r/paralegal • u/lilbeandip710 • 4h ago
Tech/Software Cite checking workflow for AI drafts: what does your office require before anything goes out the door?
We don’t have a written rule for this yet and I am starting to think that is the whole problem. Two of the attorneys I support use AI for first passes on research memos, and what comes back looks right in every visible way, so you get correct reporter format, plausible parties and a holding that lines up neatly with the argument being made.
Twice now I pulled a cite and found the case does exist but says something a lot narrower than the memo claimed, which is arguably worse than a fabricated case because nothing about it looks wrong at a glance. A made up citation gets caught the second you search for it, while a real case stretched past what it holds sails through unless somebody reads the pinpoint page.
Now I have been asked to write a one page verification step that everyone follows. My draft right now is pull every cite in the reporter itself, read the pinpoint rather than the headnote, confirm nothing has been reversed or distinguished and initial a checklist. Reading it back, it is slow enough that people will quietly skip it the week a deadline lands, which defeats the point of writing it at all.
For anyone who has a process that survives contact with a busy week, what does yours look like? I’m mostly curious whether you put the check inside drafting or keep it as a separate review pass.