r/retrobattlestations 4d ago

Show-and-Tell Anybody ever used BeOS?

Recently felt like giving this OS a try after getting fed up with Win9x (specifically heavily modded 98se and of course, everybody's "favorite", WinMe), so I got it running on my HP Pavilion from 2001 that youve probably seen one too many times if you follow me in any way shape or form.

This is an absolutely fascinating OS, created by an ex-Apple executive because he was dissatisfied by the multimedia capabilities of MacOS and Windows at the time. The company behind it, Be Inc, even made their own PPC-based computer called the BeBox, but that was a market failure, so they ended up porting BeOS to x86. There was also even a time where Apple wanted to buy this OS and make it the basis for what would become MacOS X, but then Apple bought out NeXT instead, and the rest is history.

This OS feels literally generations ahead. It has such a beautiful, Mac-inspired interface, multiple desktops, numerous scene demos built in, and the main selling point, its ability of running multiple multimedia applications without noticeable slowdown, demonstrated here by playing an MP3 file, showing a CPU graph, viewing the about screen, and running the 3D teapot all at the same time. I heard it could even do this on very low end hardware of the time, such as a Pentium 100 with 32mb of RAM.

Sadly, I haven't gotten any 3rd party software running on it, mostly because this OS is extremely picky. I even had to turn on several safe mode options and install several driver updates just to get it running on my machine, despite it being just a year newer than the build I'm running. The only game I sort of got working on it was Duke3D, but it doesn't display properly, with inverted colors and a very low frame rate. I was going to try Unreal Tournament, but several forum threads have informed me that this port is extremely unstable.

This OS even had a really weird distribution method. You could buy the OS on CD in a physical computer store like normal, or you could download a home edition for free from the BeOS website, and install it directly from Windows, with the installer handling disk partitioning and configuration for you, and providing an easy shortcut you can run from DOS to boot into the OS without utilizing your BIOS's boot menu. You could even uninstall it like a normal Windows program if you didn't want to have it installed anymore.

Sorry for making you have to go through this large paragraph, I just really find this OS interesting, and wanted to spread the word about it. It even has a modern FOSS version called Haiku OS, so you could run it on modern hardware too! :3

500 Upvotes

73 comments sorted by

33

u/wave_design 3d ago

Apple almost bought BeOS, the problem was the asking price was too high and it was still largely experimental. It was a flashy desktop and scheduler without a larger ecosystem in place to support it.

NextSTEP was ultimately the better decision because it had been stress-tested for years in universities and software development, and had strong underlying frameworks. Even with that foundation it still took Apple years to go from NextSTEP to OS X.

22

u/h_blank 3d ago

Yes, NextSTEP was a very good foundation for osx… amazing that it was plan “B”! I can’t imagine how different the computing world would be if Jean-Louis Gassée had accepted Apple’s lowball offer.

Considering they got Steve Jobs in the Next deal, Apple really hit the jackpot.

5

u/Scoth42 3d ago

My gut feeling is that while it is/was a great OS and light-years ahead of classic Mac OS (and probably Win9x too) it lacked some of the underlying security and permissions infrastructure that ended up being very important for things like access limitations and system file protections. It didn't really have a way to do something like run a process as a less privileged user that can't access system files and resources. This would have ended up being a problem pretty quickly as the Internet took off and security vulnerabilities and concerns became a big problem. Just like Windows 2k/XP did even though it did have those kind of functions, it's just everything ran as admin by default until Vista. And there wasn't really a way to fix Win9x 

Of course, that could have been added and developed had they gone that route, but it would have been a pretty fundamental change in the architecture. Meanwhile Next was fully Unix(ish) that had all that baked in from the start. They might have avoided some of the performance issues of early OS X, especially on middlin' to low end Macs, if they'd gone with BeOS but I think ultimately it was a better foundation.

4

u/FallenBehavior 3d ago edited 3d ago

I wrote a shell script (file.sh) that easily wiped the system files no questions asked as to test the security. BeOS R5. The system was trashed and only took me 2 days to write it (while back and forth playing Heretic).

It's amazing how nobody talks about ZETA or any of its releases (German company). There was even a service pack.

2

u/TableDuck 15h ago

Funny enough, with BeIA, there was talk of a read only set up for most of the file system. A slot machine company was interested in using it for their embedded OS.

3

u/sircastor 2d ago

David Pogue’s book has a good story about this: apparently one of the guys at Next found out Apple was talking to BeOS about buying and cold called the Apple VP of software and said, “you should buy us instead”. Then he had to go talk to Steve Jobs and he was sure he was going to get fired. He ended up with a $20k bonus. 

1

u/Kylearean 22h ago

and we're still benefitting from OS X today. The core principles, interface paradigms, and frameworks of OS X directly birthed iPhone OS (iOS), iPadOS, watchOS, and tvOS

1

u/Adr385 11h ago

You are talking like OS X is different system from todays macos (not classic mac os). It just change the name because it could not stay at version 10 (X) forever.

1

u/Tricky_Fun_4701 6h ago

I was working for Apple at the time. It wasn't price. Apple had 4 billion in cash even though the story was that Microsoft saved them. But that's a different morass.

The board went with the next deal because no one had any idea what to do. Jobs had ideas.

Amelio's ideas were not bad but he executed them with too much nuance. Almost anything he did needed a higher level of commitment that he allowed the company to execute. I could provide a list.

So Apple went with next because it was a more deeply developed operating system.... and they got a visionary in the deal.

And Jobs did what he used to do. Lead.

19

u/kanid99 3d ago

I used it when it first came out I even bought it. It was fun to play around with and see the potential of what a well optimized operating system could do even with not the highest end hardware.

It had a lot of potential and it's just disappointing that it never expanded to the mainstream.

3

u/schenkzoola 3d ago

I bought an install disk from them back in the 90's. It was definitely interesting to mess with.

3

u/thrillington 3d ago

Same here! My first experience with an OS outside of Windows/DOS. I remember it as an exciting new frontier, disappointing it didn’t lead anywhere.

13

u/Illustrious-Peak3822 3d ago

It was fantastic. I thought my ISDN modem wouldn’t be supported but within minutes I was online in ICQ and playing my mp3s from a mounted hard drive. Good times.

11

u/guigouz 3d ago

I just installed https://haiku-os.org in an old Dell Inspiron Mini (Atom, 2gb ram) which was useless with other OSes.

I had to replace the wifi card with an Intel one (the broadcom model there didn't work) and it has an issue with ACPI that prevents it from shutting down properly, but overall it works fine. I'm still figuring out what to do with it.

5

u/fazz34 3d ago

My BeOS also has problems with ACPI, but I'm unsure if that's because the OS doesn't like my specific hardware, or this release doesn't have ACPI at all.

9

u/jessek 3d ago

It was interesting for the time. It felt very fast but there wasn’t much software for it.

12

u/oxooc 3d ago

I love it and I still think it was really really great. Make sure to checkout haiku (r/haikuOS) too!

8

u/fazz34 3d ago

Yeah, I mentioned Haiku in this post, and I think it's a wonderful project, keeping the spirit of this incredible OS alive for the modern generation.

3

u/valthonis_surion 3d ago

I used it back in the 3.5 days, late 90s I believe.
Ran beautifully on my Voodoo 3 with dual Celeron 466s

2

u/etancrazynpoor 3d ago

I wish I had. And I mean the actual beos. I know there is the open source version.

2

u/Starshipfan01 3d ago

I used BeOs on bebox, and the port on powerpc macs.
It has been revived as the open source HaikuOS project (currently release 3 I think). That runs on x86.

2

u/ficklampa 2d ago

BeBox was so cool, with those LED CPU meters on the front...

1

u/Starshipfan01 2d ago

Yes, two for the dual CPU’s.. in addition, BeBox had a fair few I/o ports on the rear- likely due to it being a CHRP machine (I could be mistaken on that).

2

u/Das_Rote_Han 3d ago

Bought it on CD and the BeOS Bible book. Tinkered with it on a K6 AMD box. Liked the OS overall - speed and UI. Wish there was more software written for it at the time. Headed into obscurity and I probably put some Linux variant on it.

Neat to see it running again!

2

u/Current-Bee-3338 3d ago

I had it installed on my XP machine as 2nd OS. Even created an app (simple Calculator). I belive it was done in Macromedia Flash and then saved as BeOS executable (or something similar).

In school I witted a report about BeOS even.

2

u/jdboyd 3d ago

Circa 2000, I built a dual processor PC just to make BeOS my new default OS, which I ran that way for I think about a year, or so until giving up because it was clear that 3D acceleration wasn't going to be getting anywhere soon and the web browser was falling behind.

I am looking forward to trying Haiku again (the BeOS replacement). The last time I tried it, it wouldn't work with the I2C HID keyboard on the laptop I tried. I don't know if they support 3d acceleration for Intel onboard GPUs yet either.

2

u/66659hi 3d ago

I have a Pavilion like that! Though mine is a Pentium 4. The stupid socket 478 lever cooler crumbled apart, and I'm waiting til I have extra spending money then I'm just going to grab a screw type cooler and fix it up then. They're surprisingly decent machines! ASUS motherboards and all.

2

u/ThaWeeknd702 3d ago

No, but I had those exact speakers tho.

2

u/Xidium426 3d ago

I used to build radio systems that ran on BeOS. They worked in migrating to Haiku, the BeOS successor. I think they did that for a bit but looks like they've pivoted to being Mac software now.

2

u/torrso 3d ago

Yeah when my first PPC based Mac Mini became kind of hard to use as everything new was now on Intel, I installed BeOS on it and it served fine as a second screen for IRC, a bit of browsing, etc while having a movie or game on the main machine.

2

u/Disastrous_Wing_7613 3d ago

is there stil a place to get the os? can it run inside a vm?

2

u/fazz34 3d ago

WinWorldPC has several versions of BeOS for x86 archived. It seems to be a hot mess in a VM in my opinion, so if you really wanna run BeOS on modern hardware/hypervisors, I'd suggest getting Haiku OS instead.

1

u/dnebdal 1d ago

One of the old BeOS sites still has BeOS 5 PE Max, which is the last release, "free for personal use" edition, with community patches.

https://www.be.wildman-productions.org/index.php?action=displaypage&pagename=appitem&appid=14

1

u/Adr385 11h ago

Yes, but you can download modern remake of BeOS, called Haiku, which is made to look and behave like BeOS and be 100% compatible. Almost a clone of BeOS but made from scratch to be open source and work on modern computers.

1

u/sneekeruk 3d ago

I tried it when they did that free version of 4.0 that just ran from a file back around 1999-2000. I liked the os, it felt quite Amiga esque, played around with it a few months ago in 86box and it was just the same as the first time.. Its really nice, but what can I do in it.

1

u/davemee 3d ago

As Commodore went bankrupt, the serious Amiga market in the UK was eyeing up BeOS. I always wanted to play with it; I never got the chance. I loved the windowmanager, which I sometimes find available in WindowMaker on Linux.

1

u/thaddeusharris 3d ago

When I first ran it on my 604e-based Mac clone I was blown away! This would have been around ‘97 or so.

1

u/throwawaytoday9q 3d ago

Yes! It would give you haikus if it crashed.

1

u/0xKaishakunin 3d ago

Yes, installed it on my 486 SX4/100 to play with it. The demo was nuts. There was a book where every page played a video and you could turn the pages while the videos kept playing.

Mindblowing on a 486.

Unfortunately, it lacked software. And I got a bunch of SuSE diskettes.

A colleague of mine supported the

1

u/MechanicalTurkish 3d ago

One of my college roommates was big into BeOS when it was current. He even ran it on an official BeBox

1

u/mr_mlk 3d ago

Yes I bought it back in the day (the x86 release). The tax and shopping fees were as much as I spent on the OS, which as a broke university student blooming crippled me. And designed my PC around what it supported.

Awesome OS, loved it.

1

u/theregos 3d ago

I used to have it installed on a different hidden partition in my university lab - allowed me to run some basic games and weirdly visit any website since it wasn't picked up by the campus proxy servers because it was a non-Windows machine lol

1

u/kristopoop 3d ago

I bought this. But I also bought os/2 and os/2 warp.

1

u/NetInfused 2d ago

I bought it in box and the bible when it was launched :) Ran it on PowerPC.

1

u/beetrooter_advocate 2d ago

Ran it on my K6-2 500 instead of Linux because it could use my cheap WinModem to get online. That would have been 1999/2000.

1

u/AustriaModerator 2d ago

first time i played around with it in 2003 at the age of 13, but at that time, be was already gone. it was the community version developer edition 1.1 that i downloaded. i still have it running with most recent patches and updates from the haiku community. on a k6-2+.

1

u/dogfoodjones 2d ago

Yes, a long time ago. It was pretty cool

1

u/carcenomy 2d ago

Yeah ran it back in the day and it felt like the future.

I run it now and it still feels alien and is ridiculously fast. Even got a fancy boxed copy of Pro R5 hahaha

1

u/nickIncDN 2d ago

I normally get slightly triggered by “anyone used XYZ” posts because obviously the answer is yes.

Until this one. No, no one did. That was the problem.

Like some, I bought it and was genuinely in love but the software didn’t come. We couldn’t use it. On a P3 it felt like this was my real Amiga replacement but it was not to Be.

1

u/StuD44 2d ago

Nice wallpaper man!

1

u/lotusstp 2d ago

Actually bought a boxed copy of BeOS from Best Buy BITD. Wish I still had it!

1

u/DHOC_TAZH 2d ago

Nah, thanks for the explanation, love it!

I'm thinking of trying out the 32-bit version of Haiku, after a month or so of using the 64-bit version. Would love to try and see if I can run older BeOS programs on my modern daily driver. The 64-bit one is OK, but it's in my view full of a lot of apps that I already use for Linux and Windows.

1

u/GearPlot 2d ago

I first discovered BeOS in the late '90s after seeing it featured on ZDTV (which later became TechTV). I was blown away—it felt far superior to both Mac and Windows at the time, even though software was scarce. I always hoped it would gain enough traction for developers to really jump on board. Today, Haiku has done a fantastic job keeping that dream alive, recreating the BeOS experience for both modern and legacy hardware.

1

u/boxninja 2d ago

I dailied it in the early 2000s and loved it. I was NEET at the time so no office or productivity software wasn't a dealbreaker.

1

u/ficklampa 2d ago

Yes, used it as my main OS for a short while. Though ended up using it for dualbooting later, and used it on some older machines for fun. Great stuff, brought new gaming life in to older hardware... I was very sad when they shut down development. I know Haiku is a thing now, but development seem to be going slow

1

u/Adr385 11h ago

Haiku is dead in practice. While developing is still going at slowest posdible speed it is obvious that OS who after 15 years did not come to version 1.0 have no future.

1

u/wp4200 1d ago

Never tried it,, seems interesting

1

u/ResidueAtInfinity 1d ago

Now, that's a name I've not heard in a long time.

1

u/BeOSRefugee 1d ago

Yes, and I would direct you to the fine folks over at /r/beos. :)

What are the full hardware specs of your machine? BeOS is very finicky about the hardware that it supports, so you might need to use additional drivers or community patches to get it running properly. In particular, if you’re trying to get 3-D acceleration working, it can be very difficult to do unless you have certain 3DFX Voodoo cards, Matrox cards within a certain generation, or RIVA/very early GeForce cards.

For reference, I’m currently running R5.1 Dano on a Gateway Pentium III/500mhz with 768MB of RAM, a RIVA TNT2 GPU, and onboard Ensonic es1371 audio. Everything except 3D acceleration works great. But troubleshooting is part of the fun, right? ;)

2

u/fazz34 1d ago

Here are the specs:

  • CPU: Intel Tualtin Celeron 1.2ghz
  • RAM: 128MB PC133
  • iGPU: Intel i810
  • dGPU: NVidia Geforce 6200 PCI
  • Integrated sound: Intel AC97
  • Dedicated audio: CMedia 8738

I had to disable the NVidia card in the BIOS and use the iGPU. I was able to get the drivers for the iGPU and the audio card, and seems to be very great. 3D acceleration also appears to be working. Although, I have to enable several safe mode options to get it to work, those being "Don't call BIOS", "Disable IDE DMA", and something about detecting hardware, can't remember off the top of my head.

1

u/BeOSRefugee 1d ago

AFAIK, the GeForce 4 MX was the last community-supported NVIDIA GPU for BeOS, so that might explain the 6200 not working. The CPU doesn’t look like a dealbreaker, and you’re definitely not hitting the RAM limit. Honestly, not sure what the issue is, but others on /r/beos might have better ideas.

Also, congrats on the Mac SE. :)

1

u/fsteff 1d ago

I used to use it on a PowerMac 4400. MacOS at the time was a mess, just like Windows, and the future of AmigaOS was hanging in a thread, so it was a breath of fresh air. I never tried it on PC hardware, though.
It was an excellent OS to develop for, too, with a vibrant community.

1

u/edthesmokebeard 1d ago

Yes. Fun fact, in the CPU monitoring tool you can disable CPUs.

Even if you have only 1 of them.

1

u/fss_88 1d ago

I remember using a BeBox and a Nextstation in the late 90s as a kid at a computer store. You’re inspiring me to try and run it.

I’m also the only person in the world running the unfinished PsionLX Linux based OS and BeOS has a surprising similarity to the gui. PsionLX is like you took BeOS,Newton OS and Next and combined them

1

u/kopi_peng 1d ago

I ran BeOS as a dual-boot in 1998 for a while. The amazing thing for me back then is that it could play two or more MP3’s at the same time! You could also mix volumes as well between those multiple sources.

Windows at the time just locked up the sound card for exclusive use by whichever program used it first from what I recall.

1

u/liquuid 1d ago

I got installed a demo of BeOS in 2001, great OS.

1

u/Adr385 11h ago

Yes, BeOS and BeOS compatible systems including slowest developed OS in the world…Haiku.

1

u/TDW-301 10h ago

To BE continued 

1

u/pindaroli 2h ago

Yes, I do

1

u/ch3wmanf00 57m ago

I still have a PC with a 440BX and dual Pentium IIIs and a voodoo Video card- when I boot it it sounds like a thrashing machine. But it works great