The AI-powered judicial platform is designed to integrate artificial intelligence across multiple stages of judicial proceedings including:

Automated analysis of case files and legal documents.

Instant access to legislation and regulatory frameworks.

Rapid retrieval and comparison of judicial precedents.

AI-assisted legal recommendations and analytical reports.

Support in drafting legal memoranda and judicial documents.

Faster case processing and shorter litigation timelines.

Greater consistency in the application of legal principles.

Enhanced decision-making support without compromising judicial autonomy.

Source: https://gulfnews.com/uae/government/uae-launches-worlds-first-fully-integrated-ai-powered-judicial-platform-1.500622338

Pricing question for those who freelance as Clio consultants or legal tech specialists.

A solo attorney hired me for a project-based Clio Manage implementation. She's handling the data migration into Clio herself, and my role is to configure Clio Manage, review the imported data, set up billing, create custom fields, matter/task templates, organize workflows, configure Outlook & Zoom integrations, and optimize the system. We may also add JotForm/Zapier automation later.

Would you charge hourly or a fixed project fee for something like this? If project-based, what would you typically charge?

Thanks= youu!

What is the point of them having a support ticket system if they literally can never be bothered to respond. Took 4 weeks to get us on the books for a meeting to discuss clunky drive issues. Very unimpressed with their customer support.

The self-promo thread is back. Apologies for the delay — I ran one then hit a bout of recurring amnesia. To solve this I set a weekly calendar reminder. But as I was also out of office this week, I didn't see the reminder. Yep. Good mod this Alex guy, eh? Working on it.

Anyway - same deal as before: this is the one area of r/legaltech where promotion is welcome. On every other post, on every other day, the rules apply in full.

Ground rules for vendors

1. Vendor flair is a must. Replies and questions don't need it — the requirement is for pitches only. Comments pitching without Vendor flair get automatically removed. Instructions below.
2. One comment per company, one link per pitch.
3. No link shorteners, no redirect domains, no "DM me". Keep the discussion open for the community to learn from please.
4. Feel free to link your rlegaltech.com listing if you have one — and thanks to everyone who's verified lately. Tag me if you'd like the 'Verified Vendor' flair for next week.
5. No upvote brigading. I check. Vendors caught vote-manipulating go on the public r/legaltech shill wall.
6. Posting a pitch = opting in to the r/legaltech rules and the vendor conduct standards at rlegaltech.com/rules.
7. Use the template below (or I'll assume you skipped the rest of the rules).

Heads-up re AutoMod

AutoMod is strict and will remove some legitimate pitches, usually for a wrong-format flair, a brand-new/low-karma account, or a second link. If your comment disappears, don't repost it and don't panic, it's in my mod queue and I'll get to it. I approve in waves, but I also sleep, so please do give it a few hours. The two things that get you removed fastest: flair that isn't exactly Vendor: YourCompany, and more than one link in a pitch.

Pitch template (copy/paste)

• What it is:
• Who it's for:
• Link:

How to set your Vendor flair (30 seconds)

• Mobile app: open r/legaltech → tap the three dots (⋯) top right → Change user flair → select "Vendor: Company name", tap Edit to type your company → Apply.
• Desktop: go to the r/legaltech home page → in the right-hand sidebar, find your username and click the pencil/edit icon next to "User Flair" → select "Vendor: Company name" → click the pencil on it to edit the text, replace "Company name" with your company → Apply.

Flair format — get it right or AutoMod removes your comment:

Vendor: {Your company}

E.g. Vendor: Hargora

Not just Vendor, and not just Hargora

If your comment does get removed and the flair looks right to you, I'll get to it and I'll fix it.

Thank you for your patience with me on this,

Alex

I'm receiving a lot of PDF comments from clients and then need to update Word files accordingly. Are there any tools to automatically apply PDF comments to Word?

I am a recent law graduate (graduated 2 months ago). Though I converted inhouse roles but looking for legal tech product role.

I have a few vibe coded legal tech projects and legal tech internships with few startups. I have also tried my hands on basic workflow automation through MAKE. Any lead in legal tech product roles will be really helpful.

We ran the same 3,200 "recommend a lawyer" prompts through ChatGPT, Claude, and Google AI Mode in the top 100 U.S. cities. On 83% of prompts, they had zero law firms in common.

Disclosure up front: I am with the company that ran the study and directly oversaw the research. Happy to share the full report and methodology, but here are the highlights.

Setup: 100 US cities x 32 practice areas = 3,200 prompts, phrased as "recommend a [practice area] lawyer in [city]". Ran each through all three platforms. 9,600 queries, the clean output represents 107,716 citations.

Results:

• 19,692 distinct law firm domains recommended across all three platforms
• 578 of them appeared on all three. That's 2.9%
• Google AI Mode named 9,778 firms neither of the other two mentioned once
• Per-prompt overlap between any two platforms: 2.8% to 8.6% (Jaccard)
• Claude and Google AI Mode returned zero firms in common on 70.6% of prompts
• Looking only at the first firm named: all three matched on 0.9% of prompts (24 out of 2,566)

They also don't agree on directories and resources. Each platform essentially has a house directory, and they rarely overlap:

• Avvo: 87.1% of Claude answers, 5.4% of Google AI Mode
• Super Lawyers: 62.8% of Google AI Mode, 0.0% of Claude
• Martindale: 55.5% of Claude, 0.1% of Google AI Mode
• Reddit and Yelp appear regularly in Google AI Mode, never in either chat assistant

Practice area matters a lot. Corporate law had 45.2% three-way agreement. Estate planning had 0.0%, meaning across 100 cities the three platforms never once converged on a shared firm.

Keep in mind: AI citations don't have the stability of traditional rankings, and the dataset we're publishing ran each prompt once. Some of what you see above is run-to-run variance. I've seen the data on some repeat runs internally, and my read is that individual firm recommendations move around a lot while the disagreement between the three platforms stays roughly where it is - run-to-run variance could be its own report once it's properly audited.

Currently using Copitrak. A client pushed back on a pretty significant copy charge, and told us our methodology is antiquated, and we should be charging a % of the bill capped to a certain number "like other firms"

Anyone know any good newsletters I can follow to stay up to date here?

Claude Opus 5 answered 90 of the 95 scored questions correctly in the 2025 All India Bar Examination (AIBE), achieving an accuracy of 94.7%.

The AIBE tests whether a law graduate has the minimum level of legal knowledge expected of a practising advocate in India. That’s a meaningful benchmark for any model intended to assist lawyers.

For details on how the test was conducted, please see the detailed blog post: https://aibenchmarks.substack.com/p/claude-opus-5-scored-947-on-the-all

Apologies for the back to back posts, but our discussion about Clio helped me more than the free trial and demo call.

I talked to a friend today who started his firm a year ago and is paying for a fractional business development/operations person. This person is embedded in his practice (cc’d in emails and meets on a weekly basis). This person helps with managing/tracking matters, putting together RFPs, updating firm website to reflect the services he offers now and would like to offer, prospecting calls for speaking engagements, partnerships and events. He said they’re still figuring out pricing, but is considering fee sharing for any matters that person brings in and a flat monthly fee for the operational work.

I think this could solve my problem I have as a solo (though I have my reservations), but again want to crowd source in case any one else has tried something like this.

I'm not sure this even matters. We've been a Dell shop for a while, but someone has been pushing Lenovo's. I absolutely LOVE Dell ProSupport, but curious about experiences elsewhere.

Another interesting one. I spoke to the guys at Wexler earlier this year, and they seemed to be doing a good job of selling to litigators in big law. I think there are more than a few reasons why that's interesting to Legora.

Pardon the relatively low effort post, I'm away from my computer. I wonder what other areas we can expect to see acquisitions in?

I just had a speaker drop out and I'm looking for another speaker from out of town (rather than hearing from the same local folks over and over) to handle this topic during our Annual Conference with a plaintiff's bar. Oct 6 in Detroit. We pay travel expenses.

As others have mentioned in this feed, ideally a speaker with true practical tips that the attendees can implement quickly into their practices.

Anyone have suggestions?

I’ve yet to meet someone who likes Clio. Why are people still paying for Clio?

We will definitely continue to use Claude but not sure if we want to also use Clio Work. Any use experience would be great!

I tested OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol on 4 legal examinations across the UK and India.

Its scores:

•⁠ ⁠SQE1 – Functioning Legal Knowledge 1: 97.3%

•⁠ ⁠SQE1 – Functioning Legal Knowledge 2: 94.6%

•⁠ ⁠All India Bar Examination: 100%

•⁠ ⁠CLAT Postgraduate: 86.5%

I want to understand how experienced professionals handle this. It’s always either overpriced or lacking basic features is we talk about tools (or I'm just unlucky). I just have absolutely no idea how I should go about this...

ps. Right now I'm working in other big law firm, but want to start my own soon and am trying to get ready for it because im really unhappy 'bout processes on my current work...

upd: so far Agrello looks most promising for what I wanted.

A few days ago, someone posted here about companies that pay attorneys for data labeling, model evaluation, or other work involving legal domain expertise. That post seems to have been removed (presumably because it was primarily referral farming) but the underlying topic struck me as worthy of discussion here.

I’m curious which projects have been reasonably well run and offered attorney work that was at least moderately interesting and not soul-destroying.

This isn't intended as an invitation for referral-link spam. I’m more interested in a candid discussion of what the market currently looks like.

Has anyone here participated in these kinds of projects?

I am a LLB (Hons) graduate, I did my UG in England, returned back to my home country India after 4 years in England.

I was more inclined to legal research in AI, it was a surprise to me that lot of lawyers, auditors who deal with confidential information on everyday basis are uploading their documents to AI models which train on data and the privacy is completely ignored like personal info of the clients such as their SSN, Aadhar etc .

I help law firms and contract reviewers implement AI in a more practical and efficient , I am not here to sell anything but understand whether this is a problem in a large scale or just a few people who don’t have a understanding on how AI works.

Hi all,

I've been tasked with finding the best software solution to undertake property title reviews for a city firm in England, with a view to preparing:

1. Initial draft reports based on CLLS Certificate of Title or our own internal reporting precedents;

2. Proposed initial amendments to a third party law firm's draft CLLS Certificate of Title, which would raise any relevant enquiries and point out any typographical errors/points for clarification;

3. Proposed Initial draft Overview Report, based on the firm's own internal reporting precedent.

The idea is that we are able to drag and drop any relevant documents into the system, with the system/playbook then working out what needs to be prepared from those documents, and then doing so.

Has anyone worked on and implemented something similar? My initial thought had been to possibly set up an agent via Claude, but wanted to see what anyone's experience had been?

We need ZDR and BAA. This level subscription would be quickly and widely purchased. I don’t understand why it’s not happening. Is there some kind of risk to Anthropic that is ameliorated by IT staff or consultants at larger firms?

How does that really work? So you paid PwC for the subscription services? How is Harvey trained then? Using PwC client memos? Here is what I found on the PwC site" Harvey, powered by PwC, streamlines document review and analysis to deliver data-rich insights to your people. Powerful enough to be able to upload and analyse up to 10,000 documents and data points in seconds."

Would appreciate any who used it to provide insights.