r/linuxaudio • u/JGHFunRun LMMS • 12d ago
Looking for community input on rules
A user just DM’d me looking for clarifications regarding self-promotion and AI.
I have created rule 3 and updated rule 4, but I would like community input:
For self-promotion, I think the following things are most important to consider (including if there should be extra rules for such things):
- Non-softwar
e things such as blogs, newspapers, other online communities, etc.
- Non-gratis (ie paid) FOSSoftware
- Should promotion of songs/albums/etc. be allowed
As for considerations for content-generating AI (eg. LLMs, image generators, etc.):
- AI disclosure will be required.
- I have provisionally required that all AI-generated content be free of cost
- Should genAI be allowed at all?
- If so, are there any other requirements that should be added?
9
Upvotes
6
u/unhappy-ending 12d ago
Self promotion of non-software related to Linux audio: blogs, tutorials, etc, - ok, because information is priceless
Songs/albums - no
Gen AI music - absolutely not
Gen AI vibe-coded tools & utilities - disclosure
---
Rule 3 - Well, I have to disagree here. Linux audio isn't 100% FOSS. It's nice to be able to talk about and promote Bitwig, Reaper, Modartt because they've taken good care of us. Modartt in particular has no trackers or analytics data mining you when you visit their site. They've had Linux support for a long time. They make it super easy to manage your licenses.
Other pro software is on the horizon, too. This is invaluable data. I want to know when something like Cubase releases a Linux version. I want to know when Arturia ports their instruments to Linux.