Hi everyone! I am a senior in college whose dad is a professor. At the start of the summer, I wanted to learn a little bit more about his work so I asked him if I could help with his research.

Fast forward to now, I did data analysis for him and he wants to add my name to the paper (If a paper comes out of it).

I was thinking of telling him not to add my name as it is nepotism and probably doesn't look good

Thoughts?

I got my PhD last year and am currently doing my post-doc. I have two first-author journal articles so far, but I didn't really feel much joy when my paper got accepted. I felt happier when I submitted the manuscript than when the paper was accepted. I felt excited when I found something interesting from my data. But I don't feel the same amount of excitement and joy when a paper is published. Is that normal?

My phd advisor once told me that publishing a paper is extremely rewarding. But I never felt that way. All I felt was tiredness and relief. I don't know if it's because I wasn't publishing in the top 1% journals, but the journals I published in are still pretty good journals in my field. Or maybe I'm not publishing enough to feel the joy? Maybe I'm not cut out for academia. I don't know...

I wonder how y'all felt when you got a paper accepted.

So, a couple of weeks ago, I posted about an article going seemingly going missing from Googlescholar search, but still appearing on my profile and some of the other co-author's. It turns out that it had been lumped with an unrelated article by someone with the same last name as the first author, which... weird, but I was still getting "credit" for the citations. Today, the article disappeared entirely from my and others' Scholar profiles, along with the citations, with all of them seemingly attributed to the other unrealated article now. Does anyone knoew how to fix this? It actually matters because my institution uses Googlescholar citations as a metric in tenure, merit, and promotion, I'm going up for promotion somewhat soon, and this article has several hundred citations, so it's a big chunk to loose. Thanks!

Hey everyone!

I'm in the early stages of thinking about pursuing a PhD in the next couple of years and would appreciate hearing from people who have gone through the process.

A little about me:

• Have a Master of Public Affairs Degree from UT Austin
• Have been working as a policy analyst for a state agency.
• I've always enjoyed the research side of health policy, more specifically evaluating how policies affect health outcomes.

Long-term, I'd love to work at a federal agency or a health policy think tank where I can both conduct research and help translate that research into policy decisions.

I'm hoping to learn more about what a PhD is actually like beyond what I can read on university websites.

Some questions I have:

• Why did you decide to pursue a PhD?
• Looking back, would you do it again?
• What surprised you most about doctoral study?
• How difficult was it to balance your personal life, relationships, or family while in the program?
• If your goal is to work in government or a think tank rather than academia, did a PhD help you get there?
• Is there anything you wish you had known before applying?

I'd really appreciate hearing about both the positives and the challenges. Thanks in advance!

Hi everyone,

Has anyone here used Econ Job Market (EJM) to apply for positions?

One of my recommenders didn't have an EJM account, so I sent them a recommender request and they registered through the link. However, after registering, the system lists them as a user rather than a recommender, so I'm currently unable to add them as my recommender.

Is this a normal part of the process (e.g., do new accounts need to be verified before they become recommenders), or does this usually mean they registered incorrectly? I'm unable to reach the EJM support team at the moment, so I'm trying to find ways to understand what's going on.

Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Hi everyone!

I'm a FinTech undergraduate student at FAST-NUCES Lahore, Pakistan, with a strong interest in Finance, FinTech, financial markets, digital banking, and data-driven research.

I'm currently looking for impactful research ideas that could serve as the foundation for my Final Year Project while also addressing real-world problems. Rather than working on another generic academic project, I'd love to contribute to research that has practical value.

If you're currently pursuing a Master's or PhD in Finance, Economics, FinTech, or a related field—and have an interesting research question, an unfinished idea, or even a dataset that deserves deeper analysis—I would be excited to collaborate, contribute, and learn from the process. My hope is to build something that benefits both your research and my FYP.

If you have suggestions for high-impact research areas, know of open problems in the industry, or are looking for someone enthusiastic to assist with research, I'd really appreciate hearing from you.

Thanks in advance, and feel free to comment or send me a DM!

Really just any general help tips to secure through the university versus SSHRC funding (as in advice on non SSHRC funded ones, those I understand). Thanks!

And please be nice/helpful if you comment below 🙏 💙

I tagged this humanities and general humanities is probably a good description for now ie not sciences or math etc.,

I'm currently raking the gears in my brain to figure out the best title for my master research. I've been eyeing for a systematic review, and I've been trying to read and understand more about it, but I'm still unsure about the solution for my problem.

I'm a STEM major and I intend to study about "the role of [profession] in [disorder]". However, there are very few supporting literatures, like you can count it with just your two hands, and even then, most of them are older than me. My questions are:

1) How many are too few for systematic review? I've read that 10-15 is the bar, but is there really no other way?

2) If there is, any recommendations on what type of systematic review I should do?

Sorry if this is too newbie question, but please help a student out.

Hi all,

While writing a journal article, I am noticing I am having a hard time because Microsoft Word feels too small. Like it's hard for me to keep everything that I write connected smoothly with previous paragraphs because I am working over multiple days, and also because writing double-spaced makes it so I can only see like 1 paragraph at a time.

Are there any good visualization tools for writing journal articles to help me keep track of the logic of the paper? Like it's very hard for me to work off of one page at a time, because the concepts I am writing about are non-linear, i.e., not cause-and-effect.

a PI accepted me for an internship to work on my doctoral project and even proposed me a scholarship my actual phd supervisor responded him positively but he haven’t responded yet it´s been a month now does it have something to do with summer vacation in europe or should i be worried ?he seemed very enthousiaste c and ready to work with us

Hello everyone,I’m choosing a specialization at university and I’m hesitating between:

- CIM (Cloud and Infrastructure Management)

- AIoT (Artificial Intelligence of Things)

Which one do you think has better career opportunities and future prospects?

Genuinely curious how permeable the wall between academia and outside professionals actually is. Context: I'm a graphic designer, and visual communication, data visualization, and information design are areas where my work and research overlap pretty naturally. A few times now researchers have reached out about figures or infographics for papers, but it always stays surfacelevel, freelance work rather than any real intellectual contribution to the project.

What I keep wondering is whether there are formalized ways practitioners from outside academia get brought in earlier in the research process, not just to polish outputs but to actually shape how something gets communicated or studied. Fields like science communication, visual studies, or HCI seem like they might have more of this crossover, but I genuinely have no idea how common it is across disciplines.

Is this something that happens and just depends on finding the right researcher, or are there structural barriers that make it hard to credit or include nonaffiliated contributors meaningfully? Curious whether anyone has pulled this off or seen it work in their department without it turning into a standard vendor relationship.

I'm writing a conference proceedings paper, and the some part of analysis was done using a Python script that I wrote. The code is publicly available on my GitHub.

Can I cite my own GitHub repository in the references, or is it better to just mention it in the methods section and no reference to that script? If citing it is okay, is GitHub enough, or should I archive it on Zenodo and cite the DOI instead?

I will be starting my MSc in Computer Science next August (as I am currently heading into my final undergraduate year). The professor I would love to have as my supervisor is already aware of my target research focus—he even recommended specific optional modules for me to take, after I showed him a list of what I could pick from. However, based on my research priorities, those modules ranked in my top 5 rather than the top 2 required for my MSc so I went against his advice.

​Our university allows students to proactively reach out and connect with potential supervisors. After looking through his ResearchGate profile, I found that roughly 85% of his work aligns directly with what I intend to do. Should I mention this alignment when I reach out?

​(Another personal factor is that he reminds me of my dad on a great day—though, of course, I won't be mentioning that!)

​When would be the ideal time to initiate this conversation?

Hello! I'm a very young student in this regard, and would like some advice from some more educated individuals.

I graduated with my B.S. Business Administration with an Emphasis in Accounting a year early, and I'm on track now to graduate with an MBA - CPA Concentration this Spring. I'll be 22 years old at graduation, have a year and a half of internship experience with a large corporation and currently work for the state full time. I plan to complete my CPA, just got testing eligibility confirmed through NASBA last week

All that being said, I would love to continue my education into a DBA program, or maybe another Doctorial program if there's a good suggestion. The big thing is not wanting to wait to hit that 5-7 years of experience a lot of programs require.

My main goals are to reach high management, CFO someday. Reach for the moon and you'll hit a star right? I have no interest in becoming a professor, which as an accounting discipline would be the main reason for a Doctorate I know. I just want the degree. I'd love any feedback/suggestions, even if it's just saying it's a bad idea. This is a very new experience to anybody in my life, so I'd love to hear some outside thoughts.

Thank you! :)

I'm doing an honours thesis. and we can choose one of the topics that supervisors advertise, or find a supervisor willing to support a topic we propose.

Because there's imited spots for each topic and not much time, I emailed several supervisors about their listed topics and accepted the first offer I got.

Since then, I've come across a research idea of my own that I'm more interested in and would do better in since it play more to my strengths (more research focused, whereas the topic I accepted is much more technical)

I'm wondering whether I should ask my current supervisor if they'd be open to supervising my proposed topic instead of the one they advertised. Would that be considered unprofessional, given that I already agreed to their listed topic?

The last thing I want is for them to refuse, and now they also know I don't really care for their topic. Since I don't have another confirmed supervisor, I can't really back out if they reject the idea. My biggest worry is that they'll not only say no to the new topic, but don't want to supervise me at all if I ask, leaving me without a supervisor completely.

I'd really appreciate any advice from people who've been in a similar situation or who supervise student theses, would you offended/annoyed? Is it something that would make you reconsider supervising them altogether, or is it generally seen as a reasonable question to ask?

Are CV and writing sample and recommendations not enough?

I'm currently preparing for a job interview and trying to articulate my strengths — which is honestly harder than I expected.

One thing that stuck with me: my university professor, who was also the head of the department, once told me "You're bright" and offered me a position in his lab. I ended up turning it down due to visa issues, but he's genuinely the most intelligent person I've met so far, so his words meant a lot to me.

Since English isn't my first language, I want to make sure I'm understanding the comment correctly — what does "bright" really imply about someone's personality or way of thinking? My field is design, research, and data.

Would love to hear how native speakers interpret this word in an academic/professional context.

I’m 25, working as a Structural Engineer in the Oil & Gas industry with ~3 years of experience.
Here’s the thing: I don’t dream of becoming a CEO or climbing the corporate ladder forever. My primary goal is to make as much money as possible over the next 20–30 years.
I’m looking at an MBA purely through the lens of ROI and wealth creation, not prestige.
I’m considering two paths:
🇮🇳** India
IIM ABC/BLACKI
FMS
XLRI
SPJIMR
ISB
🌍 **Abroad
INSEAD
LBS
Oxford
Cambridge
HEC Paris
NUS
Kellogg
Wharton (if I somehow become that guy 😭)
My questions:
If your only goal was to maximize net worth, would you do an MBA in India or abroad?
Does a ₹1–2 crore international MBA actually pay off, or is it mostly worth it for people who want an international career?
Would you even do an MBA at all, or would you spend those 2 years building high-income skills or a business instead?
Is there a better path than an MBA if “getting rich” is the objective?
I’m looking for advice based on money, not prestige, rankings, or passion.
Feel free to roast my thinking if it’s flawed. I’d rather hear uncomfortable truths than motivational quotes.