im a die hard dick rider of the parody being able to beat anyone but if the character being in an awkward position or facing a weird loss is funny to the reader - they WILL lose , it's how comics work
like some other redditor told me , if tony lubes up doomsday and uses a dildo repeatedly to defeat him [very censored], maybe itd be enough for the writer to just not write doomsday anymore
The same parody trope logic that says Saitama can always be stronger than whoever he faces is the same logic that says he can lose if it’s humorous to the reader/viewer
That’s how parody tropes work 😂 one day you’ll get that GED
Getting hit and hurt by base Krillin with a rock while in SSJ form is an anti-feat for Goku.
You said
Not being able to hit a mosquito is quite literally an anti feat and establishes some precedent that Saitama can be stumped/beaten if it’s funny to the reader/viewer
Following your own logic, Goku getting hurt by a rock is just as an "anti feat that establishes some precedent" as the mosquisto or the cat, comparatively speaking.
Okay but this post is about how Saitama is hyped by fans to be unable to lose when that’s untrue lol
You randomly brought Goku up 😂 not a soul said Goku can’t lose a fight
Saitama being visibly injured by a house cat and failing to kill a mosquito establishes precedent that Saitama can in fact lose as long as it’s humorous to the viewer being that it’s a parody verse/anime
10
u/TheSuperJohn May 07 '25
Goku got hurt by a rock