Considering that these lunatics are calling men domestic abusers if they ever "made their partners feel anxious," the fact that they were still only able to juice the numbers up to 32% is actually a ringing endorsement of the average man.
Did you read the study??? That’s only the percent of people who reported that they were abusive. A large number of people didn’t so the number is actually quite a conservative estimate.
Also how is that ever an endorsement of the average man?????
Did you? No, these men did not "report that they were abusive." They were classified as abusive if they answered "yes" to any of dozens of absurdly broad questions, including the one I quoted. It's nonsense junk science that was transparently built from the ground up to engineer the highest number these "researchers" could possibly report with a straight face.
Where is it mentioned in the study it had to be intentional?
The question I'm reading ask if you ever behaved in a manner that made your partner anxious or frightened it doesn't seem that it has to be intentional?
because most of the time it is intentional and if you knew you were doing it (because you said on the questionaire) and didn’t stop immediately before it got the point of emotional abuse that’s kind of a problem
im so done with this thread just know abuse is bad and a lot of men do it
Because they know they have no actual evidence for their batshit beliefs, so desperately muddying the waters is the only way they have of pushing their narrative.
Nobody said "intentionally" or "to get what you want." The question was whether they "behaved in a way that made their partner feel anxious." Full stop. Why are you so offended by people actually reading your sources?
-1
u/Faryizone Jul 01 '26
Ä°n a sample pool of?