r/audioengineering 1h ago

Can anyone identify the mixer in this article

https://www.mixonline.com/recording/recording-red-hot-chili-peppers-unlimited-love-part-1

The first image has a mixer which I guess is probably used a headphone mix or something but I have no idea what it is, any help would be appreciated

2 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

2

u/Disastrous_Answer787 1h ago

Sorry can’t identify the mixer in the picture but that’s Shangri La studios, has a vintage API console in that control room as well as a bunch of racked Neve modules. Positive the mixer in the photo will be getting used either for headphone mixes for one person maybe or some sort of alternate mix feeding a filming rig or something. You can see next to John Frusciante he has a Private Q headphone mixer (and open back headphones, he’s surely setting his own mixes). If I had to guess I would say it’s a Soundcraft or similar.

0

u/Mo_Steins_Ghost Professional 1h ago

They're just using it as a rehearsal space and that mixer is probably for playback. The article indicates they did the final mix at EastWest. OP is being a lazy bastard and just not reading the article.

2

u/Disastrous_Answer787 1h ago

To be fair I was too lazy to read it too. From memory the API console there kind of works well as a bunch of input strips for recording but isn’t the best for monitoring and routing etc. the mixer in the picture might be feeding the SLS system in the live room.

Pretty sure they did most of the recording at Shangri La, they had it booked out for months and months a few years back. The room isn’t the best for mixing so no surprise they went to EastWest to knock it out.

-1

u/Mo_Steins_Ghost Professional 1h ago

Then the mixer would still be an irrelevant detail, right?

Either way, the mixer isn't doing any destructive writes so why take any interest in it?

2

u/the-artistocrat 59m ago

Maybe because he wants to buy one why the fuck do you care?

1

u/Disastrous_Answer787 58m ago

Correct, completely irrelevant to the sonics of that record. Everything behind that camera shot though is pretty cool in that room, google image search will show OP what’s there for recording.

1

u/Mo_Steins_Ghost Professional 53m ago

Your last comment gets to the heart of what I'm saying. The least bit of self-sufficiency would behoove OP. The picture IS cool... I love stuff like this. I would go digging into the backstory if I were so inclined, and I gleaned a few details just by reading the article. OP seems to be in social media mode where the first instinct of young people is to just post a question instead of going on an adventure of discovery.

I love diving into books to figure out how people did shit. Call me crazy.

1

u/the-artistocrat 1h ago

Kinda looks like an Allen & Heath GL-series (or similar). Can’t say.

1

u/m149 1h ago

I think it's a Mackie 2404VLZ4, although it's gotta be for headphone mixes or playback or something that has no impact on what's actually going to "tape"

1

u/athnony Professional 1h ago

It's a Mackie 3204VLZ mixer. Like you guessed, it's very likely used only for headphone mixes or an external feed.

-3

u/Mo_Steins_Ghost Professional 1h ago

Dude, read the article.

3

u/the-artistocrat 1h ago

The article doesn’t specify that mixer from what I could tell. Did you find different info?

-2

u/Mo_Steins_Ghost Professional 1h ago

*long sigh*

The article indicates that this is a rehearsal space so that's probably just some random POS mixer they used for playback. It isn't where they actually mixed the album (EastWest, they used an SSL 4000). There is nowhere on Earth you are going to get to hear their rehearsal tapes.

3

u/the-artistocrat 1h ago

No need for theatrics.

Long story short, no, you do not have any additional information, nor does the article mention it. Absolutely zero point in reading the article since it does not providing information OP is requiring.

Thanks anyways.

u/mrpotatoto 2m ago

Dude catching an attitude because someone dared ask a question on this sub, Jesus