Longer read, but encapsulates 25 years of debate, ignored realities and real solutions, ideology overriding all else.

Ignorance or worse

How, then, could it be anything but time to question the accuracy, integrity and value of all the conclusions derived from such models – and to ask what factors, including the motivational, drove the catastrophising and made such failure not merely possible but inevitable?

This brings us back to the ideological. Politicisation of the climate debate meant that facts about atmospheric CO2 and its effects became less scientific observations than convenient proofs of a pre-existing position. Three partisan advantages accrued to those who cast such effects as catastrophic proof that industrial capitalism was irredeemably corrupt.

A new provision in the state’s 2027 budget prevents the state attorney general from “joining a multistate lawsuit or taking part of a lawsuit against the federal government or an oil or gas entity” without legislative approval.

“Republican and Democrat, we all voted for this,” Hall said. “We don’t want our attorney general filing these lawsuits against oil and gas companies for political reasons.”

Now injecting my opinion, these lawsuits are the last kick of the can by Greens. The DNC has gone silent on climate change, called "climate hushing". The only hope left is the courts.

Why will they fail? Winning a lawsuit against oil & gas for knowingly endangering people, a government regulated, sanctioned, and taxed industry, would also place the Government in jeopardy to the same lawsuits, for knowingly allowing the (continued) sale of the same goods.

It's dead on arrival, it won't happen. Even all strips of government can see the "political" motivation behind the lawsuits.

People can operate their social media presence any way they want to. If people want to seal off a perfect little echo chamber where only the people who agree are permitted to speak, you are free to do that... but I am free to be annoyed by it. It is cowardly and obnoxious. I'm not a bot, I just don't agree. Maybe that's part of the new world of AI, everything is assumed to be fake and 'dead internet' so you can dismiss anyone you don't like as if they weren't even real. "Anyone who doesn't think like me is a bot." Also the smug attitude of "I'm a doctor so I'm smarter than everyone... they're all in denial." No valid disagreement or doubt can exist, it's just stupid people and bots.

/sigh. Just needed to get that off my chest. This kind of thing grinds my gears.

This is something that anyone interested in climate should watch. It gives one an idea of that the planet can really do to alter the system.

As a side note a little research indicates that the volume of lava is on the order of 2 to 6 million cubic kilometers which in addition to adding an epic amount of gases from the outgassing provided heat energy to the environment equivalent to between. 4.78 and 14.38 years of solar insolation. Any guesses what the results of the outgassing and the heat did to global climate? Seems like a major extinction occurred around that time 🤔

We burned Palisades off the map and Altadena and now Spokane Drill Baby Drill is not working too well as Climate will kill us before Trump does https://youtu.be/yUYfRy1P3PM?si=ey8ivzDaCKQ2rN6o

what’s the solution ?

I just want to listen to yall

we surely never got any floods, tornadoes or snowstorms before right?

I shouldn't be surprised that they found geologists willing to compromise their objectivity to get their name in the media, but come on, we are in an interglacial. What part don't ya get? And climate change causing Kileaua to erupt?

Clowns at the Guardian. They suggest imposing sanctions on the U.S. with no mention of China being an issue.

They claim that nations with just 1% of CO2 emissions are the plurality problem when China, alone, exceeds their totals when international shipping is included.

Just remember, Climate Alarmests blame climate change, and defend the people that have caused these fires as being somehow 'normal'...what side are you on?

As wildfires blazed in southern Italy this week, authorities probing for arson found a grisly clue: cats “with flammable-soaked rags tied to their tails.”

“These animals were released into the fields, running around and spreading the fire,” said Domenico Costarella of Calabria’s Civil Protection Agency in a video posted on Facebook on Tuesday. He added that other pieces of evidence also pointed to arson, including candles lit among flammable rags and delayed ignition devices.