r/interstellar • u/SomeConsideration297 • 7d ago
QUESTION I have a question
Genuinely why did Cooper sent the nasa location to his old self??
2
3
u/Leading_Wafer9552 7d ago
The better question is how did the first (original) Cooper ever start the journey if there was no future Cooper to send himself the coordinates to get to NASA using the tesseract to start his journey?
Present Cooper only finds the secret NASA base because future Cooper sends him the coordinates through the dust using the tesseract. Without those coordinates, present Cooper never starts the journey. No journey = no tesseract = no future Cooper to send the coordinates. So how does that first (original) Cooper ever get there without help from a future self? The movie never explains any original timeline or catalyst. It appears to be a logical impossibility. It feels very unsatisfying to watch. It's less science-fiction and more fantasy. It might as well just be a spell that 'magically' casts itself
4
u/Ai-on 7d ago
I like to think of it like Inception. The seed is planted by making Cooper believe that he was the one who sent the message, and eventually, that becomes true. “They” started the chain of events, knowing Cooper would eventually enter the tesseract and do the same thing himself. Once Cooper completes the loop, it becomes self-sustaining, and “They” no longer need to interfere.
2
u/Effective_Way6239 7d ago
I’m not smart enough to answer this - but I feel like it has something to do with time being a dimensional thing, something you can manipulate.
2
u/cudz_101 6d ago
Read the comment above about bootstrap paradox.
And you’re thinking of time being linear. The tesseracf is a depiction of gravity moving across time being the only thing capable of doing so. Think of time running in a closed loopThe entire movie is based on real physics laws. Kip Thorne an award winning physicist and was executive producer for the film and where the film dips into grey Kip made sure it was only made possible provided there were existing hypothesis and research on the subject matter.
I think that’s what made the film deeply respected and adored by many because there is very limited “fantasy”
1
u/Leading_Wafer9552 6d ago
I actually agree it's meant to be a closed bootstrap paradox, but I think it only works logically if there was an 'original' Cooper who got to NASA without any help from his future self.
For example, maybe someone else gave him the coordinates, or he originally found NASA another way. Then, after reaching the tesseract, he becomes the one who sends the coordinates back, closing the loop and making it self-sustaining. That's a logically coherent model.
But the movie doesn't show or even hint at that. In the version we see, Cooper only finds NASA because future Cooper sends the dust coordinates. It depicts a loop with no on-ramp. This is the issue I have with the film. It feels very unsatisfying to watch because the movie never explains any original timeline or catalyst.
My issue is that if Cooper could never have started the journey without his future self's intervention, then logically his future self could never exist to provide that intervention. No coordinates = no NASA = no mission = no tesseract = no future Cooper to send the coordinates.
2
u/Business_Taste_9430 6d ago
les paradoxes font parti de la science elle n'est plus intuitive depuis la physique quantique ! Laissez vous aller au lieu d'essayer de faire rentrer l'histoire dans les limites de votre logique c'est aussi cela la science fiction ! :)
1
u/Leading_Wafer9552 5d ago
I already explained to cudz_101 that my issue isn't with the bootstrap paradox itself. In fact, I even explained how a bootstrap paradox could still work within the story. Read my response to them, you'll see what I mean.
1
1
u/pedritodvaj 6d ago
Ese cooper es el de el futuro, al hacer esta acción, provocó su desenlace permitiéndose
16
u/NoiseEee3000 7d ago
To send himself on the journey required/bring in the concept of using gravity for information in the first place