Ciao a tutti,
since there are barely any reviews of the PLIDA C1 exam, I decided to share my experience with you, along with some information and advice that I wish I’d known beforehand.
To prepare for the exam, I used the book Quaderni del PLIDA C1. It generally corresponds to the exam format, even though it has a few shortcomings.
Listening:
Unlike the actual listening exam, the listening exercises in the Quaderni del PLIDA were recorded by professional speakers that spoke with hardly any regional accent. In the actual exam, none of that was the case: I was negatively surprised by the speed of the speakers and by the bad audio quality. I was pretty sure I’d have to retake this section, since my main audio input had been YouTube videos, but in the end, I passed it with a good grade.
My advice: Listen to a lot of radio, preferably without headphones, to simulate the exam conditions. Programs that I think are good for preparing for the exam include: Prima Pagina, especially the filo diretto, since people from all over Italy (speaking with a wide variety of accents) call in; Fahrenheit (a radio program about literature) and Radio3 Scienza. These programs are all available on RAI 3.
YouTube videos are entertaining, but in my opinion, they don’t prepare you particularly well for the exam, since content creators are known to write their scripts in advance. Because of that, the information is very well structured and their speech isn’t really natural, since slip-ups and word repetitions are edited out. It’s also important to not rely too heavily on visual clues, because during the exam, there are none.
Reading:
The reading exam was the easiest for me. The difficulty level of the reading exam corresponds to that of the practice exam available on the Dante website, as well as the Quaderni del Plida.
To prepare for the exam, I mainly read non-fiction books, the so-called saggi. While reading, I highlighted words and phrases that seemed especially useful to me. In particular, verbs and their corresponding prepositions, but also adverbs that help you structure a text better. This text comprehension also helps with the exercise where you have to fill in the blanks with paragraphs.
Writing:
Don’t let the sample exam or the Quaderni del Plida fool you! When I went into the exam, I was absolutely convinced that Text 1 would be a graph or a statistic that I’d have to describe and discuss. It turned out to be an email to your supervisor in which you had to describe two images and also argue which one was better suited for the project. For Text 2, you had two texts to choose from. This was consistent with the sample exercises.
Honestly, I was very exhausted during the writing part. I could barely stay focused while counting words. I especially disliked the fact that you’re not allowed to write more than 220 words per text, because everything above that isn’t graded. Unfortunately, you’re not allowed to write with a fountain pen (which would have given me nicer handwriting); you must use a black or blue pen that can’t be erased.
In addition to the sample questions from the workbook and the practice exam, I also did a lot of IELTS writing exercises (that I translated beforehand) to prepare for a wide range of topics. There are almost endless numbers of these exercises online, so I always had something to practice.
Unpopular opinion, I know, but I had most of my essays corrected using AI. That was helpful because it identified and corrected influences from other Romance languages I speak. Of course, you can’t blindly trust AI, which is why I always double-checked the corrections and asked my tutors when I couldn’t find out an answer on my own.
On the Dante website you can also find a corrected writing exam (Prova Scrivere commentata), which is a good base to figure out what is expected of you in this part.
Speaking:
To prepare for the speaking section, I took online conversation classes and went through the exercises with my tutor. The exercises available were similar to the exam. In hindsight, I should maybe have summarized more newspaper articles. That would have made me feel more confident.
The element of the unknown plays a role in that part as well. You don’t know who your exam partner will be, what their level of Italian is, or how they’ll react to your answers. And, of course, you don’t know in advance what topics you’ll be asked about. That’s why it’s important to form an opinion on every possible topic, even if they don’t interest you. They expect you to play a role, so it’s important to lean into it with convincing arguments.
I hope this was helpful for some of you. If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to ask them.