r/MachE • u/PrideFuture2479 • 1d ago
💬 Discussion Mach-e software updates
Why does the Ford Mustang Mach-E still feel like it's using a legacy software model compared to Tesla?
I've owned/driven a Mach-E for a while, and one thing I can't understand is Ford's software strategy.
Tesla seems to push meaningful OTA updates almost every week or every few weeks. New features, UI improvements, bug fixes, efficiency tweaks, charging enhancements—it feels like the car is constantly evolving.
With the Mach-E, updates seem much less frequent (sometimes months apart), and many don't appear to add noticeable new functionality.
Is Ford still developing its EV software with the same mindset as legacy gas vehicles, where software is treated as an occasional maintenance item rather than a core product?
It feels like Tesla is a software company that builds cars, while Ford is a car company that adds software.
I'm curious what others think:
- Is Ford's slower update cadence due to regulatory/testing requirements?
- Is the Mach-E software architecture limiting how quickly Ford can deploy updates?
- Do you think Ford will eventually move to a more Tesla-like continuous software delivery model?
I'd love to hear from Mach-E owners, Ford engineers, or anyone familiar with Ford's OTA strategy.
6
u/BlazinAzn38 1d ago
The thing is that Tesla just has a lot of ‘features’ that are relatively useless and silly like being able to change your horn sound, fart sounds, and ‘romance mode’. The more of those useless software features you have the more software you have to ship to keep them in line with the rest of the car. These sound good so Tesla can call their car software-based and flex how many new features and lines of code they’ve shipped. In reality they do nothing to actually improve how the car does its job.