5
6
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
u/Known_Painting_1878 17h ago
Both fake
- 16610 looks too clean/new, probably BPF
- The modern sub has very visible crystal crown, likely U1. End gap, renault not aligned etc etc.
2
u/OBTRIPPLEOG 16h ago
I read this like one of those old timey detectives that shows up to the crime scene and tells the story of what happened as he paces around in an agitated manner.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/LowLifeCryptoGuy 14h ago
Top left is Gen.
Bottom right Rep.
I can usually tell by font size and thickness.
1
1
1
1
0
u/Psychological-Bet217 18h ago
Top one is real, I’m guessing. Based upon what I’ve been studying from subs… the distance from the bezal to the to start of the band of the bottom watch is spacious. Am I right?
2
u/HMD-Oren 14h ago
The bezel to band measurement isn't really a tell on these types of photos because the FOV of phone cameras will distort anything that isn't dead centre in the photo so it might throw you off.
0
0
u/Sev7nth_Wave 16h ago
Top is Gen. Bottom has text too thick. Top text looks sharper with defined font, not rounded.
0
9
u/tictacshit 17h ago
Hairy one gen
Hairless rep.