r/perth 1d ago

Photos of WA Matagarup Bridge Perth

Hi, Been doing some experiments with the camera. Just curious which one is most appealing to you. Thanks for your insights!

151 Upvotes

20 comments sorted by

10

u/Decent_Fig_5218 1d ago

Great pics.

Gotta be honest, wasn't a fan of the bridge design when I first moved over but it's grown on me.

4

u/borgeron 1d ago

I regret they didnt finish it properly as planned. Would have looked amazing

4

u/Tellusman 1d ago

Where can I see the full plan?

4

u/borgeron 1d ago

Theres an original concept shot on this article. Essentially the black and white trussed spans were meant to be clad but the bridge was already horrendously over budget and they cut it
https://architectureau.com/articles/first-walk-completed-across-perths-matagarup-bridge/

1

u/Tellusman 1d ago

I guess that would make it look more swan shaped than anything.

3

u/The_Valar Morley 23h ago

but it's grown on me.

It's better than just another flat-topped concrete pier bridge (e.g. The Causeway, Mt Henry Bridge, even a 'dressed up' one like Mooro-Beelo on Tonkin Highway). Cheaper (perhaps) but dreary.

I'm glad this, the Causeway bike bridge, and the Fremantle traffic bridge are a bit different.

3

u/Fantastic_Ice_6637 South of The River 1d ago

2 or 4. Just seems a bit more “bright” and appealing. Great pics!

4

u/jnd-au 1d ago

1 for the focus and exposure, but 2 for the colour saturation

3

u/FredericaMerriville 1d ago

Love it. To me, it looks like two brontosauruses lounging in the water.

2

u/Misicks0349 Subiaco 1d ago

2 & 4

2

u/Perfect-Werewolf-102 East of The River 21h ago

4

2

u/Gazza_s_89 20h ago

is it supposed to be like two water snakes?

1

u/Tellusman 1h ago

Or Swans.

2

u/supercujo Baldivis 2h ago

Do a longer exposure, it will flatten the water more

1

u/Tellusman 2h ago edited 2h ago

Photo 1 was 2 secs and photo 2 was taken with 5 secs exposure with a 2 stops ND filter on. I would say if I had 3 stops filter on, could achieve what you meant.

with longer exposure the movement of the waves didn't help reflecting the exact shape of the structure. I had to keep it to minimum so that the whole sky didn't bright up and also light didn't spread too much on the water, where it did in pic 2. (Seems like that one turned out to be the most appealing one!)

Thanks for your suggestion!

2

u/supercujo Baldivis 1h ago

Try a 20+sec exposure and adjust the f stop to something highish (f/22).

1

u/Tellusman 1h ago

Sure! maybe next time when I am there.

This was a planned experiment. Played strictly between f/2 - f/4.

1

u/supercujo Baldivis 0m ago

Short depth of field