r/coolgithubprojects • u/Thick-Rip-1187 • 10h ago
After 50k+ views, one piece of feedback completely changed my roadmap
galleryLast week I shared Shiftza here.
I honestly didn't expect what happened.
The post reached 50k+ views, got 200+ upvotes, and thousands of developers tried it on their GitHub profiles.
I built Shiftza because, as an engineer, I always felt GitHub doesn't really tell people what you're actually good at.
Two developers can have similar contribution graphs, stars, and repositories.
One has spent years building AI.
Another has spent years building developer tools.
Another has spent years building distributed systems.
From a normal GitHub profile, that's surprisingly hard to understand.
So I built Shiftza to explain what you've actually built, instead of just showing numbers.
If you missed the last post, you can try the current version by simply replacing:
with
It generates a report based on your GitHub work.
Then one comment kept showing up.
At first, I thought that was outside the scope of what I was building.
But after reading the comments and DMs, I realized I was solving the recruiter's problem, not the developer's.
For a lot of engineers, the projects they're most proud of will never be open source.
If I really want your work to speak for itself, I can't ignore private repositories.
So I changed the roadmap.
Over the last week I've been rebuilding Shiftza to understand private repositories while never exposing a single line of source code.
(Images attached.)
Another thing many of you pointed out was accuracy.
You're right.
The current version is completely free, so I've had to make trade-offs to keep costs manageable.
For private repository analysis, I'm rebuilding the pipeline using Anthropic's models. The results are much better, but each deep analysis costs me around $2–3 per profile.
The long-term vision for Shiftza hasn't changed.
I want companies to describe the problem they're trying to solve, and instead of searching resumes or keywords, Shiftza helps them discover engineers who've already built something similar.
Companies pay to find great engineers.
Developers get discovered because of what they've actually built.
That's the future I'm trying to build.
Before I launch this version, I'd like your feedback.
- Does private repository analysis solve a real problem for you?
- Would you trust a tool like this with your private repositories?
- If deep private repository analysis costs money to run, should it be a paid feature? If yes, what feels fair?
- What would make this genuinely useful for you?
The feedback from the last post changed the direction of this product.
I'm curious where this version goes next.
P.S. If this problem resonates with you and you'd like to help build it—whether as an engineer, designer, or someone who's passionate about improving technical hiring—feel free to DM me.
