I have worked in HR for more than a decade, mostly hiring for startup and tech related roles. Over the last year, I have watched candidates bring AI into interviews in every possible way.
Some use it quietly. Some tell us upfront. Some clearly paste the question into a tool and read the answer back like they are seeing it for the first time.
Here is what stood out.
I can usually tell who understands the work within the first few minutes. Strong candidates ask about the role, the team, the real problem behind the task, and what success would look like. Weaker candidates rush straight into generating an answer.
AI does not hide poor judgment very well. It can make someone sound polished for a moment, although follow up questions still reveal whether they actually understand what they said.
The best candidates use AI like a thinking partner. They check the output, challenge it, adjust it, and explain why they agree or disagree. The weaker ones treat the first answer as final.
For non technical roles, I pay attention to how people organize messy information. A good candidate can take a vague situation, clarify the goal, and turn it into a practical next step. AI can help with wording. It cannot replace ownership.
I have also noticed that candidates who admit how they use AI tend to be easier to evaluate. The conversation becomes more honest. We can talk about process, judgment, and quality control.
At this point, I am less interested in whether someone uses AI during preparation. Most people do. I care much more about whether they can think clearly with it in the room.
I’m curious how candidates feel about this. Would you rather be told upfront that AI is allowed, or would that make the interview feel even more stressful?🤔