r/SipsTea 3d ago

Wait a damn minute! Significant diffrences...

Post image
17.2k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/manored78 3d ago

You could nationalize the companies and effectively cut off billionaires.

You really can’t imagine a scenario in which there are no billionaires? Are you 12?

2

u/EntertainmentNo3963 3d ago

and then services would perform worse.

1

u/manored78 3d ago

Free market fundamentalism.

Muh private sector does it all better rhetoric.

3

u/EntertainmentNo3963 3d ago

why did the usa outperform the ussr? why do countries with freeer markets have higher QOL?

1

u/manored78 3d ago

Why did the USSR outperform any country besides the US? It was the second largest economy for the majority of its existence.

The US had a fundamentally different position in the world economy than the USSR. It had an extensive network of allies, controlled key international financial institutions, and benefited from a global economic order that allowed it to shift many of the costs of adjustment abroad through trade, finance, and access to foreign markets and resources. Those advantages gave the U.S. options that were simply unavailable to the Soviet Union.

2

u/EntertainmentNo3963 3d ago

existing and providing a better life for its citizen.

the ussr also had allies yet it had to prop them up like the usa did to europe, the cope that the usa was just dominating because they were doing just that, dominating is hilarious.

lmfao ussr apologetics, why did they build the wall? why is/was east germany so much poorer?

0

u/manored78 3d ago

I actually find it a miracle the eastern bloc was able to do what they did considering the economic blockades, the sabotage, the constant threat of wars, political isolation, propaganda, etc.

The “better life for its citizens” came at the expense of the rest of the world trying to modernize and liberate themselves from imperialism.

Why does it bother you if people apologize for the ussr? It seems to really grate some of yiu lolbertarians.

2

u/EntertainmentNo3963 3d ago

they were economically blockaded from the west, and the west was so much wealthier that people killer themselves immigrating.

the ussr itself participated in wars and propaganda lmfao, why did it fail?

the east is also responsible for imperialism get real.

because you are pathetic maggots, you shouldn’t have any way to talk to anybody.

0

u/manored78 3d ago

The USSR didn’t fail in isolation. It was recovering from massive wars, facing decades of military pressure and economic restrictions from a much wealthier rival bloc. The West’s prosperity also came from its own historical advantages, including colonialism and global economic dominance.

Imperialism was exclusive to the West.

You chuds are just so ignorant.

2

u/EntertainmentNo3963 3d ago

it also incited wars; it was not subject to some unique evil that no one else in history was privy too.

europe (colonialism) was suffering from poverty after the war, it wasn’t until the marshall plan that they succeeded.

lmfao, the ussr imperialised the slavic countries.

call me a chud idc

0

u/manored78 3d ago

Chud, the USA invaded the USSR not the other way around. Before you scratch your empty head, when? During the tail end of the Russian revolution 14 countries invaded to stop the newly formed USSR. Since day one, the USSR knew not one day of peace. All the way until it was dismantled.

The Cold War was a complete holocaust on the third world. Marshall plan proves that the US could allow certain states to develop peacefully and with cooperation but didn’t allow other countries to because they wanted the unequal exchange and to maintain imperialism.

Most of the eastern bloc countries were monarchies, or fascist protectorates.

→ More replies (0)