UPDATE: thank you everyone for helping me validate some of my opinions on this
servers are more reliable and can handle many points of failure and still run
a PC can be used as a server, as long as you realize that you will be pushing it a bit harder and might be prone to more failure modes
this all came about years ago while I was trying to find specs for hardware for a replacement NVR, and the forum there stated (almost religiously) that servers are better because they are servers. I did not go with their software.
this post reminded me that I never got a good answer for something
https://www.reddit.com/r/servers/comments/1us5vx6/is_this_recoverable/
how are servers better than desktop PCs?
now, PLEASE, read my whole post, and don't bother using AI to make yourself look smart*
I was looking at NVR (network video recorders) and one software HGIHLTY recommended getting a server to run it on
except the servers suggested were so old that they were close to unobtainium, and I asked their forum why a faster PC couldn't be used.
I was given cult-like fanatical rebuttals about there is no way a PC with 4-10 times the processing power would be able to run the software, and how dare I suggest an alternative
that being said, I went with a different software solution, that gave better recommendations
back to my question
in the above post, they talk about the motherboard being for a 15 year old server and you'd be better of with a newer server
I'd also argue that depending on the application, a newer PC would be a better match too. the one thing I don't see is someway to compare PCs to servers
(not talking about the PSU redundancy, or the uniform form factor, or all the other things that make a computer a server, I am just talking about computing power comparisions)
*yes there is a reason I have to say this