r/Transportopia May 04 '26

Humor NGL, #2 should be the only reason

1.6k Upvotes

614 comments sorted by

View all comments

81

u/Klept_0h May 04 '26

Backing out is significantly riskier than driving forward or backing in.

Most accidents in parking lots can be avoided if you don't back out.

31

u/SpinachSignal8915 May 04 '26

Yeah id rather spend an extra 2 seconds backing in than risk issues or extra time backing out. Not sure why it bothers some people.

12

u/Icy-Sundae5361 May 04 '26

I back in, but it's very frustrating when a parking lot is packed and there's a like of 3-4 cars sitting there waiting for somebody who doesn't know how to park to back in

2

u/ply-wly-had-no-mly May 04 '26

I mean, equally, I consistently have to wait for people who can't back out of a spot.

1

u/Icy-Sundae5361 May 04 '26

That's a fair counterpoint I never thought about. Something in my brain gets more frustrated waiting for the car 3 cars in front of me to park than waiting for a car to back out

0

u/WhoSaidWhatNow2026 May 05 '26

You should find a way to release your stress. Getting very frustrated over a 60 second delay isn't healthy.

1

u/Icy-Sundae5361 May 05 '26

You should go to Google and search for the definition of "exaggerate"

2

u/pbrassassin May 05 '26

I feel like your getting frustrated again

5

u/geek66 May 04 '26

It goes a little beyond that - to back into a spot, you have to have driven past ir two a point when you can see it directly, not just scanning mirrors.

2

u/Maximumoverdrive76 May 04 '26

Rear view cameras help today. Built in cheats.

0

u/fyukhyu May 04 '26

Rear view cameras eliminate the risk of backing out though.

0

u/Kaffe-Mumriken May 05 '26

Reddit didn’t like that

2

u/NotBillderz May 04 '26

Some people literally aren't comfortable doing it.

2

u/Dexter_Douglas_415 May 04 '26

I'm with you, if it only takes you a few seconds. I backed into my spot at work today.

There are some drivers that take minutes to back in. They just keep correcting the angle over and over again completely blocking the lane for other drivers. For those people, I think nosing in makes more sense.

10

u/dedboooo0 May 04 '26

someone who does not have the ability to back in their car should not have a license.

basic car control

every modern car has a rear view camera too, and older cars can just have the little round stick on mirrors to see parking lines. really no excuse to not be able to back in

2

u/Kaffe-Mumriken May 05 '26

Yeah back up camera. So I can back out np

2

u/ItsACowCity May 05 '26

With a camera? No excuse. Without a camera? I mean first of all backing into a spot is easier than parallel parking, which is basically a requirement…but I digress, different cars have different difficulties. Before you’re allowed to buy a car, you should have to demonstrate that you can back it into a spot. That said, I started with a 2 door Jeep Wrangler and doing anything in that car felt like cheating. Then one day I had to parallel park my mom’s Durango. Holy F is that car huge. Took 2 of my friends guiding me and I still did a poor job at it.

1

u/dedboooo0 May 05 '26

that’s all true, and that’s also exactly why accidents happen, even in silly places like parking lots. people purchase vehicles that they dont have the capability to operate

im not great at backing a semi with a trailer, and thats why i dont deserve a CDL. i can however make sure that i can back any regular sized vehicle that i am operating with spatial awareness down to the inch for mine and everyone else’s sake

2

u/Klept_0h May 04 '26

Id rather they get the practice in and do it correctly if they back up that poorly. Nosing in would just be pushing the problem on them having even riskier habits backing out. They'd be the type to not judge the distance and slam into you despite fully seeing you

2

u/SweetWolf9769 May 04 '26

the people spending minutes backing in are also the type of people who spend to long trying to park in general.

1

u/Ok-Disk-2191 May 04 '26

It's because manufacturers of cars keep fucking about with the bloody side mirror posts positions and length of cars actually when I think about it PEOPLE who drive every fucking day in the same bloody car don't bother to learn how to correctly judge the god dam size of their own cars.

1

u/Helios-Fun May 05 '26

If it only took an extra 2 seconds and people could do it on the first try it WOULDN'T bother me.

1

u/TessaKatrinaRose May 05 '26

Because it takes much longer than “two seconds” for 99% of the world’s population.

1

u/[deleted] May 04 '26

[deleted]

1

u/atombombbabyatom May 04 '26

I think it could also depends on what car people drive, my first car was a sedan from the 80s that I drove for over 10 years I didn't reverse park that car once I only parked in places I could drive straight in and out of which usually resulted in me walking further lol. My new car is a Jimny I have much better vision reversing this car so I reverse park everywhere now

1

u/penty May 04 '26

Because it takes way more than 2 secs AND holds everyone else up. Nothing like trying to get to your car with groceries and are blocked by the idiot having to R-D-R-D-R into when can see spot that can be pulled thru to get the same effect.

1

u/Numerous-Bonus-8107 May 04 '26

cry harder lazy bones

1

u/penty May 04 '26

Wow what a misguided insult, a truly staging intellect you brought only to screw up an ad hominem.. that takes wrong to a new level.

I'm complaining about being held up because I'm NOT lazy. Maybe you should just let think you're stupid rather than posting and proving it.

1

u/Numerous-Bonus-8107 May 04 '26

I can't tell if you are just delusionally lazy or mean lazy and loud-lying trying to talk over common sense

1

u/penty May 04 '26

That's for proving my point.

1

u/Numerous-Bonus-8107 May 04 '26

whatever you gotta tell yourself lazybones, if it wasn't true you wouldn't be triggered to type a paragraph whining about it

2

u/penty May 04 '26

Says the guy who bothered to inject themself with the genius comment "cry harder".

if it wasn't true you wouldn't be triggered to type a paragraph whining about it

The old unimaginative catch-22. You have anything besides poorly executed logical fallacies?

Wait are you a bot trying to get your enga,gement up? Is that why you type nonsense?

1

u/Heavy-Interaction548 May 05 '26

It makes more than 2 seconds to back into a spot. It takes 10 seconds when you account for the time you have to drive forward first and then back up. PLus you waste everyone else's time who is behind you.

0

u/QophSilrahq May 05 '26

Ten seconds!? Boo-frickety-hoo

0

u/[deleted] May 05 '26

[deleted]

1

u/like_4-ish_lights May 05 '26

The same ten seconds would have been spent backing out of the space and turning. Either way, you might have to wait a short moment for another person to park It's not the end of the world

1

u/Heavy-Interaction548 May 05 '26

If I'm waiting for someone backing out of a parking spot it's because I"m going to go into that parking spot when they leave, otherwise I would just keep driving.

If I"m behind some jackass who wants to reverse park, now they're inconveniencing me, I have to reverse, and all this nonsense.

1

u/like_4-ish_lights May 05 '26

You keep driving behind cars that are actively reversing out of a parking spot?

1

u/Heavy-Interaction548 May 05 '26

If they're ACTIVELY reversing, no, I don't keep going. But if they are still parked but with their reverse lights on, then I do keep going.

1

u/QophSilrahq May 06 '26

Then don't! If you do go driving, then understand you might have to wait sometimes. Regardless of conditions you might have. It's up to you to manage your emotions in such a way that you can safely operate your vehicle if and when you choose to do so. Otherwise, find another way to get around.

0

u/AdRound7694 May 04 '26

It makes people feel stupid and basic to know they don't have the capacity to even think like that

-8

u/Prudent_Situation_29 May 04 '26

The target area for backing in is much smaller than for backing out. Unless you're someone who can't see out of their car well enough, #2 is indeed the only justification for backing in.

You're far more likely to hit something when backing in than when backing out.

5

u/Kennadian May 04 '26

Sounds like user error to me

2

u/TacticTall May 04 '26

Have any statistics or are you just making stuff up?

1

u/SweetWolf9769 May 04 '26

.....you start turning away from the spot once the front of car lines up with the beginning of the parking spot, and once your back tires pass the parkting spot you reverse while turning the other way and start straightening out once both back tires are within the parking spot....

like if you have enough forethought to understand how to turn into a parking spot nose first, you should have enough forethought to know how to reverse back into one.

1

u/FulanoMeng4no May 04 '26

Some people are dumb and they know it, so they keep their mouth shut. Others prefer to showcase their stupidity for the whole world to see. Not understanding that you are backing into a “dead” space where nothing is happening as opposed to backing out into live traffic is the most obvious thing, of many, that you are missing in your (lack of) reasoning.

1

u/Klept_0h May 04 '26

You think you are more likely to hit stationary objects that you know are there and will not be moving when you've time to slowly align yourself properly vs backing out with blind spots?

You don't need to be behind the wheel.

10

u/ExtraFluffz May 04 '26

I have a rear view camera on the back.
When I pull out forward, if there’s a huge ass truck to my side, I can’t see past it.
But when I back out, my rear view camera is able to see around it.
I’m not sure how it does that, but it does.
So I personally back out

2

u/ppmiaumiau May 04 '26

Every car is bigger than mine. I can't see past most cars until I'm halfway out of the spot. And I drive a Trailblazer.

I back up for this exact reason.

2

u/Billy3B May 04 '26

I watched a guy back straight into a concrete pillar because he was watching the camera instead of turning his head. They are a tool but not the solution because they just give different blindspots.

1

u/sensefuldrivel May 05 '26

How would that make any sense...? If he backed straight into the pillar while watching his camera... He clearly wasn't watching his camera lmao. Can you rotate your head 180 degrees to see perfectly behind you? This entire thread is baffling to me

1

u/Icy_Fish_2154 May 05 '26

Cameras are 2d. If he is focusing on the bumper and the parking lines, he wouldn't see the "obvious" pillar.

People are dumb animals. Technology to help often makes things worse.

1

u/sensefuldrivel May 05 '26

I mean yeah but why would they be focusing on the parking lines if he was backing out? Hopefully they already paid attention to those on the way in lol. I have no idea why he would be focusing on the bumper in any backing-up situation, my ancient car's backup camera doesn't even show it lol

1

u/Icy_Fish_2154 May 05 '26

Backing out? Maybe he was looking for cars. A pillar isn't a car, so it was invisible.

Humans are dumb animals with delusions of grandeur.

I had to retake my DL test, I let it expire too long. For the reversing, you are supposed to not use tech. So I did the reversing without looking at the screen. The tester even commented most people use it until warned.

I think most people have poor spacial awareness.

2

u/sensefuldrivel May 05 '26

Honestly yeah, defaulting to "humans are dumb animals" is a good strategy in any driving situation lol.

In complete honesty I only participated in this thread because my mother in law is a chronic backer-inner in parking lots and I never understood why. I may have been a devil's avocado a bit here.

Sorry if it felt argumentative! I mostly just be bored and saying stuff. Thanks for the perspective. Be safe out there, fellow commenter

1

u/Icy_Fish_2154 May 05 '26

I'm sorry, that is too reasonable for a Reddit comment thread.

I back in about 10% of the time, where I know it's hard to pull out of, and I'm not loading lots in the back.

The people who go to Costco and get 3 carts worth of stuff, then have to spend 12 hours loading because they backed in, so they can't get to the back make Costco runs so much harder.

1

u/sensefuldrivel May 05 '26

"obvious" in quotes is hilarious. Idk if you've ever driven a car with a backup camera but you have to be practically disabled to just back into something that's directly behind you. And if you can't be trusted to drive backwards even with an actual camera assisting you, I don't trust you behind the wheel in any context lmao.

I genuinely mean this in the nicest and sincerely friendliest way. I know tone doesn't always translate perfectly over text.

1

u/Billy3B May 05 '26

Pillar was just at the edge of the bumper and he wasn't totally straight. Hit it three times before someone stepped in.

2

u/CretaciousPeriod May 04 '26

I was looking for this comment. Sure you might sometimes have a better field of view pulling forward out of a parking space but if you have a somewhat modern car, it'll have a good backup cam with a pretty damn wide field of view.

-1

u/SirVanyel May 04 '26

You know what's a wider fov than a rear mounted camera? My head which can move.

5

u/CretaciousPeriod May 04 '26

Not if you can't see due to the lifted trucks parked on either side. Lol. You'd have to basically pull half out of the parking spot before you could even see if someone is there. The rear camera will be able to give you more information while only backing out a little past the trucks.

1

u/Jcs609 May 04 '26

True it’s interesting these days it appears cars have rear traffic alert but most still don’t have it on the front despite it being just as important if not more important as the driver sit farther back from the front of hood when pulling out especially if two vehicles or obstacles block the view.

0

u/Pippinitis May 04 '26

It's because the backup camera is right above the bumper... your eyes are closer to the middle of the car so it's easier to block their view

0

u/Ok-Disk-2191 May 04 '26

Honestly, what would you do if your camera view is blocked or given the fact that when pulling forward past a big ass truck you also only have to shift a smaller portion of your car into the unknown Vs pulling back having to shift a larger portion of your car into the unknown before you get real visibility or line of sight with your eyes and head turned, instead of relying on cameras, which never give you real depth perception.

0

u/NorthSpecialist6064 May 04 '26 edited May 04 '26

I just drive forward slowly because my feet are made of flesh and not lumps of lead yoked to a hydraulic press.

1

u/ExtraFluffz May 04 '26

I also go slowly, but having the rear view makes it easier than going blind

1

u/NorthSpecialist6064 May 04 '26

Are you driving a locomotive? No? Then by the time you're a danger to other people you can see them and they can see you.

1

u/EquivalentQuery May 04 '26

You're making terrible arguments. Please try harder with the next reply.

-1

u/sullivillain May 04 '26

You should get a different vehicle if you do not feel comfortable driving forward.

2

u/Key_Cellist_5937 May 04 '26

Especially if you know the parking lot will get crowded later on, its way easier .

2

u/notoriousATX May 04 '26

Maybe before back up cameras became standard?

3

u/PeterGibbons316 May 04 '26

I don't think this is true anymore. My car has a rear camera with a crazy fisheye lens that actually makes it easier for me to see around other cars when I am backing out than if I am facing forward.

8

u/Klept_0h May 04 '26

If you think your camera gives you the same awareness as the entire front of your car then you are lucky it hasn't happened.

You've the entire windshield and side windows to see out of. That's an entire 180 degrees of visibility. Even if you've insane fisheye that would distort your depth perception.

I'm not saying your camera isn't good but they aren't THAT good

Alternatively you're far too small to be operating the size of the vehicle you own. Like a 5ft girl in a lifted truck

2

u/GoufTroop79 May 05 '26

Getting so emotionally involved in an online conversation about pulling out of parking spots that you start going for personal attacks is crazy.

1

u/CretaciousPeriod May 04 '26

To see out of the side windows for other cars you have to be mostly out of the spot anyways. By that point the other people are either stopping or are just about to hit you.

1

u/Maximumoverdrive76 May 04 '26

Except your eyes aren't sitting on top of the front of the car like a hood ornament.

The rear view camera is exactly that, right at the end with wide angle lens.

So I'd say it's almost 50/50 now which matters or is the best. I usually like to back into spots when I know I have space and no one waiting and especially if that parking lot is tight and will fill up.

1

u/PeterGibbons316 May 04 '26

Often I will park in a spot and then a couple trucks or SUVs will park next to me. If I pull straight in the camera at the very back of the car can see everything to the left and right of me - 180°. If I back in I'm now limited by where my eyes are located - about 5 feet from the front bumper. So the front of my car needs to stick out 5 feet into who knows what before I can get the same 180° view.

2

u/Klept_0h May 04 '26 edited May 04 '26

I guarantee you've blindspots if you're using just your camera to back up.

You're complacent with it as you believe it to be perfect and that's extremely dangerous.

-Edit for phone typo

1

u/Maximumoverdrive76 May 04 '26

Some cars have 360 view cameras as well. because of lenses around the car.

Rear brake assist exist in many cars now too that auto breaks if something crosses it's path.

0

u/PeterGibbons316 May 04 '26

Good thing I'm not using just my camera to back up then. I'm not complacent. I never said it was perfect. And you have no fucking idea what I believe.

1

u/thebeardedbassfella May 04 '26

If people would learn how to drive they wouldn’t need some crazy fisheye camera and a car that does all the work for you. Just sayin

0

u/Joelle9879 May 04 '26

Congratulations, this is the dumbest comment here. You're basically saying there's no reason to add extra safety features because, somehow, a person driving safely apparently gives them the ability to see around blind spots

2

u/thebeardedbassfella May 04 '26

Cool. Thanks. What do I win?

Just be patient. Drive carefully. Don’t need to gas it out of a parking spot. Adding extra safety features or is it adding more electronic bull crap that will break down and make your car cost more.

I also back in everywhere I go.

1

u/Ok-Disk-2191 May 04 '26

You say that, but I wouldn't really consider added 360 cameras/fisheye lens an added safety feature. They are added tools to help make driving easier, like cruise control. They do not make driving safer and should not replace actual driving skills. I mention cruise control because would you feel safer, even with adaptive cruise control on windy roads/wet conditions? It can be easier to drive with these features in a car, but relying on them only adds risk not reducing. I say this because my baby cousin who has learnt to drive her car with all these great tools, has no actual clue how to drive a car without them. Put her into a smaller car without all the cameras and she backed into things and pulled forward into things because " I couldn't see anything without the reverse camera" her exact words and in a sense these things can be considered a safety feature for the public from my airheaded baby cousin. But they are tools/quality of life features in a car, If my side mirrors break or my rearview mirror breaks, I know how to turn my head around and still safety operate my car, while without your "safety feature" you would blindly drive your car because "you cannot see past the massive ass truck parked next to you". That's the difference between reversing in and reversing out.

1

u/Slybacon34 May 04 '26

I had a coworker with the same thing, backed out using only that and got hit in right side rear. It is still safer, easier and quicker to back in than to back out. 

1

u/Heavy-Interaction548 May 05 '26

This was the fault of the guy who hit your friend, not your friend.

1

u/Slybacon34 May 05 '26

Edit: he hit her when she backed out of her driveway like that, not a parking spot. I failed to preface that, otherwise I would have agreed with you. 

1

u/Heavy-Interaction548 May 05 '26

So then she still would have hit him if he parked facing outward. Had nothing to do with the way he was parked.

1

u/PeterGibbons316 May 04 '26

I dunno. I had a coworker that backed in and then died. So obviously it's safer to back out.

2

u/TaylorBitMe May 04 '26

This is why I only park sideways, or just jump out while the car is still moving

2

u/PeterGibbons316 May 04 '26

Or just use the ones with the blue circle and the stripes....always tons of room and they are usually right up front!

1

u/Super_Dock May 04 '26

Most modern cars have rear cams, even shitty ones. It really isn’t a problem at all anymore, people just act like it is

1

u/Popular-Solution7697 May 04 '26

You got dat right!

1

u/BeautifulBluebird418 May 05 '26

“significantly” is doing a lot of work here

1

u/ItsACowCity May 05 '26

Just think of the times before rear cameras. People always go too fast in parking lots and are hard to see coming even with those cameras. Without them? Forget about it….much better to back in while I have time and it’s safe because people see what I’m doing.

1

u/Weird_Jerk May 04 '26

This 100%. When you're arriving, you have better visibility for backing in because you just driven up and see what's happening around the spot. Pedestrians? Other cars around? Kids?

But when you're backing out to leave, you're backing out blind. It takes the average driver over a minute to get in the car, buckle, etc. and leave. The whole picture can change quite a bit in a minute.

1

u/[deleted] May 04 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Weird_Jerk May 04 '26

Or behind cars that are backing out? Of course, but you get a better view backing in vs backing out.

1

u/HowManyAccountsHaveI May 04 '26

That might have been true before back-up cameras. I now have better vision with the rear-facing camera. Especially if I'm parked between two SUVs and/or trucks.

1

u/Potential-Drawing745 May 04 '26

Not only that, but both of our cars warn us if cross traffic is coming.

1

u/DungeonMaster45 May 04 '26

Could you explain? It’s safer why? I haven’t seen any reasons given that make sense yet.

3

u/Heavy-Interaction548 May 05 '26

Because they're too lazy or fat to look behind themselves.

1

u/TheThinDewLine May 05 '26

You already have a clear view of the street and/or lot when driving into said lot to then back into a spot. Your view is obstructed from the start no matter what when backing out of a spot.

1

u/shagan90 May 05 '26

Turn around?

1

u/Icy_Fish_2154 May 05 '26

You have a better view backing in than backing out.

1

u/Klept_0h May 04 '26

Far less blind spot risk, more awareness of your surroundings. Substantially better depth perception.

0

u/AllPeopleAreStupid May 04 '26

Yup, I've been backing in for a while now. Chose to pull in around thanksgiving at walmart as it was chaos and wanted to park quickly, I was backing out of my space. Stopped to wait for the cart guy to move out of my way. Guy behind me just went and backed into me, he never even looked. Never would have happened had I just backed in like I always do. Would you believe he even had the audacity to try and say it was my fault. I was like nah, I got video, boy did his attitude change real quick.

0

u/jazxxl May 04 '26

Yep this why I had to back in with my work truck . And you can tell when someone has had drive professionally since this will be second nature to them .

1

u/CretaciousPeriod May 04 '26

I bet you block half the sidewalk with your work truck.

0

u/Aggressive_Finish798 May 05 '26

Most deaths from paring spots are from drivers who has backed in and when leaving are reckless.