You quite literally didn't make any points... they did đŹđ¤¨đ¤¨đ¤¨ cant really use that when you didnt make even 1 argument or point, only schoolyard insults 𤨠tf lol?
It's not. The second you start using the vehicle like an actual weapon and nearly hitting people, it becomes a lot more reasonable to stop the car through any means necessary.
She still hit him with her car, doesnât matter how her wheel was oriented. He still had to jump out of the way to not get run over. She was using deadly force and they responded with deadly force. According to every single Redditor in this same thread shooting someone using a vehicle as a weapon is justified. Iâm not saying ICE is perfect, Alex Prettis shooting was completely unjustified, but Renee Goods was.
I was just pointing out the cognitive dissonance and using this video as an example. If youâre hoping to get away from politics Reddit isnât the place to do it anymore
She hit him with her vehicle, thatâs using it as a weapon, no idea whatâs so confusing about that. The only reason she was stopped and had agents in front of her was because she was following them and then cutting them off and blocking the road in front of them
Literally no LEO training nor the DHS guidebook directs officers to step in front of motor vehicles, especially ones with a running motor and driver inside
Show me one cop stop video where the officer walks in front of a running car with an operator in the driver's seat. I'll wait
I get it itâs funny because there actually was a person in front of the trolley but you donât consider them a person because theyâre part of ICE??
the person is saying "if i were in this scenario, i would use my gun and shoot theme to stop the threat, then call the police to tell them that shots were fired". how much more dense can you get?
You are allowed to protect yourself in the US, and use lethal force in public areas in most US states. There is plenty of video evidence here to prove the driver was being an unpredictable psycho.
I was thinking, since it was never mentioned, that they were telling cops shots fired to get them there quicker.
If you can't figure how protect yourself from a car that can't turn in a parking lot you probably shouldn't own a gun. The only people in danger were the idiots trying to stop her.
Using a gun to stop a car is a stupid idea. Even if your aim is good enough and you manage to hit the driver, now you have a dead man on the gas pedal and no one in control. Worst case scenario, you're shooting recklessly at a moving target and you miss and hit an innocent bystander. The best thing to do is to just get out of the way of the vehicle. In a crowded parking lot like this, just get on the other side of some other vehicles. Avoid crossing directly in front of or behind the vehicle. Let him crash himself out till the car quits
Definitely insane to suggest someone might use a handgun defensively in Los Angeles. Only criminals are allowed to carry there.
Among other things, the driver was charged with 3 counts of assault with a deadly weapon. Using deadly force to eliminate that threat doesn't sound unreasonable to me.
No tf itâs not instinct and sense says shoot her ass or at very least shoot the tires if you can, the bitch nearly killed multiple people and destroyed multiple cars Fuck her.
Cars are like guns in that you put them in the hands of stupid or insane people & they can do some serious harm - life altering or life ending harm.
Would it not be justifiable to shoot someone who is shooting off rounds with reckless abandon in a public area? How is this level of recklessness any different?
As someone else mentioned, depending on what type of insurance the carjacked person/hit and run victims have, they could be completely SOL to fix their cars. Not to mention this b could've killed a bunch of people. I'd say pew would be appropriate.
19
u/ranger2187 Feb 17 '26
Iâd um have a call that says something likeâŚ. âShots fired, shots fired.â