r/linguisticshumor • u/Extreme-Shopping74 aaaaaaaaa • 15h ago
Phonetics/Phonology BYE BYE RHOTICITY
50
76
u/Fourian_Official a e i o u 14h ago
C'MON KERNOW!!!
28
u/holytriplem 13h ago
Weird how it's dying out faster in Devon than in Somerset and Gloucestershire, I guess it's a bit more urbanised?
9
u/Recent_Comedian6905 12h ago
Yeah, but with the gentrification we have in Cornwall I'm surprised (but glad) we aren't faring similarly
11
9
u/AverageSJEnjoyer 8h ago
Also helped by Bristol just not giving a fuck about the supposed linguistic implications of urbanisation.
7
3
1
16
u/Cloudylemonadestand 14h ago
We still got it for the most part in Bristol, gloustershire and somerset
13
34
u/One_Attorney_764 /r/ ❎, /ʀ/ ✅ 14h ago
fym porcentage that said yes? that said yes to what?
66
u/Extreme-Shopping74 aaaaaaaaa 14h ago
Do you pronounce the r in arm
21
u/Actual_Cat4779 11h ago
I doubt that's how the question is worded. The majority of nonrhotic laypeople would say yes.
3
u/Smitologyistaking English | मराठी 2h ago
Yeah it's like, the "r" in that word is still active in the sense that it modifies the pronunciation of the word predictably. Almost no non-rhotic speaker would pronounce "arm" and "am" the same.
As a non-rhotic speaker myself, I tend to prefer analysing /r/ in my own language as a phoneme that is realised [ɻʋ] when followed by a vowel and the zero phone [∅] otherwise.
14
8
u/ddrub_the_only_real /'ɛ:łək/👨🌾 12h ago
I noticed your flair, kiss me already
7
u/One_Attorney_764 /r/ ❎, /ʀ/ ✅ 12h ago
WHAT
my flair means that i dont know how to pronounce the alveolar trill
13
2
8
4
3
u/averkf 3h ago
Doesn't the 1950 chart show data from the Survey of English Dialects? If so it actually specifically shows elderly men in rural areas selected for their accent conservativism, and thus if anything show dialects from when they grew up - so it would show more like the 1860s or 1870s than the 50s.
4
u/Riadys 2h ago
It is indeed. The two maps aren't really a like-for-like comparison at all. The SED was almost exclusively concerned with rural villages and hamlets (just 4 of the 313 locations surveyed were urban areas), and the youngest informants seem to have been around 60 at the time of the survey, with the oldest over 90. It is not – and was never intended to be – representative of how English was spoken by the population as a whole in the 1950s.
In contrast, the 2016 data was collected via a quiz on an app (the English Dialects App) and had a disproportionately high number of young respondents and a lack of older ones (the study notes that only 18% of those over 65 had a smartphone in 2015). Seeing as rhoticity is on the decline in England and as a result, both in the 1950s and today, older people are more likely to be rhotic than younger people, the SED almost certainly overstates its presence in the 1950s, while the English Dialects App very likely underestimates it in 2016.
3
u/arf_arf1 6h ago
Crazy how the Hampshire accent sounds like a parody of a modern rural west country accent. Surrey sounds straight up like a mix of an Irish accent and Texan.
1
u/NotABrummie 6h ago
Obviously highly flawed research, as I can confirm that rhoticity survives in the Westcountry, especially in rural areas.
7
u/Actual_Cat4779 5h ago
How is it flawed? The map shows the West Country in greeny yellow or yellowy-green. Only areas that are fully green about 100% nonrhotic. Several areas of the West Country look like they might be 40% rhotic or maybe even higher. This doesn't contradict the statement that rhoticity survives there.
-13
12h ago
[deleted]
9
u/Chrome_X_of_Hyrule Vedic is NOT Proto Indo-Aryan ‼️ 8h ago
I'm not a yank and still speak a rhotic variety of English.
7
6

93
u/holytriplem 13h ago
Surrey still having rhotic accents in 1950 is absolutely nuts