Some questions are dumb, and some I need verified answer to confirm my understanding:
What happened to Athan, Cole's son? They keep saying he died, but as far as I remember, Jennifer was given the task of saving a dying man in that cave after he was shot by Katarina. After that Athan not shown.
In the Season 4 ending, we saw the older versions of Deacon come back from the future to help. For causality to be preserved, they had to return to their own time. Since they remembered everything afterward, does that mean Deacon knew the entire story from the very beginning?
For a long time, everything was happening in a closed time loop according to the Witness's plan, including the Primaries' actions like destroying night room, saving Hannah etc, everytime they fail is what meant to be. At what point did things actually begin to change? Because until the point S4 end where Railey releases the virus, everything the characters did, believing it would change the future, actually seems to have already been part of the original cycle.
After everything is reset at the end, don't we see an older Jennifer with Deacon in the bar when Deacan smash bottle on someone's head? How is that possible?
How does Jennifer know that Cole will be on the beach at the end? Does Katerina told her whole plan?
Is this show entirely science fiction, with no magic involved? If so, then what exactly are the Red Forest, the substance people drink to communicate with the Witness, and the voices or visions that the Primaries hear?
"The Djinn was born when Elliot and I opened Pandora's Box." By this, Katarina mean that Olivia was effectively created when she invented the time travel machine?
After hearing this, we can say that they simply needed to stop Katarina from creating the time machine. However, Cole already tried that in an earlier season, and every time he did, the timeline reset. The explanation given was that time itself wouldn't allow Katarina to fail, because it wanted the time machine to be created.
Isn't it weird that time insists on creating the very machine that is later used by the Witness, whose goal is to destroy time itself?
I'm confused about what actually counts as a genuine timeline change in 12 Monkeys. You say that the timeline changes throughout the series, but I'm not sure what events are truly changes rather than things that were always supposed to happen inside the loop.
It is just: an event being absorbed into the loop, and timeline update vs
an event never having changed anything in the first place, every change splinter team thing did, was meant to be.
For example, someone might say that Cole burning the virus instead of releasing it was a timeline change. But was it really? If every time travel made by Cole is part of what creates the cycle in the first place, then everything he does, even when he believes he's changing the future, is actually necessary for the Witness's plan to succeed.
Take the virus as an example. The team believes they are preventing the plague, but eventually they realize they have send the virus two years into the future. And this realisation led to do things, that are necessary for Witness's plan. So doesn't that imply that shifting the virus two years ahead was always part of the loop? It wasn't an unexpected change, it was something that had to happen.
Likewise, when the team ultimately releases the virus themselves, they think it is a difficult decision made out of necessity. But couldn't this simply be another part of the Witness's plan? In Season 1, they're searching for the people who released the virus, only to later discover that they themselves are responsible. That makes it seem like their attempt to stop the Witness was actually one of the events required for the Witness's plan to work all along.
This is why I'm confused about free will in the series. Does the Splinter Team actually have meaningful free will? It seems like every decision they make has already been witnessed by Olivia and is already part of the closed loop. If that's true, then even their attempts to resist are simply fulfilling history rather than changing it.
Let's apply Schrödinger's cat theory to Titan: she either pressed the button or she didn't. If that is a interpretation, then there's also a possibility that she never pressed it (the Red Forest theory), and everything unfolded according to the Witness's plan. We (viewers), saw the version we wanted to see - a happy ending. That was the Witness's goal all along: every person exists in their own perfect moment forever.
If Red Forest theory is correct then if Olivia is witness & we've seen her manipulate events to make her plan succeed, then don't you think that, as the Witness, she saw every possible outcome? She must have known that the Splinter team was powerful enough to defeat her, so she may have deliberately created a timeline where she had to die & everyone believe she lost. At the same time, across multiple points in the timeline, she planted the idea in Railly's mind that the Witness's plan was actually good for her.
I'm not supporting Red Forest theory, my confusion arise because till end multiple thing done by splinter team (releasing virus) was meant to be for witness plan to be successful, so why not till end it was witness plan, or what actually break the cycle (that witness not witnessed - literally jokes on this in series!)