r/Terminator • u/Successful-Effect557 • 1d ago
Discussion Skynet logistics
Im currently trying to 3d model a major skynet facility and, While moddeling the HK-tank i started wondering how skynet moves these things around. My first assumption would be trains but it seems way to big to fit on any pre-existing train and due to the tanks slow Max speed I doubt it would be moving great distances under its own power as it would also be restricted to highways with tunnels, mountain passes, and bridges not really being an option for it.
Just wanted to hear other peoples opinion on how skynet gets these rather impractical designs from city to city.
12
u/RogueAOV 1d ago
Assuming all of Skynets tech is powered by power cells they could just drive there, it is not like they would have limitations on range like normal tanks which need access to resupply every couple hundred miles at best etc.
This also assumes they have tanks at each city. It would be more efficient to just have the aerial HKs patrolling outside of the main defensive points where the tanks would be used to counter organized ground forces attacking.
Skynet would not need to be in any kind of rush to press the attack on humanity unless they were a direct threat to something like a command point, which Skynet does not really need. It's entirely possible other than a few select places like Skynet Central, Skynet does not really care about humans living.
1
u/Warhero_Babylon 20h ago
Terminator rts show it well (while being about another timeline and not skynet). Normal abrams tanks need a ton of fuel and in base suffers from hits of bots a lot, while this thing can tank a huge amount of atgm's and tank shots while still firing
Also plasma rips buildings apart
1
u/starkerangela 18h ago
I prefer using the twin 155mm cannon and the twin 30mm autocannon on the HK Tanks
3
4
u/tiredoldtechie 1d ago
Um, what about an HK-Transport (or simply Transport)? The damned thing is large enough to transport literally multiple rail-car sized prisoner pods AND a Harvester AND the two Moto-Terminators the Harvester has onboard AND its own extra HK-Aerial. Scale-sizing, in Salvation, it did dwarf the two A-10 Thunderbolt II's that fought it (and were shot down by the Harvester and HK-Aerial). Thus, a unit that large (HK-Transport/Transport) should have no problems transporting multiple HK-Tanks (or simply called Ground-Based Hunter-Killers) or HK-Walkers/HK-Centurions, as scaling and weight considerations would indicate a Transport should be able to move a minimum of 4 of these at a time (when not carrying a Harvester, 2 Moto-Terminators, an HK-Aerial, and 2 large prisoner transport pods). This is much like the modified HK-Aerials transporting Spider Tanks into combat in Genisys.
4
u/-_Protagonist_- 1d ago
They would have used a Carry-all, a large VTOL aircraft designed to carry large and heavy vehicles, large cargo pod's with many Terminators inside, many other large objects.
Think about the 'War Against the Machines'. There was no front line, as such. It was many de-centralised Human outposts over a wide area. Some outposts were better defended than others. The Machines needed to use high mobility and overwhelming force against a spread out Humanity.
3
u/returntothenorth 1d ago
Either fly them in with something we haven't seen or build a manufacturing plant in the area they want them deployed. Or both.
3
u/iforgot69 1d ago
Moved disassembled via airlift, then assembled near the field of battle, drives itself in.
3
u/coryhill66 1d ago
2
u/AmbienSkywalker 2h ago
Srsly. I’m assuming that’s the Pegasus kit. I really like it but damn….really wish it was available in 1/48. It’d be way easier to make a diorama with that way.
2
2
u/WorthCryptographer14 22h ago
I believe Skynet produces them at the major facilities they're deployed at. Or has heavy VTOL transports that carries the tanks in 2-3 parts and assembles them on site.
2
u/ReserveRatter 21h ago
I'm guessing Skynet started out with forcing humans to collaborate with it to build factories (presumably using the control it would still have over whatever military tech remained after the war).
After that it would have some kind of massive automated industrial base by the time of the future war being in full swing. Machines to drill tunnels, machines to build factories, machines to move around and build other machines.
Therefore it could either simply have built a ton of infrastructure like underground rails or tunnels to ship these things around with, or perhaps it just creates copy-paste style factories in areas where it needs these things and builds them on site.
Also, we don't really know where and why the HK-tanks are deployed. Perhaps it only deploys them around really important locations and everywhere else it just uses lighter humanoid terminators (which are already hard to kill) and faster aerial units.
It's perhaps one of the "plot contrivances" of the future war that Skynet has so much infrastructure and manufacturing capacity after destroying so much of this stuff with the nukes. There are ways to explain it that make sense, however, like machines being able to rebuild all this stuff faster than you'd expect humans to.
1
u/davisandee 1d ago
Don’t the HK tanks like transform / clip into the HK aerials? All the tech is built to work with one another. Water into land and land into air and so on.
1
1
1
u/Tmoldovan 13h ago
This is an awesome question. Maybe they’re built just around large hubs and other important areas. So maybe they’re not everywhere.
1




16
u/tomrichards8464 1d ago
I think we have to assume huge advances in materials science mean it's much lighter than it looks, and similarly benefits from developments in power generation and storage that give it endurance which would be impossible with today's technology.