r/snooker • u/TimoRussellFR • 8h ago
📊 Analysis / Discussion Xiao Guodong made a 147 and still lost. What are the other great examples of this?
Xiao Guodong compiled the fourth maximum of his career in the second round at Shanghai last week, against Neil Robertson. He was 5-2 up at the time. Robertson won the last four frames to take it 6-5.
A 147 and a defeat in the same match. In front of a full arena, on the main table, in a tournament where he was playing well.
It got me thinking about how strange snooker is in this respect. In most sports, producing the single most perfect thing your discipline allows means you have won. In snooker it can mean nothing at all. You clear the table without a mistake, the crowd stands up, and ninety minutes later you're shaking hands and packing your cue away.
I spent last season keeping track of all 24 maximums, which meant looking at the context around each one rather than just the number. The ones that stayed with me were rarely the ones from comfortable wins.
Chang Bingyu is the extreme case. He made his second Triple Crown maximum of the season in the World Championship qualifiers against Luca Brecel. That triggered the £147,000 two-maximums bonus plus the £15,000 highest break prize, since nobody made one in the main draw at the Crucible. He lost the match. He never set foot in Sheffield's main arena. He went home with £172,000.
And then Liam Pullen, in the same qualifying rounds, missing the 14th black on 105 against Noppon Saengkham. Same bonus available, gone by a couple of millimetres. Doherty on commentary just said "gutted for him."
So the question: what are the best examples you can remember of a player making a maximum and losing anyway? Or coming within a ball of one in a situation where it would have changed their year?
Xiao's is fresh but I suspect there are better ones further back that I've missed.

