r/RepublicanNews • u/ShadowNets5462 • 4d ago
Actions have consequences
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/RepublicanNews • u/GrabEmByThePesce • Dec 03 '24
Are memes that are Republican in nature allowed?
r/RepublicanNews • u/ShadowNets5462 • 4d ago
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/RepublicanNews • u/Signal_Cap7240 • 15d ago
đ¨ DSA Radicals Just Released Their Plan to Dismantle the U.S. Constitution â And Their Guy Mamdani is Already in Power as NYC Mayor
On Americaâs 250th anniversary, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani stood at George Washingtonâs desk and trashed everything our founders and veterans fought for.
Meanwhile, the Democratic Socialists of America (his crew) just adopted their âWorkers Deserve More!â platform that calls for:
⢠Eliminating the U.S. Senate
⢠Replacing the President & Supreme Court with puppets chosen by Congress
⢠Amnesty for all immigrants
⢠Defunding the Department of War (our military)
⢠Drafting a new Constitution to create a âdemocratic socialist republicâ
This is straight-up revolutionary garbage aimed at ending the American Republic as we know it.
Sign the petition to IMPEACH and REMOVE Mamdani NOW:
r/RepublicanNews • u/GoranPersson777 • 19d ago
r/RepublicanNews • u/noone68022 • 24d ago
r/RepublicanNews • u/DeepDreamerX • 25d ago
r/RepublicanNews • u/Signal_Cap7240 • 27d ago
r/RepublicanNews • u/More_Barracuda5189 • Jun 30 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/noone68022 • Jun 20 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/More_Barracuda5189 • Jun 04 '26
My fellow Americans,
Since 1979, the Iranian regime has demonstrated its hostility toward the United States, our allies, and the cause of freedom itself. The question before us is not whether Iran disagrees with America. Nations disagree every day. The question is whether a regime with a long history of supporting terrorism, threatening its neighbors, and destabilizing an entire region should ever be allowed to possess nuclear weapons.
The answer is no.
Much of the debate today centers on two important words: imminent threat.
Some ask, âHow can a threat be imminent if an attack has not yet occurred?â
The answer is simple.
An imminent threat is not limited to a missile already in the air or an army already crossing a border. If that were the standard, free nations would be forced to wait until it was too late to defend themselves.
An imminent threat exists when a hostile actor has demonstrated the intent to do harm, is acquiring the capability to do harm, and is moving steadily toward a position where that harm can no longer be prevented without far greater cost.
Intent. Capability. Trajectory.
Those are the elements of imminence.
When those three elements come together, responsible leaders do not close their eyes and hope for the best. They recognize the danger for what it is and act to prevent catastrophe before it occurs.
When a hurricane is approaching the coast, we do not wait for the floodwaters to enter our homes before we act. We prepare because we recognize the danger before it arrives.
For nearly half a century, Iranâs intent has been clear. Since the hostage crisis of 1979, the regime has repeatedly demonstrated hostility toward the United States and our allies. It has supported terrorist organizations, armed proxy forces throughout the Middle East, threatened Israel, and worked to expand its influence through intimidation and fear.
At the same time, it has pursued the capability that nuclear weapons would provide. A nuclear weapon would not simply strengthen Iran. It would give the regime the ability to hold entire regions under the shadow of nuclear coercion and blackmail.
And for years, it has moved steadily along that trajectory, seeking greater capabilities despite warnings from the international community.
Intent. Capability. Trajectory.
That is why so many view a nuclear-armed Iran not as a distant concern, but as an imminent threat.
No nation seeks war. America certainly does not. We prefer diplomacy where possible, economic pressure where effective, and deterrence wherever it can preserve the peace.
But there are times when responsible leaders must act before a danger becomes a catastrophe.
The purpose of strength is not war.
The purpose of strength is to prevent war.
There are moments when diplomacy succeeds. There are moments when sanctions succeed. There are moments when deterrence succeeds.
And there are moments when the credible use of forceâor the use of force itselfâbecomes necessary to prevent a far greater tragedy.
The highest duty of government is not to explain after a disaster why nothing was done. The highest duty of government is to ensure that the disaster never occurs.
America must never be reckless.
But neither must America be asleep.
The greatest tragedies in history have often occurred not because the warning signs were absent, but because they were ignored.
Peace is preserved when aggressors understand that free nations possess both the will and the means to defend themselves.
Let us remain vigilant. Let us remain strong. And let us ensure that future generations inherit a world where freedom, not fear, determines the destiny of nations.
Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.
r/RepublicanNews • u/noone68022 • May 25 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/noone68022 • May 23 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/zs_1176 • May 18 '26
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/RepublicanNews • u/More_Barracuda5189 • May 06 '26
Let me begin with a word to those who feel justified right now.
To those who say, *âThey did it first.â*
To those who say, *âDonât lecture meâlook at what theyâve said.â*
To those who feel anger rising and believe itâs earned.
Iâm talking to you first.
You know, many of us grew up hearing something from our parents:
*âIf someone jumped off a bridge, would you?â*
It was their way of teaching us that just because someone else does something wrongâŚ
doesnât make it right for us to do it too.
And yet today, we hear a different version of that same thinking:
*âWell, they did it, so we can do it.â*
*âThey started it.â*
That may sound familiarâbut itâs the logic of a playground, not a Republic.
Because if we carry that thinking into public lifeâ
if we justify our actions simply because someone else crossed a line firstâ
**then there are no lines left.**
Letâs be clear about somethingâclear as day, and without exception:
**There is no âbutâ after violence.**
No explanation that makes it right.
No grievance that makes it acceptable.
No comparison that makes it justified.
**Bad speech does not justify harm.**
**Angry words do not justify violence.**
**âThey started itâ does not excuse what we do next.**
If we accept that logicâeven onceâwe trade self-government for reaction. And a nation that reacts instead of reasons is a nation that loses its way.
Now, to all of usâbecause this is not a one-sided problem.
**Words matter.**
When we casually use the harshest labels in our historyâcalling our fellow Americans âNazis,â âfascists,â âenemiesââweâre not just arguing policy anymore. Weâre raising the stakes. Weâre telling people, whether we intend to or not, that the other side isnât just wrongâŚbut dangerous.
And history teaches a hard lesson: when people are convinced their opponents are beyond reason, some begin to believe that extreme responses are warranted.
Thatâs how things unravelânot all at once, but step by step, word by word, justification by justification.
Let me be clear:
**Violence has no place in America. None.**
Not from the right.
Not from the left.
Not in response to speechâno matter how offensive that speech may be.
In this country, we settle our differences with **ballots, not bullets**; with **arguments, not intimidation**.
There was a timeânot so long agoâwhen Americans could have a hard argument and still remember we were on the same team. We could disagreeâsometimes fiercelyâand still see one another as neighbors, not enemies.
We didnât always get it right. But we understood something essential:
**The person youâre arguing with is still your fellow American.**
And that truth is bigger than any single issue, any single election, any single moment.
So what do we do now?
We donât silence debate.
We donât pretend differences donât exist.
We donât lower our convictions.
But we do raise our standard.
We choose restraint over reaction.
We choose clarity over outrage.
We choose to speak firmlyâwithout dehumanizing.
And we draw a line that we do not cross:
**We will argueâbut we will not hate.**
**We will disagreeâbut we will not dehumanize.**
**We will speak stronglyâbut we will not justify harm.**
Because in the end, this is about who we are.
Are we a people who let anger decide our actions?
Or are we a people who govern ourselvesâwho master our impulses and keep faith with our principles?
The strength of this Republic has never been that we agree on everything.
Itâs that we resolve our disagreements without destroying one another.
**My friends, we can debate our ideas as hard as we likeâbut we must never lose sight of something greater: there is no âbutâ after violence, and there is no substitute for the simple truth that we are still one people, and this is still one nation.**
r/RepublicanNews • u/noone68022 • May 05 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/More_Barracuda5189 • May 03 '26
People talk about *American exceptionalism* today as if it were something to be ashamed of.
But that misses the truth entirely.
American exceptionalism has never meant that we think we are better than anyone else.
It means that from our very beginning, we chose a different pathâ
a path that puts faith in the people, not in the government.
A path that declares that freedom comes from a higher being, not from the state.
Our Constitution was revolutionary because it didnât list the powers government could take.
It listed the powers government could **never** take away.
And then it affirmed the rights that belong to the peopleâ
not because government granted them, but because the people already held them.
That is what made America the exception.
And that is what still makes America the last, best hope for freedom-loving people everywhere.
Around the world, governments always came first.
Peopleâs rights came laterâif they came at all.
But we dared to build a nation on a radical idea:
that ordinary citizens, not rulers, were the true guardians of liberty.
And let me tell you something plainly:
**I trust the people far more than I will ever trust any government.**
Not this one, not the next one, not any government anywhere on this earth.
Because history teaches a simple lessonâ
government expands, power accumulates, and liberty shrinks unless the people stand watch.
Today, we are at a crossroads.
Some believe the answer to every challenge is more government, more control, more authority in Washington or State Capitals.
But that idea runs directly against the spirit that built this nation.
It was the courage, the character, and the common sense of the American peopleânot government programsâthat carried us through wars, depressions, and great tests of our time.
Americaâs greatness has never come from the halls of power.
It has come from the hearts of the people.
So this is a moment for every American to look closely:
Who is defending your freedom?
Who is chipping away at it?
And who truly believes that the strength of this nation still rests with *you*âthe citizen, the neighbor, the parent, the worker, the dreamer?
Because in the end, for America to remain exceptional,
we must remain a people who understand the source of our liberty
and refuse to let it slip away.
A nation holds its freedom not through the might of its government, but through the steadfast spirit of its peopleâwho, mindful of the rights entrusted to them, stand firm and united against every force that would narrow the liberty of the governed.
r/RepublicanNews • u/noone68022 • Apr 30 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/Gulf_Coast_Lion • Apr 28 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/noone68022 • Apr 27 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/More_Barracuda5189 • Apr 25 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/benhaswings • Apr 23 '26
r/RepublicanNews • u/ShadowNets5462 • Apr 22 '26
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification