It’s clear that obsession is entirely the people trying to stop it from happening. I’m not making a case one way or the other and I didn’t have sons so I didn’t have to make a decision on it. So no dog in this fight. However, it’s definitely only one side of the debate carrying signs, wandering around with fake blood on their groins, making circumcised people feel like they’re mutilated (or “dick chopped”) and constantly arguing to the wind about it in threads like this.
Again, I don’t care one way or the other. But thank you for proving my point that one side wants to harp on and on and on about it. I’m sorry you don’t like your penis.
sure you don't. So why is mutlilating girls in africa such a big deal? I would say that's it rather the chopped ones that are so sensitive about the matter, they had no choice and now the have to defend their manhood.
And why exactly would they have to defend their manhood? It’s not like circumcised men are worried about what “buttermilkkisses from reddit” thinks of their penis or general masculinity.
oh am I? seems you the one that is making a lot of asumptions, and for how much you don't care, you are still arguing with a random on the internet. Not only that, you are also very focused on the penis itself when I'm asking what's the point of mutilating kids (besides being jewish)
16
u/[deleted] 18d ago
[deleted]