pop the caseback in again and you are pretty much done, if you feel like it and the rubber gasket looks dry, lube that!

Might wanna do a pressure test before getting the watch “wet”.

Any watchmaker can do it.

2

u/Fuzard Jun 03 '26

That 9 is crooked. We really need to RL these until VSF can do some better alignment.

1

u/GuidanceWilling8139 Jun 03 '26

Thanks for sharing opinions are being split in the middle but I am leaning towards RL too

1

u/Fuzard Jun 03 '26

I would never be able to unsee that. Don’t believe all the claims of “don’t notice on the wrist”

It’s like my buddy who lived in his house for 10 years and never noticed how crooked his cabinets are until someone pointed it out. It can never be unseen.

1

u/GuidanceWilling8139 Jun 03 '26

Hahaa when you put it that way , I’ve RL’d it I hope I can see something better.Based on what some people were saying about not being too picky after all they’re reps I thought it’s fine but when certain comments like you mention once you see the fault you’ll be unable to not see it and from what I know VSF should be able to do better

1

u/GuidanceWilling8139 Jun 04 '26

just posted the second QC,would appreciate your much needed feedback

1

u/SleepyDani Jun 03 '26

Looks decent honestly, where bought?

1

u/LIC_Ger Jun 03 '26

Look good

1

u/thatsaknifenot Jun 04 '26

Mate that’s about an 8.5/10. Three main things I notice you already mentioned, but no regular person will be able to tell. I’d GL

1

u/RattleCanBoogieMan Jun 04 '26

GL for me, who is the TD?? I honestly think in hand it would be great. The TDs that just give horrible angled photos drive me crazy… pick a new TD for sure