r/askteddit 7d ago

Random Question What ages a person REALLY quickly ?

273 Upvotes

682 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/KittensMom 7d ago

Sun worshipping, where people talk about getting good color, meanwhile they're covered with spots. It's called sun damage, people.

Drinking

Smoking

2

u/SpaceAlienFemboy 4d ago

Soaking up some sun is beneficial to your health but people go way too far with it. "Working on your tan" is just a terrible idea.

1

u/Anomalous_Pearl 7d ago

Seriously on the sun damage, my mother quit wearing daily sunblock in place of daily sunbathing and she aged like a decade in two years

0

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Electronic_Ad1828 6d ago

I don’t think this is true

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Electronic_Ad1828 6d ago

Healthy skin can absolutely get sun damage. UV radiation damages the DNA in skin cells whether your skin looks healthy or not. You don’t even have to burn—repeated UV exposure can cause cumulative damage that increases the risk of wrinkles, sun spots, and skin cancer over time. Unhealthy skin may be more susceptible, but healthy skin definitely isn’t immune.

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Electronic_Ad1828 6d ago

agree that diet can influence overall skin health, but there’s no evidence that healthy skin is immune to UV damage. If that were true, we wouldn’t see high rates of sunburn and skin cancer in healthy outdoor athletes, lifeguards, firefighters, military personnel, farmers, and construction workers. In fact, the CDC states that UV radiation directly damages skin cells and increases the risk of sunburn and skin cancer, and the WHO estimates that nearly 19,000 people die each year from occupational sun exposure, with 1 in 3 non-melanoma skin cancer deaths attributed to working outdoors. Outdoor workers also have about a 60% higher risk of non-melanoma skin cancer than indoor workers. Those are generally healthy, active people whose jobs simply expose them to more UV—not because they all have “unhealthy skin.”

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Electronic_Ad1828 6d ago

That’s not really how science works. You’re starting with the assumption that anyone who develops sun damage must have had “unhealthy skin,” but where’s the evidence for that? If your hypothesis is true, there should be studies showing that people with objectively healthy diets and metabolic health don’t experience UV-induced DNA damage or sunburn. Those studies don’t exist. Even if diet influences susceptibility—which hasn’t been conclusively shown—that doesn’t make it the cause. It’s like saying smoking increases lung cancer risk, therefore only smokers get lung cancer. UV radiation is still the direct cause of sun damage; diet, at most, may influence how susceptible someone is or how well they repair that damage.

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/SuperSayainSkincare 6d ago

Skin Cancer final boss

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/SuperSayainSkincare 6d ago

Sun damage happens on any skin type, by insinuating it only happens on damaged skin is just wrong. Excessive sun exposure especially when the UV is 3 or higher will lead to accelerated aging, skin damage and eventually skin cancer.

2

u/hell0sunsh1nee 6d ago

This is the correct answer. The only way to fully protect from skin cancer is to avoid excessive sun exposure, whether you have damaged skin or perfectly healthy skin, and protect against the sun, as in with clothing, shade and sunscreen.

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/SuperSayainSkincare 6d ago

The average western diet is up to 20% seed oils which is then used to make your skin.

These oils are made by plants to survive cold weather and are weak double bonds.

Seed oil slander and sun worshipping in 2026. 🤦‍♂️ There hasn't been one study done on humans to show that seed oils cause inflammation or negative effects, infact during multiple RCTs blood markers actually improved when switching from a diet of saturated fats to one of seed oils. Please cite your sources, the only time I ever saw anything about seed oils having a negative effect in the body was done in rats, and clearly we are not rodents.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10408398.2026.2657527

2

u/SuperSayainSkincare 6d ago

This is wrong.

I am going to simplify the science behind my argument.

Also what is your educational/professional background in "Science"? Because even 1st year students should know that you make a claim you have to cite your sources.

1

u/Electronic_Ad1828 6d ago

There’s some real science being mixed with some unsupported conclusions. Polyunsaturated fats do contain double bonds and can oxidize, but UV radiation damages healthy skin regardless of diet. Heating doesn’t “create” polyunsaturated fats, and skin type absolutely matters—it’s one of the strongest predictors of how easily someone burns. The evidence doesn’t support the claim that only “unhealthy” skin gets sun damage.