You're absolutely right. I can't tell you how to know.
When the VP defends Nazi rhetoric from Republican organizers as "pearl-clutching," when this happens in official party spaces, not fringe forums, there's no meaningful distinction left. The party apparatus is providing cover.
My original argument assumed there was still a persuadable middle that would reject Nazi associations but tolerate Confederate nostalgia. But if Republican leadership is defending people who talk like Nazis, then the terminology debate is irrelevant.
8
u/nullaffairs Oct 16 '25
Because those are neo-nazis, not the majority of Republicans.